Liu, Lili

Rationale Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency, a rare, highly heritable trait, is associated with frequent pulmonary infections, emphysema, airway changes and low lung function; however, it is unclear if reduced IgA levels may affect lung structure and function. Methods Serum IgA, IgA1 and galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) levels were measured in the population-based Multi-Ethnic Study on Atherosclerosis (MESA). The MESA Lung Study measured percent emphysema on cardiac CT and airway dimensions on chest CT, and performed spirometry. Regression models were evaluated after adjustment for demographic and CT factors. Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses were conducted using genetic variants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) programme. A replication analysis was performed in the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures In COPD Study (SPIROMICS). Measurements and main results Among 5497 participants, lower log-normalised serum IgA levels were associated with greater percent emphysema (β=−0.084; 95% CI −0.14 to –0.026; p=0.005), which was confirmed on MR (β=−0.79; 95% CI −1.4 to –0.18; p=0.011). Greater log-normalised serum Gd-IgA1 levels were associated with airway wall thickness (β=0.0079; 95% CI 0.0017 to 0.014; p=0.012; n=2580) and decline in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (β=−0.012; 95% CI −0.021 to –0.0036; p=0.0055; n=2778) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (β=−0.0028; 95% CI −0.0048 to –0.00084; p=0.0054; n=2778). Conclusion Lower serum IgA levels were associated with greater percent emphysema. Additionally, higher Gd-IgA1 levels were associated with airway wall thickness and lung function decline. These findings support a protective role of IgA in emphysema pathogenesis and possible deleterious role of Gd-IgA1 in airway diseases.

Background The 2021 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend following anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody levels as a marker of treatment response in membranous nephropathy; however, the optimal timing to evaluate antibody levels and how to combine them with other clinical variables are currently unknown. Methods We used a cohort of 85 patients from the Membranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab (MENTOR) with anti-PLA2R antibodies ≥14 RU/ml to identify risk factors for not experiencing proteinuria remission after 12 months of treatment with cyclosporine or rituximab. Three landmark times were considered: at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Logistic regression model performance was evaluated using C-statistics and model fit (Akaike information criterion [AIC], R 2 ). Results The model at baseline that best predicted no remission included anti-PLA2R antibodies >323 RU/ml and creatinine clearance; the best model after 3 months included the change from baseline in both antibody and albumin levels; and the best model after 6 months included antibody levels >14 RU/ml, creatinine clearance, and the change from baseline in albumin. Compared with the model at baseline, the model at 3 months had better model fit (AIC 70.9 versus 96.4, R 2 51.8% versus 30.1%) and higher C-statistic (0.93 versus 0.83, P = 0.008). The model at 6 months had no difference in performance compared with the model at 3 months (AIC 68.6, R 2 53.0%, C-statistic 0.94, P = 0.67). Conclusions In patients with membranous nephropathy treated with cyclosporine or rituximab in the MENTOR trial, we found that the optimal method to evaluate risk factors for the probability of treatment response was to use anti-PLA2R antibody levels combined with albumin levels after 3 months of treatment, which was significantly better than using antibody levels alone or risk factor evaluation at baseline, with no added benefit of waiting until 6 months of treatment. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_10_09_CJN0000000000000237.mp3