Schroeder, Darrel R

Within the Department of Medicine (DOM) in a large tertiary academic health care facility in midwestern United States, we have developed an educational offering that incorporates an academic writing program (AWP) blending the approaches of a writing accountability work group, a writing workshop, and didactic writing courses. The purpose of this AWP was to assist healthcare professionals (HCP) with their manuscript writing skills to enhance academic productivity. We report our evolving journey and experiences with this AWP. To date, it has been offered 3 times to 25 HCP over the course of 3 years. Among those responding to a post program follow up survey (N = 11), 8 (73%) indicated that they completed the project that they were working on during the AWP and went on to publish the manuscript (N = 5) or were in the process of submission (N = 2). Some indicated they has also gone on to present posters (N = 2) or were in the process of presenting posters (N = 2) or had received grants (N = 1) or were awaiting grant notice (N = 1). A number of attendees have continued to use and share the tools presented during the AWP. Based on input from attendees and increased requests for this AWP, this educational program has been deemed a success and expansion of this program is currently underway.

Background: Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade is reversed with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate or sugammadex. Anticholinergic glycopyrrolate decreases bladder detrusor muscle contractility, potentially leading to postoperative urinary retention (POUR). POUR commonly complicates inguinal herniorrhaphy. In this study we assess association between reversal technique and POUR. Methods: Records of adult patients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with neuromuscular blockade from January 2013 to September 2020 were reviewed for POUR (unplanned postoperative insertion of urinary catheter). A propensity-adjusted analysis was performed to assess POUR in neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for potential confounding. Results: We identified 181 patients who underwent herniorrhaphy with amnio-steroidal neuromuscular blockers, 75 (41.4%) who received sugammadex and 106 (58.6%) neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. Compared with sugammadex, neostigmine/glycopyrrolate group had longer surgical course [unweighted standardized difference (USTD)=0.38, P=0.004], received more intraoperative opioids (USTD=0.704, P<0.001), more often performed via laparoscopic approach (USTD=0.407, P=0.012), and less often with periprocedural urinary catheter insertion (USTD=0.452, P=0.003). POUR was observed in 2 (3%) of patients in the sugammadex group, and 16 (15%) in neostigmine/glycopyrrolate [unadjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.69; P=0.015, and IPTW OR=0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.64; P=0.012]. Results remained similar with further analysis adjusted for opioid administration in the postanesthesia care unit (adjusted IPTW OR=0.18; 95% CI: 0.04-0.88; P=0.034). Of the POUR patients, 9 required unplanned overnight admission and 4 emergency room visit. Conclusion: These results suggest that neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex is associated with lower rates of POUR following unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Our results need to be reconfirmed in a randomized prospective study.