Mohan, Sumit

Key Points Nonimmunologic AKI-related rehospitalizations post–kidney transplant are associated with poorer long-term allograft and recipient outcomes. These data are not reported to United Network for Organ Sharing, and there are no datasets highlighting this important association; thus, our findings are valuable to clinicians. We hope to help the community create a cohort of higher risk transplant patients who need closer monitoring to potentially increase graft longevity Background AKI is associated with an increased risk of CKD and ESKD. However, only limited studies have investigated the effect of AKI episodes on kidney transplant outcomes. This study evaluated the effect of rehospitalization associated with nonimmunologic AKI on long-term outcomes. Data on rehospitalization with AKI after kidney transplant are not reported to United Network for Organ Sharing, and thus, there are no large datasets available to study this association. Methods We completed chart reviews of 989 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients transplanted from 2010 to 2014 at 13 transplant centers in the Deceased Donor Study Consortium. Rehospitalizations up to 5 years post-transplant were included. The cause of rehospitalizations was adjudicated by a transplant nephrologist on the basis of the discharge diagnosis. Primary outcomes were the effect of AKI-related rehospitalization on death-censored graft failure and all-cause mortality. We excluded rehospitalizations because of acute rejection from the primary analysis. The cohort was linked to data from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network supplied by United Network for Organ Sharing. Time-varying cox-proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between rehospitalization and outcomes. Results We identified 200 (20%) recipients with at least one rehospitalization associated with AKI, 516 (52%) with rehospitalizations without AKI, and 273 (28%) without a rehospitalization post-transplant. Delayed graft function, donor age, and kidney donor profile index score differed between the three groups. We found a higher risk of death censored graft failure adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 7.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 13.8), all-cause graft failure aHR 6.7 (95% CI, 4.2 to 10.8), and all-cause mortality aHR 5.7 (95% CI, 2.7 to 11.8) for rehospitalizations associated with AKI compared with no rehospitalization. The non-AKI rehospitalizations also had significantly higher rates of measured outcomes; however, the associations were not as strong. Conclusions AKI rehospitalizations were associated with a significantly increased risk of poorer graft outcomes, and thus, closer follow-up of this high-risk group is warranted.

Abstract Introduction Significant center‐to‐center variation in attitudes and management of delayed graft function (DGF) remains common. Methods A survey to describe current DGF practices was developed by workgroup members sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and was distributed to both the NKF DGF workgroup members, kidney transplant program directors and the transplant community within the United States and Canada. Seventy‐one percent of NKF workgroup members completed the survey along with 70 unique the United States and three Canadian kidney transplant programs. All Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions were represented. Results DGF was reported to occur at rate of 20%–40% for most centers with 3.9% indicating their incidence to be >60%. Most centers reported longer hospital lengths of stay and more frequent outpatient visits. Despite the commonality of DGF, only half of centers reported having an established protocol to manage DGF. Kidney allograft biopsies were the only consistent DGF management strategy observed, although use of machine perfusion was also heavily favored. Other DGF management strategies voiced by a minority included having established outpatient practices to care for DGF patients and administering outpatient community‐based hemodialysis. Conclusion Although approximately a third of survey responders indicated that risk of DGF played a role in their willingness to accept organs, most did not feel that increased cost or clinical impact on outcomes was a deterrent. Future strategies, including broader sharing of best practices, redefining terminology specific to DGF, the establishment of DGF dialysis guidelines and improving access to machine perfusion across OPOs may help reduce discard and improve utilization of kidneys at risk for DGF.