Back to Authors

Koutsavlis, Ioannis

0000-0002-6379-1298

Mayo Clinic

Western General Hospital, Lothian Health Board, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Citations 1

Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial
Harrison, Claire , Nangalia, Jyoti , Boucher, Rebecca H. , Jackson, Aimee , Yap, Christina , O’Sullivan, Jennifer , Fox, Sonia, Ailts, Isaak , Dueck, Amylou C. , Geyer, Holly L. , Nadezhdin, Eugene, Curto‐García, Natalia , Green, Anna , Wilkins, Bridget S., Coppell, Jason, Laurie, John , Garg, Mamta , Ewing, Joanne, Knapper, Steven , Crowe, Josephine , Koutsavlis, Ioannis , Godfrey, Anna L. , Arami, Siamak , Drummond, Mark W., Clark, Fiona , Mead‐Harvey, Carolyn , Baxter, E. Joanna , Mead, Adam J. , Dueck, A. C. , Harrison, Claire N , Boucher, Rebecca , Mesa, Ruben , Dunn, William G , Garg, Mamta , Knapper, Steven , Crowe, Josephine , Koutsavlis, Ioannis , Arami, Siamak , Byrne, Jennifer , Baxter, Elizabeth Joanna , McMullin, Mary Frances , Mead, Adam J , Yap, Christina , Mesa, Ruben A. , Dunn, William G. , Chen, Frederick , Byrne, Jenny , McMullin, Mary Frances

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 1, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 3534-3544

10.1200/jco.22.01935 Get It

PURPOSE Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by JAK/STAT activation, thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, systemic symptoms, and disease transformation. In high-risk PV, ruxolitinib controls blood counts and improves symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS MAJIC-PV is a randomized phase II trial of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC-INT/RES). Primary outcome was complete response (CR) within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included duration of response, event-free survival (EFS), symptom, and molecular response. RESULTS One hundred eighty patients were randomly assigned. CR was achieved in 40 (43%) patients on ruxolitinib versus 23 (26%) on BAT (odds ratio, 2.12; 90% CI, 1.25 to 3.60; P = .02). Duration of CR was superior for ruxolitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.61; P < .001). Symptom responses were better with ruxolitinib and durable. EFS (major thrombosis, hemorrhage, transformation, and death) was superior for patients attaining CR within 1 year (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78; P = .01); and those on ruxolitinib (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P = .03). Serial analysis of JAK2V617F variant allele fraction revealed molecular response was more frequent with ruxolitinib and was associated with improved outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] P = .001, EFS P = .001, overall survival P = .01) and clearance of JAK2V617F stem/progenitor cells. ASXL1 mutations predicted for adverse EFS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.47 to 6.17; P = .003). The safety profile of ruxolitinib was as previously reported. CONCLUSION The MAJIC-PV study demonstrates ruxolitinib treatment benefits HC-INT/RES PV patients with superior CR, and EFS as well as molecular response; importantly also demonstrating for the first time, to our knowledge, that molecular response is linked to EFS, PFS, and OS.