Jabal, Mohamed Sobhi

AbstractBackground and PurposeThe Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a widely used scoring system for evaluating ischemic stroke to determine therapeutic strategy. However, there is variation in the interobserver agreement of ASPECTS. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to investigate the interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies of noncontrast CT performed within 24 hours of ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.ResultsA total of 20 studies, with 3482 patients, reporting interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS were included in the meta‐analysis. The interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS in studies using Kappa coefficient (κ) analysis was substantial (κ = .67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .57‐.78). In studies using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, agreement was excellent (ICC = .84, 95% CI: .77‐.90). Interobserver agreement was higher in studies in which the observer was unblinded to clinical scenario in both groups (κ = .74, 95% CI: .59‐.89, and ICC = .82, 95% CI: .79‐.85). Per‐region analysis showed that the caudate nucleus had the highest agreement (κ = .68, 95% CI: .60‐.76, and ICC = .84, 95% CI: .74‐.93), while M2 and internal capsule in Kappa studies (κ = .45, 95% CI: .34‐.55 and κ = .47, 95% CI: .28‐.66), and M4 and internal capsule in ICC studies (ICC = .54, 95% CI: .43‐.64 and ICC = .55, 95% CI: .18‐.91) had the lowest agreement.ConclusionThis meta‐analysis demonstrates substantial to excellent interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS, which supports using this method for stroke treatment. However, findings emphasize the need to consider interobserver agreement in specific regions of ASPECTS for treatment decisions.

Background The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤2 (functional independence) has been the most common primary endpoint of modern mechanical thrombectomy (MT) trials. However, unlike mRS 0-1, mRS score of 2 indicates disability. An important proportion of the mRS 2 patients are home dependent and report a significant decrease in their quality of life. Purpose To investigate excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) rates after MT. Methods We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the role of modern MT in acute ischemic stroke were screened. Posterior circulation and large-core infarct trials were excluded from the study. The data regarding excellent outcomes (mRS: 0-1), functional independence (mRS: 0-2), and reperfusion were collected. Results Twenty-two RCTs comprising 5692 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mRS 0-1 rate was 31.24% (95% CI = 26.95–36.2). The rate of successful reperfusion was 81.8% (95% CI = 77.93–85.86). MT achieved significantly higher rates of mRS 0-1 compared to standard care alone (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.64–2.55; P-value < 0.001), with no heterogeneity detected among studies (I 2 = 0%; P-value = 0.52). The direct MT and MT plus intravenous thrombolytic treatment groups’ excellent outcome rates were comparable (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.82–1.18; P-value = 0.863). Also, aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy techniques provided similar excellent outcome rates (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.55–1.05; P-value = 0.141). Conclusions Our results prove the additional benefit of MT over standard care, using a stricter definition for favorable functional outcome. Nearly one-third of patients presenting with large artery occlusion and treated with MT had no disability at 90 days. While this is remarkable, our results also indicate that reperfusion alone is often not enough to prevent disability and underline the need for better neuroprotection strategies.