Back to Authors

Garner, Jennifer

0000-0001-9735-294X

Mayo Clinic

The School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus OH.

Citations 2

Association of Socioeconomic Status With Life's Essential 8 in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Effect Modification by Sex
Williams, Amaris , Nolan, Timiya S. , Luthy, Jacsen, Brewer, LaPrincess C. , Ortiz, Robin , Sánchez, Eduardo , Nawaz, Saira , Garner, Jennifer , Joseph, Joshua J. , Brock, Guy , Garner, Jennifer , Walker, Daniel M , Joseph, Joshua J , Brewer, LaPrincess C , Nolan, Timiya S , Luthy, Jacsen, Venkatesh, Kartik Kailas , Brock, Guy , Gray, Darrell M.

Journal of the American Heart Association | February 13, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.030805 Get It

Background Higher scores for the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 (LE8) metrics, blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, sleep, and diet, are associated with lower risk of chronic disease. Socioeconomic status (SES; employment, insurance, education, and income) is associated with LE8 scores, but there is limited understanding of potential differences by sex. This analysis quantifies the association of SES with LE8 for each sex, within Hispanic Americans, non‐Hispanic Asian Americans, non‐Hispanic Black Americans, and non‐Hispanic White Americans. Methods and Results Using cross‐sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, years 2011 to 2018, LE8 scores were calculated (range, 0–100). Age‐adjusted linear regression quantified the association of SES with LE8 score. The interaction of sex with SES in the association with LE8 score was assessed in each racial and ethnic group. The US population representatively weighted sample (13 529 observations) was aged ≥20 years (median, 48 years). The association of education and income with LE8 scores was higher in women compared with men for non‐Hispanic Black Americans and non‐Hispanic White Americans ( P for all interactions <0.05). Among non‐Hispanic Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans, the association of SES with LE8 was not different between men and women, and women had greater LE8 scores than men at all SES levels (eg, high school or less, some college, and college degree or more). Conclusions The factors that explain the sex differences among non‐Hispanic Black Americans and non‐Hispanic White Americans, but not non‐Hispanic Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans, are critical areas for further research to advance cardiovascular health equity.
Association of Socioeconomic Status With Life's Essential 8 Varies by Race and Ethnicity
Williams, Amaris , Nolan, Timiya S. , Garner, Jennifer , Brewer, LaPrincess C. , Sánchez, Eduardo , Joseph, Joshua J. , Brock, Guy , Garner, Jennifer , Brewer, LaPrincess C , Sanchez, Eduardo J , Joseph, Joshua J , Nolan, Timiya S , Brock, Guy

Journal of the American Heart Association | September 13, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 18 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.122.029254 Get It

Background The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8) are 8 risk factors for cardiovascular disease, with poor attainment across all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. Attainment is lowest among Americans of low socioeconomic status (SES). Evidence suggests the association of SES with LE8 may vary by race and ethnicity. Methods and Results The association of 4 SES categories (education, income‐to‐poverty line ratio, employment, insurance) with LE8 was computed in age‐adjusted linear regression models, with an interaction term for race and ethnicity, using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, years 2011 to 2018. The sample (n=13 529) had a median age of 48 years (51% female) with weighting to be representative of the US population. The magnitude of positive association of college education (relative to ≤high school) with LE8 was greater among non‐Hispanic White Americans (NHWA) compared with non‐Hispanic Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, and non‐Hispanic Asian Americans (all interactions P <0.001). NHWA had a greater magnitude of positive association of income‐to‐poverty line ratio with LE8, compared with non‐Hispanic Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, and non‐Hispanic Asian Americans (all interactions P <0.001). NHWA with Medicaid compared with private insurance had a greater magnitude of negative association with LE8 compared with non‐Hispanic Black Americans, non‐Hispanic Asian Americans, or Hispanic Americans (all interactions P <0.01). NHWA unemployed due to disability or health condition (compared with employed) had a greater magnitude of negative association with LE8 than non‐Hispanic Black Americans, non‐Hispanic Asian Americans, or Hispanic Americans (all interactions P <0.05). Conclusions The magnitude of association of SES with LE8 is greatest among NHWA. More research is needed on SES's role in LE8 attainment in minority group populations.