Back to Authors

Carlson, Matthew L

0000-0002-1402-7461

Mayo Clinic

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 27

A framework for quality measurement in the presurgical care of chronic rhinosinusitis: a review from the Quality Improvement Committee of the American Rhinologic Society
Mattos, José L. , Rudmik, Luke , Manes, Peter R., Lee, Jivianne, Schneider, John S. , Setzen, Michael, Parasher, Arjun K. , Smith, Timothy L. , Stokken, Janalee K., Stokken, Janalee K. , Smith, Timothy L , Carlson, Matthew L , Mattos, Jose , Soler, Zachary M. , Higgins, Thomas S , Lee, Jivianne T.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 3, 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1380-1388

10.1002/alr.22154 Get It

BackgroundQuality improvement (QI) in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is garnering increasing attention. Defining frameworks and metrics to assess the quality of key components in CRS management could assist in reducing unwarranted practice variation and increase high‐quality care.MethodsA panel of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) QI committee reviewed the literature to determine important presurgical components of CRS care that warrant QI. The evidence was organized into 4 categories: (1) diagnosis, (2) medical management, (3) appropriate patient selection for surgery, and (4) patient‐centered discussion. The combination of these categories was used to develop a framework termed the CRS Appropriate Presurgical Algorithm (CAPA).ResultsPrior to offering surgery for CRS, the best available evidence support the following quality metrics: (1) a guideline‐based diagnosis should be confirmed; (2) appropriate medical management, including a minimum of topical corticosteroid therapy and saline irrigations, should have been attempted (assuming patient tolerance); (3) a computed tomography (CT) scan should be obtained (to confirm the presence of sinus inflammation and for surgical planning); and (4) a patient‐centered discussion regarding treatment options for refractory CRS (ie, alternative medical therapies vs surgery vs observation) while focusing on risks and benefits, the need for long‐term medical compliance, and understanding of patient preferences and expectations.ConclusionDefining metrics that assess key components to CRS care prior to offering surgery has the potential to further improve upon an already successful treatment paradigm, reduce unwarranted practice variation, and to ensure that patients are receiving a similar level of high‐quality care.
Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Orbital Apex Cavernous Hemangioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
Marcellino, Chris , Peris‐Celda, Maria , Link, Michael J. , Stokken, Janalee K., Stokken, Janalee K. , Marcellino, Chris R, Marcellino, Christopher , Carlson, Matthew L

Operative Neurosurgery | July 31, 2018 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 5 | Pages: E144-E145

10.1093/ons/opy192 Get It

Abstract A 52-yr-old woman was referred to a tertiary medical center for evaluation of 2 yr of progressive visual symptoms and 1 yr of retro-orbital pressure. Her ophthalmologic exam was unrevealing except for mild asymmetrical impairment in color perception. A gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image of the head showed a left extraconal orbital apex lesion consistent with cavernous hemangioma. Computed tomography reveled bony remodeling of the medial-inferior orbital walls with superior orbital fissure expansion. The lesion was endoscopically resected and confirmed by pathological analysis. The endoscopic approach is demonstrated in detail, including correlation with cadaveric anatomic specimens ‡ . During the approach, a rescue nasoseptal flap was raised in case the orbit required further support after tumor resection, but was replaced as this was not needed. This patient had a brief period of postoperative diplopia, which resolved 1 wk after surgery. Her subjective visual deficits and pressure have also resolved. Advantages of the endoscopic approach include improved direct visualization of the lesion, lack of external skin incisions, avoidance of significant neurovascular retraction, and shorter hospital stays than alternative orbitotomy or craniotomy approaches. This 4-handed approach demands endoscopic expertise of 2 surgeons, and is often performed by rhinology-neurosurgery or rhinology-ophthalmology surgical teams. The risk of postoperative diplopia should be discussed with the patient during informed consent. ‡ Anatomic specimen photography courtesy Dr Peris-Celda.
Rhinology‐specific priority setting for quality improvement: a modified Delphi study from the Quality Improvement Committee of the American Rhinologic Society
Rudmik, Luke , Mattos, José L. , Stokken, Janalee K., Manes, R. Peter , Setzen, Michael, Lee, Jivianne, Schneider, John S. , Stokken, Janalee K. , Soler, Zachary M. , Higgins, Thomas S , Lee, Jivianne T. , Carlson, Matthew L , Mattos, Jose

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | August 11, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 937-944

10.1002/alr.21998 Get It

BackgroundImproving the quality of healthcare is a complex and resource intensive process. To optimize the allocation of scarce resources, quality improvement (QI) should focus on high‐value diseases that will produce the largest improvement in health system performance. Given the breadth and multidisciplinary nature of sinonasal disease management, the purpose of this study was to transparently develop a prioritized list of sinonasal diseases for QI from the perspective of the specialty of rhinology and the American Rhinologic Society (ARS).MethodsThe RAND modified Delphi methodology was used to rank the priority of nine sinonasal disease categories from 1 (lowest priority) to 9 (highest priority). Two rounds of ranking along with a teleconference meeting was performed by a panel of 9 experts from the ARS Quality Improvement Committee.ResultsThe final QI‐prioritized list of sinonasal diseases are as follows: chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) (mean score = 8.9), recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) (mean score = 7.9), sinonasal neoplasms (mean score = 7.0), anatomic nasal obstruction (mean score = 5.9), refractory epistaxis (mean score = 5.2), complicated acute rhinosinusitis (mean score = 5.2), chronic nonallergic rhinitis (mean score = 4.4), orbital disease (mean score = 4.3), uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (mean score = 4.1), and allergy/allergic rhinitis (mean score = 3.7).ConclusionThe three most important disease categories for QI from the perspective of the specialty of rhinology were CRS, RARS, and sinonasal neoplasms. Future studies need to define and validate quality metrics for each of these important disease categories in order to facilitate appropriate measurement and improvement initiatives.
Quality measurement for rhinosinusitis: a review from the Quality Improvement Committee of the American Rhinologic Society
Rudmik, Luke , Mattos, José L. , Schneider, John S. , Manes, Peter R., Stokken, Janalee K., Lee, Jivianne, Schlosser, Rodney J. , Reh, Douglas D., Setzen, Michael, Stokken, Janalee K. , Lee, Jivianne T. , Higgins, Thomas S , Soler, Zachary M. , Schlosser, Rodney J , Carlson, Matthew L , Mattos, Jose

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 853-860

10.1002/alr.21983 Get It

BackgroundMeasuring quality outcomes is an important prerequisite to improve quality of care. Rhinosinusitis represents a high value target to improve quality of care because it has a high prevalence of disease, large economic burden, and large practice variation. In this study we review the current state of quality measurement for management of both acute (ARS) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).MethodsThe major national quality metric repositories and clearinghouses were queried. Additional searches included the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery database, PubMed, and Google to attempt to capture any additional quality metrics.ResultsSeven quality metrics for ARS and 4 quality metrics for CRS were identified. ARS metrics focused on appropriateness of diagnosis (n = 1), antibiotic prescribing (n = 4), and radiologic imaging (n = 2). CRS quality metrics focused on appropriateness of diagnosis (n = 1), radiologic imaging (n = 1), and measurement of patient quality of life (n = 2). The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) currently tracks 3 ARS quality metrics and 1 CRS quality metric. There are no outcome‐based rhinosinusitis quality metrics and no metrics that assess domains of safety, patient‐centeredness, and timeliness of care.ConclusionsThe current status of quality measurement for rhinosinusitis has focused primarily on the quality domain of efficiency and process measures for ARS. More work is needed to develop, validate, and track outcome‐based quality metrics along with CRS‐specific metrics. Although there has been excellent work done to improve quality measurement for rhinosinusitis, there remain major gaps and challenges that need to be considered during the development of future metrics.
Role of Lumbar Drains in Contemporary Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
D’Anza, Brian , Tien, Due, Stokken, Janalee K., Recinos, Pablo F. , Woodard, Troy D. , Sindwani, Raj , Stokken, Janalee K. , Carlson, Matthew L , Recinos, Pablo F

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy | November 22, 2016 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 430-435

10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4377 Get It

Background Historically, lumbar drains (LD) have played a prominent role in endonasal skull base surgery. Over the past few decades, advancements in techniques have augmented our ability to successfully reconstruct complex skull base defects and often obviates the need for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Clarity on the appropriate use of LDs is needed. Objective To examine the literature for the need for LDs in contemporary skull base reconstruction after resection of skull base tumors. Methods A systematic literature review of English language articles by using PubMed and Ovid. Search terms included “lumbar drain,” “CSF leak,” and “endoscopic endonasal reconstruction.” Articles were included when they pertained to adults, used current methods for reconstruction (i.e., multilayered repair or vascularized tissue), and addressed CSF leak rates secondary to endoscopic resection of skull base masses. All the studies discussed CSF leaks that resulted from traumatic-, idiopathic-, or sinus surgery-related iatrogenic causes were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Results A total of five articles met inclusion criteria. These comprised 376 endoscopic skull base tumor resection and reconstruction cases; 5.59% developed postoperative CSF leaks. A meta-analysis was conducted by incorporating three studies that met criteria based on testing for heterogeneity. The average odds ratio for postoperative CSF leak for patients who did not have an LD relative to patients who had an LD was 0.590 (95% confidence interval, 0.214–1.630). Given a p value of 0.30, the results demonstrated a lack of statistically significant improvement between patients who had an LD and patients who did not have an LD. Various details, such as the defect size and type of CSF leak, were not consistently reported among studies. Conclusions Available evidence for the use of LDs in skull base surgery is of poor quality. Analysis of the literature revealed heterogenous and varied reporting in the primary literature. Further studies that include randomized controlled trials are needed.
Chronic invasive fungal sinusitis: characterization and shift in management of a rare disease
D’Anza, Brian , Stokken, Janalee K., Greene, J. Scott , Kennedy, Thomas L., Woodard, Troy D. , Sindwani, Raj , Stokken, Janalee K. , Carlson, Matthew L

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | July 27, 2016 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1294-1300

10.1002/alr.21828 Get It

BackgroundChronic invasive fungal sinusitis (CIFS) is a rare subtype of mycotic diseases involving the paranasal sinuses. It is characterized by a slow onset and invasive organisms with non‐granulomatous inflammation seen on histopathology. Historically, treatment has involved radical surgical resection. The purpose of this study was to describe the presentation, comorbidities, and role of more conservative treatment options.MethodsThis is a multi‐institutional retrospective case series of 6 patients with CIFS over 15 years. Patients’ medical comorbidities, imaging results, operative procedures, pathological findings including organisms identified, antimicrobial medications used, and outcomes were reviewed.ResultsThe mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 6 months. Cultures and fungal PCR identified Aspergillus species in every case. All 6 patients were found to have systemic comorbidities, with many being diabetic. Imaging findings ranged from thickening of sinus mucosa to invasion of the orbit and skull base. Treatment included long‐term antifungal therapy and conservative endoscopic surgery in all but 1 patient, who had an open approach. Every patient was free of invasive fungal disease at last follow‐up, with a range of 1 to 27 months.ConclusionCIFS is an insidious disease often with months between symptom onset and diagnosis. It is differentiated from chronic granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis (CGIFS) by a lack of granulomas on histopathology and an association with diabetes mellitus. Endoscopic debridement combined with long‐term oral voriconazole was an effective treatment strategy in this series.
Three-dimensional Printing of Large Nasal Septal Perforations for Optimal Prosthetic Closure
Altunay, Zeynep Önerci , Bly, Joseph A., Edwards, Philip K., Holmes, David R. , O’Brien, Erin K. , Carr, Alan B. , Camp, Jon J. , Stokken, Janalee K., Pallanch, John F., Stokken, Janalee K. , Hamilton, Grant , O'Brien, Erin K , Carlson, Matthew L

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy | July 22, 2016 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 287-293

10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4324 Get It

Background Since 1972, patients with large nasal perforations, who were symptomatic, and who were not candidates for surgery, had the option of custom prosthetic closure at Mayo Clinic. Although septal prostheses have helped many patients, 27% of pre-1982 patients chose not to keep the prosthesis in place. Two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) sizing resulted in more of the patients choosing to retain the prosthesis. The introduction of three-dimensional (3-D) printing to the sizing process offered the potential of further improved retention by refinement in prosthesis fit. Objective To describe the fabrication of nasal septal prostheses by using 3-D printing for sizing and to compare the retention rate of 3-D-sized prostheses with those that used previous sizing methods. Methods Twenty-one consecutive patients who had placement of septal prostheses sized by using 3-D printed templates were studied. CT image data were used to print 3-D templates of the exact shape of the patient's septal perforation, and medical-grade silastic prostheses were fabricated to fit. In four cases, the 3-D printed template allowed preoperative surgical simulation. Metrics collected included prosthesis retention; symptoms, including intranasal crusting and epistaxis; and previous prosthetic closure failures. Results Twenty of the twenty-one patients had improvement in symptoms. The mean diameter of the perforations was 2.4 cm; the mean closure time by the end of the study period was 2.2 years. All but two patients chose to keep their prosthesis in place, for a retention rate of 90%. Seven patients with successful closure had failed previously with prior prosthesis sized without the current 3-D printing methodology. This 90% retention rate exceeded the previous rates before the introduction of 3-D sizing. Conclusion Sizing done by 3-D printing for prosthetic closure of nasal septal perforations resulted in a higher retention rate in helping patients with these most-challenging nasal septal perforations.