Back to Authors

Passmore, Rachael

0009-0005-2905-0217

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 4

The Association Between Patient-Reported Social Risks and the HOUSES Index: A Rural-Urban Comparison
Sosso, Jessica , Wi, Chung‐Il , Jegen, Dominika , Matthews, Marc R. , Maxson, Julie, Bernard, Matthew , Foss, Randy , Hidaka, Brandon H. , Passmore, Rachael , Garrison, Gregory M. , Sosso, Jessica L , Wi, Chung-Ii , Jegen, Dominika A , Matthews, Marc, Stacey, Stephen K , Foss, Randy , Hidaka, Brandon , Passmore, Rachael , Garrison, Gregory M , Thacher, Thomas D , Matthews, Marc R , Fischer, Karen M., Thacher, Tom D.

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | September 2, 2025 | Volume: 16 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319251369673 Get It

Introduction/Objectives: Little is known about the prevalence of patient-reported social risk factors and the use of the HOUSES Index, a simple, reliable method of assessing socioeconomic status (SES) based on publicly available housing data, in a predominantly rural, primary care population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adult patients paneled to family medicine clinicians in a US Midwest health system as of December 31, 2022. Patients’ listed address determined HOUSES Index as quartile rank (Q1 lowest SES) and rural/urban status. Social risk data including housing, food, transportation, finances, and violence were collected from health record questionnaires. A mixed effect model was used to assess associations between social risk, HOUSES Index, and rurality. Results: Of the 352 355 patients included, rural patients were more likely than urban patients to report all social risk factors and had lower SES as measured by HOUSES quartiles. In the mixed effects analysis, HOUSES quartile was independently predictive of reporting an at-risk social risk factor (Q1 vs Q4 OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 2.19-2.37), but rurality was not (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.97-1.07) after adjusting for HOUSES. Conclusions: The increased prevalence of social risk factors among rural residents is largely explained by individual SES measured by HOUSES Index.
Reported Behavioral Patterns and Concern Surrounding Well Water Testing for Arsenic in Midwestern Homeowners with Children
Jegen, Dominika , Maxson, Julie, Averkamp, Natalie , Passmore, Rachael , Sosso, Jessica , Thacher, Tom D. , Averkamp, Natalie M. , Jegen, Dominika A , Sosso, Jessica L , Stacey, Stephen K , Thacher, Thomas D , Passmore, Rachael

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | March 28, 2025 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 504

10.3390/ijerph22040504 Get It

Toxins from ingested water can significantly affect overall physical health in children and adults. In the United States, domestic water wells are not commonly tested for any heavy metal contaminants. It is well-known that chronic arsenic ingestion from water is linked to serious health effects. We surveyed patients at our academic institution via emailed questionnaires in 2023 to determine whether those with children living at home reported different patterns of behavior around well water testing as compared to those without. Survey data were collected from 8994 respondents in the U.S. Midwest who reported using residential well water. Results were used to evaluate the influence of children in the home on testing behaviors, and secondarily, whether parental demographics affected testing frequency. Respondents with children at home did not report increased testing frequency compared to those without. In parents who did report testing, having more children, being younger, and living in Wisconsin were associated with an increased frequency. Parental gender, race, and ethnicity did not correlate with testing behaviors. A total of 70% of respondents did not feel concerned about their water safety and 85% were not concerned about arsenic specifically in their water. Increased risk of toxicity to children from arsenic does not appear to influence reported well water testing behavior among parents.
Team-Based Approach to Successful Annual Wellness Visits
Passmore, Rachael , Iqbal, Asif, Rader, Taylor L. , Ashley, Kelly, Illies, Allie J. Canoy, Madden, Kathleen A., Walter, Jennifer L., Crockett, Eric D. , Stroebel, Robert J. , Passmore, Rachael , Canoy Illies, Allie J, Ashley, Kelly

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | May 2, 2024 | Volume: 15 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319241249400 Get It

Objective: The purpose of this study was to implement a 2-phase approach to rapidly increase the number of annual wellness visits (AWVs) and build a sustainable model at 3 study units (Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and clinics in 2 regions of Mayo Clinic Health System), which collectively serve approximately 80 000 patients who qualify for an AWV annually. Methods: In the rapid improvement phase, beginning in July 2022, goals at the facilities were reoriented to prioritize AWVs, educate staff on existing AWV resources, and create low-effort workflows so that AWVs could be incorporated into existing patient appointments. Staff at all 3 study units worked independently and iterated quickly. In the second phase, all study units collaborated to design and implement a best-practice solution while they leveraged the engagement and lessons learned from the first phase and invested in additional system elements and change management to codify long-term success. Results: The number of AWVs completed monthly increased in each study unit. In the rapid improvement phase, the number of AWVs increased but then plateaued (or decreased at some study units). In April 2023, the final scheduled outreach automation and visit tools were implemented, and the number of AWVs was sustained or increased, while outreach and scheduling times were decreased. The number of completed AWVs increased from 1148 across all study units in the first 6 months of 2022 to 14 061 during the first 6 months of 2023. Conclusions: The lessons learned from this project can be applied to other health systems that want to provide more patients with AWVs while improving operational efficiency. The keys are to have a clear vision of a successful outcome, engage all stakeholders, and iterate quickly to find what works best for the organization.
Arsenic Exposure in Well Water From the Perspective of Patients and Providers
Jegen, Dominika , Maxson, Julie, Bernard, Matthew , Foss, Randy , Hidaka, Brandon H. , Passmore, Rachael , Sosso, Jessica , Stacey, Stephen K , Thacher, Tom D. , Fischer, Karen, Foss, Randy , Hidaka, Brandon , Passmore, Rachael , Thacher, Thomas D , Jegen, Dominika A , Fischer, Karen

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | April 29, 2024 | Volume: 15 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319241247984 Get It

Background: Arsenic is a well-known toxin which may contaminate household water. It is harmful when ingested over prolonged periods of time. As a result, public health experts recommend that water should be screened and treated to prevent arsenic ingestion. In the United States, the responsibility of testing and treatment of private wells falls on homeowners. Despite recommendations for routine screening, this is rarely done. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of well water use in a Midwestern patient population, how patients and clinicians perceive the risks of arsenic in well water, and whether additional resources on well water testing are desired. These findings will be used to influence tools for clinicians regarding symptom and examination findings of chronic arsenic exposure and potentiate the distribution of informational resources on well water testing. Methods: Surveys were sent via email to all actively practicing primary care clinicians at the Mayo Clinic in the United States Midwest, and all active adult patients at the Mayo Clinic in the same region. Our team analyzed survey data to determine whether both patients and clinicians are aware of the health effects of chronic arsenic toxicity from well water, the need for routine well water testing and whether each group wants more information on the associated risks. Results: Both patients and primary care clinicians worry about arsenic exposure. Patients with well water are concerned about their water safety yet feel uninformed about testing options. Clinicians do not know how prevalent well water use is among their patients, feel uninformed about the chronic risks of arsenic exposure and the physical examination associated with it. Both groups unanimously want more information on testing options. Conclusions: Our findings show a significant reliance on well water use in the American Midwest, and unanimous support for the need for further well water testing information and resources for patients and their clinicians.