Leung, Jonathan G.

Background: Lithium is a mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder, but its narrow therapeutic index and susceptibility to pharmacokinetic interactions make appropriate monitoring crucial. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide, are increasingly prescribed for type 2 diabetes and weight management. Scarce evidence exists on the potential interaction between semaglutide and lithium. Methods: We present 3 cases involving patients on stable lithium regimens who were initiated on semaglutide, reviewing potential mechanisms underlying the interaction between them. Findings: In 2 cases, lithium levels increased significantly, leading to toxicity despite stable renal function and no changes in concurrent medications. In the third case, preemptive reductions in lithium dosage mitigated toxicity, although lithium levels remained higher than anticipated. Mechanistic hypotheses that might contribute to semaglutide-associated elevated lithium levels include altered kidney function, dehydration from reduced oral intake, vomiting, or diarrhea, and delayed gastric emptying. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the first documented case series describing a potential interaction between semaglutide and lithium in the medical literature. These cases underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring when combining lithium with semaglutide, and potentially other GLP-1 RAs. Baseline renal function, hydration status, and lithium levels should be assessed before initiating semaglutide, and lithium levels should be monitored more frequently during therapy. Clinicians prescribing semaglutide to patients on lithium should exercise caution, monitor for signs of toxicity, and provide appropriate patient education. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of this potential interaction and its clinical significance.

Since the discovery of the first psychoactive medications, their psychiatric and medical uses have overlapped. Designating a medication psychiatric or psychotropic is thus arbitrary, based on its most common usage, but labeling it so obscures the full range of its pharmacologic activity and clinical utility. Psychotropic medications (PMs) are frequently used to treat medical conditions or symptoms in the areas of neurology (e.g., migraine, seizure disorder), dermatology (e.g., itching), gastroenterology, and chronic pain, among many others. It is important for both primary care and specialty physicians to be aware of the potential non-psychiatric indications for the use of common PMs such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. This review examines the potential benefits and risks of PMs when used for non-psychiatric indications, highlighting how their pharmacologic effects on neurotransmitters contribute to both therapeutic outcomes and adverse effects. It also provides guiding principles for prescribers, including the importance of adjusting doses based on the specific indication, monitoring for harmful side effects, considering age-related factors, and addressing the risks associated with polypharmacy.

Abstract Introduction Alice in Wonderland Syndrome (AIWS) is an uncommon condition manifesting visual and somatosensory disturbances in which patients may perceive objects, including their own bodies, as larger or smaller than they are. In adults, AIWS typically is associated with migraine and epilepsy but has been reported as an adverse effect of topiramate, which is used to treat both illnesses, making it difficult to ascertain whether illness or medication causes altered perceptions. Reported is a case of topiramate-associated AIWS, which adds to the limited reports published on this unique phenomenon. Case Report A 40-year-old woman admitted to a 3-week pain rehabilitation program to treat chronic migraine reported macrosomatognosia that she retrospectively recalled beginning during titration of topiramate. The symptoms of AIWS resolved after the topiramate was discontinued. An assessment with the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale indicated a possible association between topiramate and macrosomatognosia. Discussion In this patient with migraine, the onset of AIWS coincided with titration of topiramate, providing a clue that its emergence may have been an adverse drug reaction rather than the underlying illness. Consistent with previous reports, AIWS resolved shortly after topiramate was discontinued, lending credence to this conclusion. However, the mechanism of AIWS is unknown and may be multifactorial, leaving the possibility that migraine predisposed the patient to develop AIWS from topiramate. Conclusion The long association of AIWS with migraine and epilepsy makes it possible that cases caused by medications used to treat these illnesses, like topiramate, are underreported. Awareness of the temporal relationships between the course of illness and the timing of drug therapy can help guide the recognition of AIWS as a potential adverse event.

Abstract Purpose Clozapine is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir brought forth new challenges for those caring for patients prescribed clozapine. Prescribing information describes a consideration for a clozapine dose reduction while monitoring for adverse reactions when clozapine is used with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Other drug information resources consider the combination a contraindication. A case is reported in which therapeutic drug monitoring demonstrated a lack of interaction between clozapine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The complexities of infection-associated clozapine toxicity are discussed and a review is provided of CYP3A4 drug and gene interactions with clozapine. Summary A 75-year-old woman with schizophrenia, prescribed clozapine 200 mg by mouth at bedtime, was initiated on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir after developing a mild COVID-19 infection. Two days later, the patient was brought to the emergency department after an unwitnessed fall. Clozapine toxicity was included in the differential diagnosis, although no other signs or symptoms of elevated clozapine levels were present. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was discontinued. Clozapine was withheld for 1 day while a clozapine level was pending, but this measurement revealed no interaction when compared to a baseline level of clozapine. Conclusion Although there are hypothetical concerns when initiating a CYP3A4 inhibitor with concomitant clozapine, the information derived from this case does not clearly support an interaction with the addition of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir during mild COVID-19 infection. It is important to understand the risks of withholding clozapine, although fortunately no psychiatric concerns developed. In reviewing the literature, CYP3A4 inhibitors or genetic polymorphisms seem to have a minimal impact on clozapine levels, although clinical monitoring is warranted.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo build consensus from different stakeholders on the content and digital interactivity of a shared decision making (SDM) tool to guide patient‐clinician collaborative conversations about treatment for bipolar depression.Patients and MethodsThis study was conducted between September 2022 and September 2023. In the first phase, we conducted a narrative review on pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and psychotherapeutic treatments available for bipolar depression. For each option, we assessed treatment effectiveness, side effects, need for clinical monitoring, clinical considerations, and cost. In the second phase, committees comprised of mental health clinicians and people with lived experience with bipolar disorder from a national mood disorders advocacy group identified key features and content to be included in the SDM tool. A thematic analysis of these data then contributed to populate the SDM tool.ResultsTwenty‐one evidence‐based treatment options identified from the narrative review were presented to the four convened committees (clinical, lived experience, peer council, and integrated steering committees) in five meetings. After discussions and thematic analysis, 12 outcomes of interest for each of the therapeutic interventions were delineated for inclusion in a web‐based SDM tool. A detailed description of the development process and SDM tool is provided.ConclusionThis is the first partnership between clinicians and persons with bipolar disorder lived experience charged with the development of a patient‐centered SDM tool to integrate clinical evidence with real‐world clinical practice and patient preferences for use during clinical encounters. Human‐centered design and testing in real clinical encounters will now contribute to refining the instrument and readying it for rigorous evaluation and implementation in practice.

Abstract Purpose/Background Clozapine was approved in the United States (US) using 1989 regulations and knowledge. After 30 years, many sections of the US package insert (PI) are outdated. Methods We comprehensively reviewed the literature to propose PI updates. We present the information in 2 articles. In Part I, we focus on basic pharmacology based on 407 relevant articles. Part II focuses on clinical aspects and pharmacovigilance. Findings/Results Based on more recent expectations of Food and Drug Administration regulations, we reviewed clozapine basic pharmacology including the following: 1) clearance, 2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and 3) monitoring tools. We identified 9 major problems in the basic pharmacological sections of the PI including the following: 1) in vivo studies indicate that clozapine is dependent on CYP1A2 for its metabolism, 2) the minor role of CYP2D6 in clozapine metabolism requires removing the PI recommendation to lower clozapine doses in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, 3) in nontoxic concentrations CYP3A4 has a minor role in clozapine metabolism and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors lack clinically relevant effects, 4) several drug-drug interactions need to be updated based on recent literature, 5) systemic inflammation may decrease clozapine metabolism and increase the risk of clozapine intoxication, 6) obesity may decrease clozapine metabolism, 7) patients of Asian and Indigenous American ancestry need lower clozapine doses, 8) personalized titration and c-reactive protein monitoring should be considered until prospective studies are available, and 9) the half-life section needs to be modified to acknowledge that single dosing at night is frequent in the US. Implications/Conclusions An improvement in the US clozapine PI may lead to improvement in PIs worldwide.

Abstract Purpose/Background This is the second part of a 2-part article that proposes improving the United States (US) clozapine package insert. Part II focuses on fatal outcomes and the 5 boxed warnings, 4 specifically for clozapine: severe neutropenia, seizure, orthostatic hypotension and myocarditis, and 1 for all antipsychotics (elderly with dementia). Methods US reports to the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database were analyzed from clozapine's introduction to January 15, 2023. Findings/Results The US was the top reporter worldwide for clozapine with 56,003 reports and 9587 associated fatal outcomes. The 4 clozapine boxed warnings were associated with 534 fatal outcomes (218 with severe neutropenia, 131 with seizures, 125 with orthostasis, 36 with myocarditis, 24 with cardiomyopathy, and 0 with mitral valve prolapse). With no boxed warnings, pneumonia was associated with 674 fatal outcomes and increased white blood cell count (a sign of infection) with 596 fatal outcomes. After considering overlaps, pneumonia and increases in white blood cell count explained 900 fatalities, or 9.4% of 9587 fatal outcomes. The Food and Drug Administration continues to focus on severe neutropenia which was associated with only 218 or 2.3% of fatal outcomes, whereas 97.7% of fatal outcomes reported in US clozapine-treated patients had another cause. Implications/Conclusions To help prevent future deaths in clozapine-treated patients, the clozapine package insert should focus on fatal outcomes during infections. Part II offers detailed solutions regarding current boxed warnings and lack of a warning for pneumonia and other infections. The Supplementary Material includes letters of support from 124 non-US clozapine experts from 44 countries/regions who support Parts I and II.

Abstract Purpose/Background Clozapine requires careful monitoring to minimize adverse reactions and optimize response. Because of variable pharmacokinetics and interpatient variability, guidelines recommend therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), although practical guidance is limited. This study aims to characterize patient factors associated with TDM, rates of TDM use over time, turnaround times of TDM results, and influence of institutional initiatives aimed to improve TDM. Methods/Procedures A retrospective chart review was conducted at a large 2000-bed academic medical center from August 1, 2015, to November 26, 2023. Adult patients who were administered clozapine during medical or psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations were included. Data collected included patient demographics, clozapine TDM ordering, and clozapine TDM turnaround time. Yearly TDM rates were analyzed to evaluate the impact of various institutional clozapine-related initiatives on TDM practices. Results There were 679 encounters involving 334 patients; 62.7 % were men, and 84.4% were White. Younger patients were less likely to have levels drawn (odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.97–0.99), while self-identified Asian patients more likely (odds ratio 7.54, confidence interval 1.60–35.42). TDM rates increased significantly over time for both medical ( P = 0.002) and psychiatric ( P < 0.001) admission types, with turnaround times improving from 66.07 hours in 2016 to 28.65 hours in 2022. Overall, TDM annual rates increased from 46.2% in 2015 to 69.6% in 2023. The time-period before and after an institutional initiative, which improved TDM turnaround time, was associated with improvements of TDM rates (36.2% vs 67.9%, P < 0.001) Conclusions This study highlights an increase in clozapine TDM use during the study period, but use remained suboptimal. Improvement of turnaround time was associated with increased TDM rates.