Johnson, Derek R.

Abstract Background Despite advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of meningioma progression and innovations in systemic and local treatments, recurrent meningiomas remain a substantial therapeutic challenge. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a historical baseline, contemporary analysis, and propose a “rate of probable interest” to inform future clinical trial design and development on behalf of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology meningioma group. Methods PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ASCOpubs databases were screened for clinical trials evaluating the activity of systemic therapies for adults with recurrent meningiomas. The pooled progression-free survival at 6-months and 1-year (PFS-6 and PFS-1 year) values were calculated using the random effects technique with I2 indices. Results The pooled PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates for recurrent WHO grade 1 meningiomas were 43.6% (95% CI: 22.7-67.0%, I2 = 80%) and 21.7% (95% CI: 6.2-53.9%, I2 = 76%), and for grades 2-3 meningiomas, the PFS-6 was 38.0% (95% CI: 28.3-48.8%, I2 = 68%). In the targeted therapy group, PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates stood at 62.0% (I2 = 58%) and 49.0% (I2 = 63%) for grade 1, while for grades 2-3 tumors, the PFS-6 rates with targeted therapy and immunotherapy were 42.1% (I² = 60%) and 46.0% (I² = 0%), respectively. The benchmarks were set at 67% and 54% for PFS-6 and PFS-1 year for grade 1 tumors, and PFS-6 of 49% for grades 2-3 tumors. Conclusions Several studies have reported outcomes in patients with recurrent meningiomas testing a variety of agents with modest, but variable and progressively increasing activity. In this context, we recommend new benchmarks for future trials to define efficacy of future investigational therapies.

AbstractBackgroundEvidence for abnormal amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaque accumulation is necessary prior to initiating anti‐amyloid therapy in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the clinical trials for lecanemab and related drugs utilized positron emission tomography (PET) to demonstrate brain amyloidosis, current appropriate use recommendations for clinical practice consider PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as satisfactory for this purpose. Here, we present four clinical cases where CSF biomarker results were discordant from amyloid PET, with the potential to result in erroneous treatment targeting.MethodPatients were seen at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic in consideration for lecanemab therapy. All patients had office examination, neuropsychological assessment, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid PET (with either 11C‐Pittsburgh compound B or 18F‐florbetapir), CSF AD biomarkers (Roche Elecsys p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Fujirebio Lumipulse Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios), and apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele testing. Amyloid PET interpretations were made by consensus visual review from experienced readers.ResultAll four patients had clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (Table 1). Two patients had positive CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios with negative amyloid PET (indicating sparse to no neuritic plaques). Case 1 displayed aphasia (characterized by anomia and deep dysgraphia) and imaging findings possibly compatible with semantic dementia. Case 2 displayed a gait abnormality and imaging signs of abnormal CSF dynamics. Two other patients had negative CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 measures with positive amyloid PET (indicating moderate to frequent neuritic plaques). In those instances, the clinical syndrome and imaging studies were strongly supportive of AD and the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio was “likely positive” (Table 1). For one patient (Case 4), tau PET and Lumipulse plasma p‐tau217 concentration were both positive.ConclusionClinicians prescribing anti‐amyloid therapies should be aware of the possibility for CSF biomarkers to be discordant from amyloid PET status in select scenarios. These cases highlight the value of considering PET imaging in the presence of clinically atypical features, concern for mixed etiology, or strong clinical suspicion for AD despite negative CSF biomarkers. Larger series are needed to identify broader patterns contributing to biomarker discordance by assay, modality (PET versus CSF/plasma measures), and medical/neurologic comorbidities.

Abstract Adult primary leptomeningeal gliomatosis (PLG) is a rare, rapidly progressive and fatal disease characterized by prominent leptomeningeal infiltration by a glial tumor without an identifiable parenchymal mass. The molecular profile of adult PLG has not been well‐characterized. We report the clinical, pathological, and molecular findings of six adult PLG patients (five males and one female), median age 58 years. All cases exhibited pathological leptomeningeal enhancement at presentation. Leptomeningeal biopsy was diagnostic in five (of six) cases, revealing infiltration by an astrocytic glioma with mitotic activity, lacking microvascular proliferation or necrosis. One case was diagnosed at autopsy. All tumors were IDH‐wildtype, with five harboring TERT promoter mutations. Additional mutations identified were PTEN in one case, TP53 in two cases, and NF1 in two cases. A chromosome profile with +7/−10 was found in four cases, whereas the remaining two showed either chromosome 7 or 7p gain only. Four cases showed chromosome 9p loss with CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, one case showed hemizygous CDKN2A/B loss, and one case showed intact chromosome 9 and CDK4/GLI1 amplification. DNA methylation profiling was performed in four cases and revealed a match to glioblastoma (GBM) family and mesenchymal typical class with high confidence scores in two cases; the other two cases showed only suggestive combined scores for GBM family and mesenchymal atypical class. The molecular profile of all cases closely aligned with that of adult‐type GBM, IDH‐wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. All patients succumbed to the disease. In five cases with extensive leptomeningeal disease at diagnosis, the course was rapid, with median survival of 24 days following palliative care. Only one case, with relatively localized disease at diagnosis, received chemoradiation therapy and survived 535 days, raising the possibility that early diagnosis and timely treatment could improve outcome. A detailed list of previously reported cases is provided in a supplementary table.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Lymphopenia attributed to postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can accelerate tumor recurrence and contribute to poor prognosis in GBM. We hypothesize that short course (1-2 weeks) CRT can mitigate lymphopenia compared to standard course and may provide immune benefits for future combination therapy. METHODS GBM patients were randomized on a multi-site phase II study comparing short course (35Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/10Fx depending on target volume) (Arm A) versus standard dose fractionation (60Gy/30Fx or 40Gy/15Fx, Arm B). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This unplanned interim analysis evaluates changes of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CD4 and CD8 prospectively at 3-timepoints: baseline (prior to CRT), end of CRT, and 1-month post-CRT. RESULTS To date, 72 patients enrolled (34 Arm A, 38 Arm B). Median age 66 (35-86), ECOG 0-2. Patients characteristics as followed in Arm A vs. Arm B, respectively: female 47% vs. 42%, MGMT promotor methylated 31% vs. 34%, steroid use 46% vs. 45%, ALC 1310 cells/mm3 (330 –9730) vs. 1480 (750 –7750), CD4 531 cells/mm3 (86 –1368) vs. 662 (318 –1671), and CD8 151 cells/mm3 (56 –940) vs. 272 (68 –875). Lymphocytes data were collected in 49 patients (21 Arm A, 28 Arm B). There were signficantly fewer reductions of ALC, CD4 and CD8 in Arm A. Median ALC changes were 95% and 99% of baseline (Arm A) vs 52% and 61% of baseline (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p<0.01). Median CD4 changes 93% and 96% of baseline (Arm A) vs 51% and 49% (Arm B), and median CD8 changes 97% and 98% of baseline (Arm A) vs 57% and 71% (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS This interim analysis suggests that short course RT could reduce treatment-related lymphopenia and immune suppression compared to standard RT, thus could be potentially beneficial to combine with immunotherapy.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioma radiotherapy planning requires accurate tumor delineation. While T1- contrast-enhanced-MRI (T1-CE-MRI) is the standard, due to blood-brain-barrier breakdown dependencies, T1-CE-MRI fails to reflect the extent of glioma. Studies using amino acid PET tracers report glioma uptake up to 3cm-4cm beyond T1-CE. In this study, amino acid tracer 18F-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) uptake was correlated with histopathological features to determine tumor thresholds. METHODS Using registered 18F-DOPA-PET and T1-CE-MRI images in the Stealth Neuronavigation system targeting concordant and discordant regions, 181 stereotactic biopsy samples (newly-diagnosed=74; recurrent=107) were obtained from 59 enrolled astrocytoma patients across two prospective phase II clinical trials between 2010-2019. An experienced neuropathologist reviewed each sample with hematoxylin and eosin stain and assigned an alphanumeric score: mitotic activity (0=no tumor; 1=no mitosis; 2=few/scattered mitosis; 3=frequent mitosis) and cellular density (A=<25%; B=25%-50%; C=50%-75%; D=>75%). Samples assigned 1C-1D, 2B-2D, or 3A-3D were categorized as histopathological high-score (aggressive disease), remaining samples as low-score. Relative mean (rFDOPA_mean) tumor-to-background uptake ratios were computed for 5mm uniformly expanded volumes from each Stealth biopsy coordinate using the crescent and wedge normalization methods. Relative uptake was compared overall and separately within newly-diagnosed/recurrent disease subgroups. An optimal rFDOPA_mean threshold to delineate high- from low-score was determined using the maximal Youden index of ROC curves. RESULTS Overall, high-score samples (n=116) had higher median (IQR) rFDOPA_mean uptake than low-score samples (n=65): high-score rFDOPA:mean=1.70(1.16-2.26), low-score rFDOPA:mean=1.16(0.83-1.49), Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001. The uptake difference between high- vs. low-score samples was observed within newly-diagnosed and recurrent subgroups, but was only significant for newly-diagnosed (p<0.001). For newly-diagnosed, an rFDOPA:mean=1.49 cutoff between high- and low-score groups shows 69% accuracy, 63% sensitivity, 80% specificity (AUC=0.782). Using the wedge normalization method, rFDOPA_mean values were 0.2 higher than crescent method values. CONCLUSIONS This work presents histologically verified 18F-DOPA-PET thresholds for aggressive disease in newly-diagnosed astrocytoma patients. Separate thresholds will need to be determined for recurrent glioma patients.

Objective Visual assessments of amyloid-β PET, used for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and treatment evaluation, require a careful approach when different PET ligands are utilized. Because the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) ligand bindings vary with age, the objective was to investigate the agreement between visual reads of 11C- and 18F-PET scans. Methods Cognitively unimpaired (CU) younger adults (N = 30; 39.5 ± 6.0 years), CU older adults (N = 30; 68.6 ± 5.9 years), and adults with AD (N = 22; 67.0 ± 8.5 years) underwent brain MRI, 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB)-PET, and 18F-flutemetamol-PET. Amyloid-β deposition was assessed visually by two nuclear medicine specialists on 11C-PiB-PET and 18F-flutemetamol-PET, and quantitatively by PET centiloids. Results Seventy-two 11C-PiB-PET and 18F-flutemetamol-PET visual reads were concordant. However, 1 18F-flutemetamol-PET and 9 11C-PiB-PET were discordant with quantitative values. In four additional cases, while 11C-PiB-PET and 18F-flutemetamol-PET visual reads were concordant, they were discordant with quantitative values. Disagreements in CU younger adults were only with 11C-PiB-PET visual reads. The remaining disagreements were with CU older adults. Conclusion Age, GM/WM binding, amyloid-β load, and disease severity may affect visual assessments of PET ligands. Increase in WM binding with age causes a loss of contrast between GM and WM on 11C-PiB-PET, particularly in CU younger adults, leading to false positivity. In CU older adults, increased WM signal may bleed more into cortical regions, hiding subtle cortical uptake, especially with 18F-flutemetamol, whereas 11C-PiB can detect true regional positivity. Understanding these differences will improve patient care and treatment evaluation in clinic and clinical trials.

Dilated perivascular spaces (PVSs) are common and easily recognized on imaging. However, rarer giant tumefactive PVSs (GTPVSs) can have unusual multilocular cystic configurations, and are often confused for other pathologic entities, including neoplasms, cystic infarctions, and neuroepithelial cysts. Because GTPVSs are scarcely encountered and even more infrequently operated upon, many radiologists are unaware of the imaging and pathologic features of these lesions. Here, a case of a resected GTPVS is presented, highlighting both its radiologic and histologic characteristics, and discussing how such lesions can be differentiated from their closest mimickers on imaging.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grades 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after the exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside this, integrated molecular imaging allows for a noninvasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of “theranostics” has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of “theranostic” treatment approaches.