Douse, Dontre'

Introduction: Differential diagnoses of a pediatric neck mass are extensive, ranging across benign, malignant, congenital and infectious causes. Limited access to imaging in low-resource settings increases the complexity of narrowing this list to appropriately diagnose and treat neck masses. This occasionally allows neck masses to grow unchecked, increasing the morbidity of their presence and eventual excision. The goal of this report is to describe nuances in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric neck masses in resource-limited settings through a case report of a neck mass in a pediatric patient. Patient presentation: A 10-year-old girl in Harare, Zimbabwe, presented for surgical management of a midline neck mass that appeared 4 years prior to presentation for definitive treatment. A myriad of barriers delayed her care, allowing the mass to grow into her floor of mouth, displacing her tongue and leading to speech and feeding difficulties. Management and outcome: At presentation to the tertiary care facility, she received a pre-operative ultrasound showing a well-circumscribed, echogenic mass. Her neck mass was surgically excised through a transoral approach. Permanent pathology was consistent with a dermoid cyst. Conclusion: At 1-month postoperative follow-up, the patient had experienced no complications and had a complete resolution of her functional symptoms and appearance. Contribution: We present a case that can illuminate the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric neck masses. Additionally, we facilitate an important discussion on transoral versus transcervical approach for midline neck masses with the decision hinging on size, location, surgeon preference and comfort and consideration of cosmesis.

AbstractObjectivesOropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been rising. This manuscript looks to explore racial disparities in the surgical management of OPSCC.MethodsA cancer database was queried for patients with OPSCC diagnosed from 2004 to 2017. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between patient race/ethnicity, surgical treatment, and reasons for lack of surgery.Results37 306 (74.3%) patients did not undergo surgery, while 12 901 (25.7%) patients did. Non‐Hispanic black (NHB) patients were less likely to undergo surgery than other races (17.9% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.0001). In clinical discussions, the Asian, Native American, Hawaiian, Pacific Islander (ANAHPI), and unknown race group was more likely to directly refuse surgery when recommended (2.5% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.015).ConclusionRacial differences exist in treatment for OPSCC. NHB patients are less likely to actually undergo surgical management for OPSCC, while other patients are more likely to directly “refuse” surgery outright when offered.