Grönemeyer, Dietrich

Background Quantification of coronary artery calcified plaques by electron-beam CT (EBCT) may predict cardiovascular events. However, whereas advanced coronary atherosclerotic plaques can be identified, mildly stenotic lipid-rich (soft) plaques may be difficult to detect. The value of EBCT in a subgroup of patients has therefore been questioned. To investigate this, we evaluated patients with acute coronary syndromes by EBCT and compared the results with coronary angiography and, in patients with an indeterminate angiogram, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS). Methods and Results EBCT was performed in 118 consecutive patients (57±11 years of age) with previous myocardial infarction (n=101) or unstable angina (n=17). A standard protocol requiring a CT density >130 Hounsfield units in an area ≥1.03 mm 2 was used for the definition of coronary artery calcium. We found that 110 patients had moderate to severe coronary artery disease by coronary angiography, and 8 had either mildly stenotic plaques at a single site (4 patients, confirmed by ICUS) or nonatherosclerotic causes of the unstable coronary syndrome (4 patients). One hundred and five of the 110 patients (96%) with moderate to severe angiographic disease but only 1 of the 8 other patients (13%) had a positive EBCT. Patients with acute coronary syndromes and negative EBCTs were significantly younger than patients with positive EBCTs (46±12 versus 58±10 years, P <.001), and a higher percentage was actively smoking (100% of the smokers versus 46%, P <.05). Conclusions The vast majority of patients with acute coronary syndromes and at least moderate angiographic disease have identifiable coronary calcium by EBCT. Those patients with negative EBCTs have minimal or no atherosclerotic plaque formation. They are younger and tend to be active cigarette smokers.

Purpose Few options are available for pain relief in patients with bone metastases who fail standard treatments. We sought to determine the benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing pain relief for patients with refractory pain secondary to metastases involving bone. Patients and Methods Thirty-one US and 12 European patients with painful osteolytic metastases involving bone were treated with image-guided RFA using a multitip needle. Treated patients had ≥ 4/10 pain and had either failed or were poor candidates for standard treatments such as radiation or opioid analgesics. Using the Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, worst pain intensity was the primary end point, with a 2-unit drop considered clinically significant. Results Forty-three patients were treated (median follow-up, 16 weeks). Before RFA, the mean score for worst pain was 7.9 (range, 4/10 to 10/10). Four, 12, and 24 weeks following treatment, worst pain decreased to 4.5 (P < .0001), 3.0 (P < .0001), and 1.4 (P = .0005), respectively. Ninety-five percent (41 of 43 patients) experienced a decrease in pain that was considered clinically significant. Opioid usage significantly decreased at weeks 8 and 12. Adverse events were seen in 3 patients and included (1) a second-degree skin burn at the grounding pad site, (2) transient bowel and bladder incontinence following treatment of a metastasis involving the sacrum, and (3) a fracture of the acetabulum following RFA of an acetabular lesion. Conclusion RFA of painful osteolytic metastases provides significant pain relief for cancer patients who have failed standard treatments.