Schroeder, Darrell

Objectives: To identify patient characteristics, health concerns, and barriers to care based on overweight or obesity. Methods: A 50-question anonymous survey was administered to patients. Data were compared by body mass index (BMI). Results: Among 3976 distributed surveys, 899 were returned and 682 were analyzed. Most respondents were women (60%), White (94%), and married/partnered (65%) and had some college education (80%). Younger and unmarried persons had higher BMI ( P < .001). Concern for quality of life ( P < .001) and importance of lifestyle changes ( P = .006) increased with BMI, but confidence in making changes decreased as BMI increased ( P < .001). Perceived good health decreased with increasing BMI ( P < .001), whereas depression and other comorbid conditions increased. Self-esteem decreased and stigma increased with higher BMI (both P < .001). Weight discussions with clinicians ( P < .001) and belief that clinicians should be involved in weight management ( P = .002) increased with BMI, yet self-perception of being judged by clinicians also increased ( P < .001). As BMI increased, delays in seeking health care increased ( P < .001). Conclusions: This survey study highlights perceived health concerns and barriers to care among persons with overweight and obesity. With higher BMI, self-esteem decreased, and stigma, self-perception of poor health, perception of being judged by clinicians, and delay in seeking medical care increased.

People living with dementia have high rates of hospitalizations. Identifying factors that influence hospitalization is important. This study examines the influence of physical activity levels on risk of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) use among older people living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia followed in our primary care practice in Rochester, Minnesota, United States. We included those age 55 years and older, who had a clinic visit between June 1, 2019 and June 30, 2021 and completed a social determinants of health questionnaire about physical activity levels ( n = 3090). Physical activity was classified as sufficiently active, insufficiently active, or physically inactive. Risk of hospitalization and ED visits by physical activity levels were examined. People who were physically inactive were at higher risk of hospitalization and ED visits ( p < .001) compared with those who were sufficiently active. This highlights an area for health promotion in people living with MCI and dementia.

Abstract Background and Objectives Social isolation is commonly experienced by older people and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Little is known about the influence of social isolation on the risk of acute care utilization among people living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Our objective was to investigate the impact of social isolation on the risk of death, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) use among people living with MCI or dementia who are followed in our Community Internal Medicine practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Research Design and Methods We included people living with MCI or dementia, 55 years and older, who had a clinic visit between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, and who had completed questions about social connections. The risk of death, hospitalization, and ED use was examined by levels of social connection (socially isolated, moderately isolated, moderately integrated, or socially integrated). Results Of 2,320 people included (1,010 with MCI and 1,310 with dementia), 455 (19.6%) were classified as socially isolated and 591 (25.5%) were moderately isolated. Compared with those who were socially integrated, people who were socially isolated were at higher risk of death, hospitalization, and ED visits (p &lt; .001). Discussion and Implications Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of acute health care utilization and death in people living with MCI or dementia. Interventions to address social isolation in this population are needed.

Objectives Hospital-based behavioral emergency response teams (BERT) respond to acute behavioral disturbances among hospitalized patients. We aimed to examine associations between altered mental status in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and behavioral disturbances on surgical wards requiring BERT activation. Methods Electronic medical records of patients who underwent general anesthesia and were admitted to the PACU between May 2018–December 2020 were reviewed for episodes of BERT activations on surgical wards. Characteristics of BERT patients were compared with the rest of surgical population during the same period to examine risk factors for BERT. Results Of 56,275 adult surgical patients, 133 patients had 178 BERT activations (incidence 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0–2.8 per 1000 admissions), with 21 being for physical assault. The risk for BERT activation was increased with each decade over age of 50 as well as younger age (30 versus 50 y), male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.48, 95% CI 1.69, 3.62), longer procedures (OR = 1.08 per 30 minutes, 95% CI 1.05, 1.11), and alterations in mental status in PACU, with both moderate/deep sedation (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.04, 2.57) and agitation/combative state (OR = 8.47, 95% CI 5.13, 14.01), P < 0.001 for all comparisons. Conclusions Early postoperative agitation and oversedation are associated with BERT activation on surgical wards. Altered mental status in PACU should be conveyed to accepting hospital units so healthcare staff can be vigilant for the potential development of behavioral disturbances.

Within the Department of Medicine (DOM) in a large tertiary academic health care facility in midwestern United States, we have developed an educational offering that incorporates an academic writing program (AWP) blending the approaches of a writing accountability work group, a writing workshop, and didactic writing courses. The purpose of this AWP was to assist healthcare professionals (HCP) with their manuscript writing skills to enhance academic productivity. We report our evolving journey and experiences with this AWP. To date, it has been offered 3 times to 25 HCP over the course of 3 years. Among those responding to a post program follow up survey (N = 11), 8 (73%) indicated that they completed the project that they were working on during the AWP and went on to publish the manuscript (N = 5) or were in the process of submission (N = 2). Some indicated they has also gone on to present posters (N = 2) or were in the process of presenting posters (N = 2) or had received grants (N = 1) or were awaiting grant notice (N = 1). A number of attendees have continued to use and share the tools presented during the AWP. Based on input from attendees and increased requests for this AWP, this educational program has been deemed a success and expansion of this program is currently underway.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that deeper sedation in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) increases the risk of subsequent sedation in general care wards (ward sedation) and that patients with ward sedation have more postoperative adverse events than those without ward sedation. METHODS: We reviewed the health records of adult patients who underwent procedures with general anesthesia at Mayo Clinic from May 5, 2018, through December 31, 2020, and were discharged from the PACU to the general care ward. Patient groups were dichotomized as with ward sedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS], ≤–2) and without ward sedation (RASS, ≥–1) within the first 24 hours after PACU discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between clinical variables and ward sedation. RESULTS: A total of 23,766 patients were included in our analysis, of whom 1131 had ward sedation (incidence, 4.8 [Poisson 95% confidence interval, CI, 4.5–5.0]) per 100 patients after general anesthesia. Half of the ward sedation episodes occurred within 32 minutes after PACU discharge. The risk of ward sedation increased with the depth of PACU sedation. The odds ratios (95% CI) of ward sedation for patients with a PACU RASS score of –1 was 0.98 (0.75–1.27); –2, 1.87 (1.44–2.43); –3, 2.98 (2.26–3.93); and ≤–4, 3.97 (2.91–5.42). Adverse events requiring an emergency intervention occurred more often for patients with ward sedation (n = 92, 8.1%) than for those without ward sedation (n = 326, 1.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who met our criteria for PACU discharge, deeper sedation during anesthesia recovery was associated with an increased risk of ward sedation. Patients who had ward sedation had worse outcomes than those without ward sedation.

Background: In addition to the morbidity and mortality associated with acute infection, COVID-19 has been associated with persistent symptoms (>30 days), often referred to as Long COVID (LC). LC symptoms often cluster into phenotypes, resembling conditions such as fibromyalgia, postural orthostatic tachycardiac syndrome (POTS), and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). LC clinics have been established to best address the needs of LC patients and continuity of care. We developed a cross-sectional survey to assess treatment response through our LC Clinic (LCC). Methods: A 25-question survey (1-10 Likert scale) was expert- and content-validated by LCC clinicians, patients, and patient advocates. The survey assessed LC symptoms and the helpfulness of different interventions, including medications and supplements. A total of 852 LCC patients were asked to complete the survey, with 536 (62.9%) responding. Results: The mean time from associated COVID-19 infection to survey completion was 23.2 ± 6.4 months. The mean age of responders was 52.3 ± 14.1 (63% females). Self-reported symptoms were all significantly improved ( P < .001) from the initial visit to the LCC (baseline) to the time of the follow-up survey. However, only 4.5% (24/536) of patients rated all symptoms low (1-2) at the time of the survey, indicating low levels of full recovery in our cohort. The patients rated numerous interventions as being helpful, including low-dose naltrexone (45/77; 58%), vagal nerve stimulation (18/34; 53%), and fisetin (28/44; 64%). Conclusions: Patients report general improvements in symptoms following the initial LCC visit, but complete recovery rates remain low at 23.2 ± 6.4 months.

Abstract Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is frequent after bariatric surgery. We hypothesized that when compared with a volatile-based technique incorporating propofol infusions, the need for rescue antiemetics would be reduced by the use of two strategies: 1) the addition of dexmedetomidine infusions, and 2) the avoidance of opioid and volatile anesthetics, and that this reduction would be observed in the PACU following PACU discharge. Methods In this retrospective observational study we included patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2018–2022 who received one of three anesthetic strategies: 1) volatile anesthetic and propofol infusion (VOL + PROP), 2) VOL + PROP with the addition of dexmedetomidine (DEX), or 3) opioid-sparing total intravenous anesthesia (PROP + DEX). Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis determined the association between the need for rescue-antiemetics in the PACU following PACU discharge. Results 332 patients received VOL + PROP, 354 VOL + PROP + DEX, and 166 PROP + DEX. PROP + DEX received fewer rescue antiemetics in PACU compared to VOL + PROP (11% vs 24%, P = 0.002), and VOL + PROP + DEX fewer compared to VOL + PROP (16% vs 24%, P = 0.023). This differential effect was limited to PACU stay; antiemetic use increased across all groups following PACU discharge until midnight (ranging from 38–46% across groups, P = 0.71) and through the first postoperative day (ranging from 47–57%, P = 0.20). Conclusions The benefit associated with two PONV prevention strategies, the addition of dexmedetomidine infusion or avoidance of opioid and volatile anesthetics, did not persist after PACU discharge. These findings highlight the challenge of PONV on postoperative wards, and the need for a novel multimodal team approach to mitigate this complication.

Background: Breastfeeding has numerous health benefits for patients and their infants. There are inconsistencies in how anesthesia providers care for lactating patients undergoing anesthesia. Providers may be cautious and have patients “pump and dump” instead of following current evidence-based recommendations. Video-based education provides a novel reference for health care providers in their fast-paced work environments. This project evaluated the effectiveness of an online video module and resources accessed at the bedside for anesthesia providers caring for lactating patients. Materials and Methods: A preintervention survey was sent to anesthesia providers at a large academic institution to assess baseline knowledge of current recommendations for caring for lactating patients having anesthesia. A quick response code-linked video module and references were created and disseminated to all anesthesia providers. A postsurvey was sent to assess knowledge and satisfaction with the educational approach. Postsurvey data were compared with presurvey data. Results: All who watched the educational video found the education helpful to care for lactating patients undergoing surgery. In the posteducation group, 93% of providers selected the correct recommendation to continue breastfeeding or pumping after general anesthesia or sedation once the patient is awake and alert, compared with 48% in the pre-education group. After education, 92% would recommend preoperative feeding or pumping prior to transport to the operating room, compared with the 50% in the pre-education group. Conclusions: Video-based, just-in-time education is an effective way to deliver updated information to anesthesia providers. This format is conducive to just-in-time delivery, and there may be implications for other patient populations that present infrequently but require population-specific care.