Mathias, Patrick C

AbstractBackgroundWith the widespread adoption of Blood Establishment Computer Systems and other Blood Collection and Transfusion Service (BCTS) clinical information systems (CIS), electronic blood donor, product, and patient data are now routinely required for clinical, regulatory, operational, and quality needs. That data are often not readily accessible for such secondary use within CIS databases, particularly for applications with significant data availability requirements such as machine learning and artificial intelligence. Data replication provides one avenue by which CIS data can be made more readily available.Study Design and MethodsMembers of the AABB's Information Systems Committee along with institutional information technology colleagues provided a multi‐institutional viewpoint on data replication through the lens of BCTS specific use cases. Case studies of informatics offerings leveraging such technologies were also elicited.ResultsSix distinct use cases describe the potential role of data replication including the creation of data warehouses for frontline laboratory staff. Specific BCTS examples for each use case are presented to highlight the value of data replication, including visualization of critical inventory (O red blood cells, HLA‐compatible platelets) and utilization analytics for patient blood management. Two case studies describe the approach to implement such technologies to (1) optimize staffing via laboratory workload reporting and (2) improve access to blood via antigen‐negative blood product location services.DiscussionData replication and warehousing can empower BCTS analytic offerings not otherwise natively available through one's CIS to improve patient care and laboratory operations.

Abstract Background Chronic diarrhea can be categorized as fatty, watery, or inflammatory. Watery diarrhea is further divided into secretory or osmotic types and can be differentiated by measuring fecal electrolytes and osmotic gap. However, with widespread use of endoscopy, it is unclear if these measurements are being used clinically. Furthermore, because stool is not a validated specimen type for Food and Drug Administration–approved electrolyte assays, utilization is a practical concern for laboratories before analytical validation. Here, we determined the clinical utility and validated the performance characteristics of stool electrolytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Methods Historical results and literature review were used to determine the clinically relevant ranges for stool electrolytes (Na+, Cl−, K+, phosphate, and Mg2+). Additionally, medical chart review was performed (n = 44 patients) on results to evaluate their clinical utility in chronic diarrhea work-up. Linearity, precision, and stability studies were performed on the AU680. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing results to the Roche Cobas 6000 c501. Results For all cases, stool electrolytes and osmotic gap proved valuable in chronic diarrhea work-up. The imprecision of the assays ranged from 0% to 5.9%. All assays were found to be linear within the instrument's analytical measurement range with appropriate slopes and intercepts. The bias between the AU680 and the Roche c501 ranged from −0.48 to 2.39 (mmol/L or mg/dL). Na+, Cl−, and K+ were stable refrigerated for 5 days and up to 1 freeze-thaw cycle. Phosphate and Mg2+ were stable refrigerated for 48 h, but unstable to freeze-thaw cycles. Conclusions Stool osmotic gap is valuable for evaluating chronic diarrhea and can be calculated using electrolyte concentrations measured on the AU680.