Back to Authors

De Luigi, Arthur J

0000-0003-4610-529X

Mayo Clinic

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Citations 2

The effects on sports performance of technologic advances in sports prostheses and wheelchairs
Luigi, Arthur Jason De , De Luigi, Arthur J

PM&R | March 28, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 409-417

10.1002/pmrj.13153 Get It

Abstract The field of medicine continues to advance as new technologies emerge. These technological advancements include the science of sports prostheses and wheelchairs, in which there have been significant advancements over the past decades. The world of adaptive sports continues to expand, largely due to a combination of the increase in awareness, inclusion, and technology. As participation in sports for people with impairments increases, there has been an associated demand for new, innovative adaptive sporting equipment designs that help accommodate the physical deficits of the individual. Controversy has risen as persons with disabilities advance their skills with adaptive sports equipment to compete with individuals without disabilities. The controversy leads to the question: is the adaptive equipment allowing athletes with disability to regain the lost function from their baseline or does it allow them to exceed prior ability level? This narrative review provides information regarding the performance effects of advances in technology and biomechanics of adaptive sports equipment to help answer these questions.
Consensus statement: An evidence‐based review of exercise, rehabilitation, rest, and return to activity protocols for the treatment of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury
Luigi, Arthur Jason De , Bell, Kathleen , Bramhall, Joe P., Choe, Meeryo , Dec, Katherine L., Halstead, Mark, Herring, Stanley A., Matuszak, Jason, Raksin, P B , Swanson, Jennifer, Millett, Carolyn, De Luigi, Arthur J , Bell, Kathleen , Finnoff, Jonathan T. , Halstead, Mark, Swanson, Jennifer, Millett, Carolyn

PM&R | October 5, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1605-1642

10.1002/pmrj.13070 Get It

Abstract Background Early diagnosis and appropriate management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is critical for preventing poor outcomes and minimizing health care burden. Current clinical guidelines for concussion management focus mostly on diagnosis and return to cognitive and physical activity but provide limited guidance on the use of specific therapeutic interventions. Objective To systematically review the available evidence on therapeutic interventions for concussion/mTBI and develop an evidence‐based consensus statement on the use of these interventions in clinical practice. Literature Survey A systematic literature search was performed first in 2018 and 2019, and again in 2022, to identify relevant original research on these interventions. A total of 6303 articles were retrieved through the systematic literature search and screened for inclusion. Eighty articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review and consensus process. Methodology A multispecialty panel was convened to explore management of concussion/mTBI. Interventions evaluated included rest, exercise, rehabilitation, and return to activity (RTA) protocols. Studies were assessed for relevance and methodologic quality and were voted upon to develop an evidence‐based consensus statement on the therapeutic appropriateness of these interventions for concussion/mTBI. A meta‐analysis was not performed. Synthesis There was sufficient evidence to recommend exercise as an appropriate therapy for adolescents with acute concussion/mTBI. In other age groups and for other therapeutic modalities, although some studies demonstrated benefits for some of the interventions, mixed results and study limitations prevented the panel from drawing firm conclusions on the efficacy of those interventions. The panel found evidence of detrimental effects from strict rest and high‐intensity physical activity. Conclusions The panel recommended exercise as an appropriate therapy for acute concussion in adolescents. The evidence on other therapeutic interventions for concussion/mTBI remains limited to small randomized controlled trials and observational studies of moderate to low quality. The panel found no strong evidence to support or recommend against the other evaluated interventions but found most interventions to be safe when used judiciously and in consideration of individual patient needs. High‐quality randomized studies with sufficient power are needed to evaluate the effects of rest, rehabilitation, and RTA protocols for the management of concussion/mTBI.