Fadel, Paul J

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a widely utilized approach for investigating cardiovascular health and human performance. Methodological approaches, analyses, and interpretations of HRV can vary extensively, and scientific debates on HRV reliability and utility remain. These debates have been amplified in recent years by the rapid growth and ubiquity of wearable devices, and their incorporation into scientific research studies. The present guidelines paper takes an evidence-based approach to propose more consistent and rigorous measurement and interpretation of HRV within human cardiovascular research and application. First, HRV has some utility as a cardiovascular risk stratification tool, but is not appropriate to employ as a specific marker of cardiac sympathetic outflow or sympathovagal balance. While time-domain and spectral analysis can more accurately reflect respiratory modulation of cardiac vagal (parasympathetic) activity, caution is necessary to avoid overinterpretation, particularly with respect to the concept of “vagal tone”. Numerous experimental, demographic, and environmental factors influence HRV assessment, interpretation, and reliability. Specifically, it is critical to account for non-modifiable (age, sex, race/ethnicity, etc.) and modifiable (i.e., exercise, physical fitness, etc.) factors within participant samples. Furthermore, technical approaches such as the HRV input signal (e.g., electrocardiography vs. photoplethysmography), length of recording, location of recordings (i.e., laboratory vs. field), respiratory rate and depth, and analytical approaches (i.e., time vs. frequency domain) can all impact rigor, reliability, and study interpretations. Finally, with respect to the rapid advancements of HRV assessment using wearable technology, investigators should interpret and contextualize findings within the limitations outlined in this guideline review.

Insulin acts centrally to stimulate sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow to skeletal muscle and peripherally to promote vasodilation. Given these divergent actions, the “net effect” of insulin on the transduction of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) into vasoconstriction and thus, blood pressure (BP) remains unclear. We hypothesized that sympathetic transduction to BP would be attenuated during hyperinsulinemia compared with baseline. In 22 young healthy adults, MSNA (microneurography), and beat-to-beat BP (Finometer or arterial catheter) were continuously recorded, and signal-averaging was performed to quantify the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and total vascular conductance (TVC; Modelflow) responses following spontaneous bursts of MSNA at baseline and during a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Hyperinsulinemia significantly increased MSNA burst frequency and mean burst amplitude (baseline: 46 ± 6 au; insulin: 65 ± 16 au, P < 0.001) but did not alter MAP. The peak MAP (baseline: 3.2 ± 1.5 mmHg; insulin: 3.0 ± 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.67) and nadir TVC ( P = 0.45) responses following all MSNA bursts were not different between conditions indicating preserved sympathetic transduction. However, when MSNA bursts were segregated into quartiles based on their amplitudes at baseline and compared with similar amplitude bursts during hyperinsulinemia, the peak MAP and TVC responses were blunted (e.g., largest burst quartile: MAP, baseline: Δ4.4 ± 1.7 mmHg; hyperinsulinemia: Δ3.0 ± 0.8 mmHg, P = 0.02). Notably, ∼15% of bursts during hyperinsulinemia exceeded the size of any burst at baseline, yet the MAP/TVC responses to these larger bursts (MAP, Δ4.9 ± 1.4 mmHg) did not differ from the largest baseline bursts ( P = 0.47). These findings indicate that increases in MSNA burst amplitude contribute to the overall maintenance of sympathetic transduction during hyperinsulinemia.

The introduction of duplex Doppler ultrasound almost half a century ago signified a revolutionary advance in the ability to assess limb blood flow in humans. It is now widely used to assess blood flow under a variety of experimental conditions to study skeletal muscle resistance vessel function. Despite its pervasive adoption, there is substantial variability between studies in relation to experimental protocols, procedures for data analysis, and interpretation of findings. This guideline results from a collegial discussion among physiologists and pharmacologists, with the goal of providing general as well as specific recommendations regarding the conduct of human studies involving Doppler ultrasound-based measures of resistance vessel function in skeletal muscle. Indeed, the focus is on methods used to assess resistance vessel function and not upstream conduit artery function (i.e., macrovasculature), which has been expertly reviewed elsewhere. In particular, we address topics related to experimental design, data collection, and signal processing as well as review common procedures used to assess resistance vessel function, including postocclusive reactive hyperemia, passive limb movement, acute single limb exercise, and pharmacological interventions. Listen to this article’s corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/guidelines-for-doppler-ultrasound-and-resistance-vessel-function/ .