Berg, Alaina C

Abstract Objectives Breast milk is the recommended nutritional source for newborns and has been associated with decreased morbidity in low‐birth‐weight and preterm infants. In situations where breast milk is not available, donor breast milk is an alternative. Milk banking is becoming increasingly common worldwide to meet this need. Although the benefits of donor breast milk for the recipient infant are well established, the health impact on the breast milk donor and the infant of the breast milk donor is an area of current research. We aim to synthesize and evaluate the available evidence regarding the impact of donating breast milk on the health, lactation, and well‐being of the breast milk donor, and the health and growth of the infant of the breast milk donor. Methods We will search electronic databases, grey literature, and the websites of relevant international organizations. We will include studies that involve lactating women and their infants, healthy or with health conditions, who donate breast milk, without restrictions on study date, language, or study design. If sufficient homogeneity exists between studies, we will complete meta‐analyses. We will evaluate the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias tool or the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non‐Randomized Studies tool. We will evaluate the overall certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we will summarize the current literature regarding the effects of human milk donation on human milk donors and their infants.

Abstract Objectives Human milk has been shown to reduce severe morbidity in preterm/low‐birth‐weight infants and is therefore the recommended nutritional source. When infants cannot receive maternal milk, donor human milk (DHM) is recommended. The use of human milk banking facilities is increasing to meet the need for DHM. DHM is unique compared to maternal milk as it must be processed and stored. The processing and storage of animal milk has been more rigorously studied than human milk and can serve as proxy to create DHM banking guidelines. Methods and Analysis We will search electronic databases, grey literature, and the websites of relevant international organizations. We will include studies that evaluated the impact of storage, handling, and treatment on the nutritional quality and safety of animal milk. We will not restrict study date, language, or design. If sufficient homogeneity exists between studies, we will conduct a meta‐analysis. We will evaluate the methodological quality of each study using the SYRCLE's (Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation) risk of bias tool. (1) We will evaluate the overall certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, commissioned by the World Health Organization, we will synthesize the available literature regarding the impact of various storage, handling, and treatment practices on the nutritional quality and safety of animal milk.

Introduction Gastrointestinal hospitalisations in the USA cause over US$130 billion in expenditures, and acute pancreatitis is a leading cause of these hospitalisations. Adequate pain control is one of the primary treatment goals for acute pancreatitis. Though opioids are commonly used for analgesia in these patients, there have been concerns about short-term and long-term side effects of using opioids. Recently, non-opioid medications have been studied to treat pain in patients with acute pancreatitis. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of analgesic medication for non-severe, acute pancreatitis. Methods and analysis We will search multiple electronic databases for randomised controlled trials that study pain management in patients with non-severe, acute pancreatitis. The intervention will be any analgesic for acute pancreatitis in the hospital setting. The comparison group will be patients who received a placebo or other active interventions for pain management. The primary outcomes of interest include pain scores and the need for supplementary analgesia. The secondary outcomes will be serious adverse events, local complications, progression to severe pancreatitis, transfer to the intensive care unit, length of hospitalisation, time to start enteral feeds, 30-day all-cause mortality and Quality of Life Scale scores. If sufficient homogeneity exists among included studies, the findings will be pooled using a traditional pairwise and network meta-analysis. The risk of bias in randomised control trials will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to report the certainty of evidence. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review will not involve direct contact with human subjects. The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. They will give healthcare providers a better awareness of the optimal analgesic medication for pain treatment in non-severe, acute pancreatitis.