Back to Authors

Smischney, Nathan J

0000-0003-1051-098X

Mayo Clinic

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 12

Description of Pharmacogenomic Testing Among Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Cardiovascular Surgery
Peterson, Pamela E., Nicholson, Wayne T. , Moyer, Ann M. , Arendt, Christopher, Smischney, Nathan J. , Seelhammer, Troy G. , Krecke, Catherine, Haney, Rory M., Yaw, Elissa J., Chlan, Linda L. , Arendt, Christopher J, Krecke, Catherine A, Peterson, Pamela , Chlan, Linda L , Smischney, Nathan J

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | July 31, 2020 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1281-1285

10.1177/0885066620946303 Get It

Background: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing has the potential to provide information on specific drug-metabolizing enzymes that may lead to an absence, reduction, or increase in medication effect in patients. There is a paucity of prospective studies examining PGx testing in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Research Aims: To (1) obtain a PGx panel in a sample of cardiovascular (CV) surgical patients with a planned ICU stay and identify phenotypes, and (2) identify PGx variants that may inform treatment regimens and may warrant prescribing adjustments. Design and Methods: Descriptive, single cohort cross-sectional design. Adult (≥18 years) CV patients with an anticipated postoperative ICU stay were enrolled from a large Midwestern tertiary academic medical center. Eligible patients provided informed consent at the time of their CV clinic appointment; PGx testing was then ordered. Pharmacogenomic testing consisted of the Focused Pharmacogenomics panel which included 10 genes and 55 medications. Results: Of the 272 patients screened, 100 (68% male) patients completed PGx testing (mean age 66.2 ± 9.6 years, mean Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation III score 76.1 ± standard deviation). Pharmacogenomic results were available in the medical record within a median of 52.4 hours (interquartile range: 33.4-80.3). Pharmacogenomic testing results identified 5 CYP2C19 poor metabolizers, 26 CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers, 5 CYP2C19 ultrarapid metabolizers, 6 CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, 5 CYP2D6 poor to intermediate metabolizers, and 2 CYP2D6 rapid metabolizers identified. Overall, 98% of patients had actionable or potentially actionable PGx results, including 82% for warfarin, 65% for propafenone, 65% for tramadol, 46% for oxycodone, 45% for metoprolol, 33% for clopidogrel, 32% for proton pump inhibitors, 25% for statins, and 12% for haloperidol. Conclusions: A significant portion of patients had identified genetic variants that may warrant changes in medication management during and after CV-ICU stay. It remains to be seen if PGx testing leads to improvements in ICU patient outcomes.
Effect of Ketamine/Propofol Admixture on Peri-Induction Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Smischney, Nathan J. , Seisa, Mohamed O. , Morrow, Allison S. , Ponce, Oscar J. , Alzuabi, Muayad , Heise, Katherine J., Murad, M. Hassan , Murad, Mohammad H, Murad, M Hassan , Smischney, Nathan J , Ponce, Oscar Josue , Wang, Zhen

Anesthesiology Research and Practice | May 8, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-15

10.1155/2020/9637412 Get It

To evaluate the effectiveness of an admixture of ketamine and propofol on peri-induction hemodynamics during airway manipulation, we searched electronic databases of randomized controlled trials from January 1, 2000, to October 17, 2018. Trial screening, selection, and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers with outcomes pooled across included trials using the random-effects model. We included 10 randomized trials (722 patients, mean age of 53.99 years, 39.96% female). American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status was reported in 9 trials with classes I and II representing the majority. Ketamine/propofol admixture was associated with a nonsignificant increase in heart rate (weighted mean difference, 3.36 beats per minute (95% CI, −0.88, 7.60), I2 = 88.6%), a statistically significant increase in systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, 9.67 mmHg (95% CI, 1.48, 17.86), I2 = 87.2%), a nonsignificant increase in diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, 2.18 mmHg (95% CI, −2.82, 7.19), I2 = 73.1%), and a nonsignificant increase in mean arterial pressure (weighted mean difference, 3.28 mmHg (95% CI, −0.94, 7.49), I2 = 69.9%) compared to other agents. The risk of bias was high and the certainty of evidence was low. In conclusion, among patients undergoing airway manipulation and needing sedation, the use of a ketamine/propofol admixture may be associated with better hemodynamics compared to nonketamine/propofol sedation. This trial is registered with CRD42019125725.