Joyner, Michael J

AbstractThe present study investigated the impact of central α2‐adrenergic mechanisms on sympathetic action potential (AP) discharge, recruitment and latency strategies. We used the microneurographic technique to record muscle sympathetic nerve activity and a continuous wavelet transform to investigate postganglionic sympathetic AP firing during a baseline condition and an infusion of a α2‐adrenergic receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine (10 min loading infusion of 0.225 µg kg−1; maintenance infusion of 0.1–0.5 µg kg h−1) in eight healthy individuals (28 ± 7 years, five females). Dexmedetomidine reduced mean pressure (92 ± 7 to 80 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001) but did not alter heart rate (61 ± 13 to 60 ± 14 bpm; P = 0.748). Dexmedetomidine reduced sympathetic AP discharge (126 ± 73 to 27 ± 24 AP 100 beats−1, P = 0.003) most strongly for medium‐sized APs (normalized cluster 2: 21 ± 10 to 5 ± 5 AP 100 beats−1; P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine progressively de‐recruited sympathetic APs beginning with the largest AP clusters (12 ± 3 to 7 ± 2 clusters, P = 0.002). Despite de‐recruiting large AP clusters with shorter latencies, dexmedetomidine reduced AP latency across remaining clusters (1.18 ± 0.12 to 1.13 ± 0.13 s, P = 0.002). A subset of six participants performed a Valsalva manoeuvre (20 s, 40 mmHg) during baseline and the dexmedetomidine infusion. Compared to baseline, AP discharge (Δ 361 ± 292 to Δ 113 ± 155 AP 100 beats−1, P = 0.011) and AP cluster recruitment elicited by the Valsalva manoeuvre were lower during dexmedetomidine (Δ 2 ± 1 to Δ 0 ± 2 AP clusters, P = 0.041). The reduction in sympathetic AP latency elicited by the Valsalva manoeuvre was not affected by dexmedetomidine (Δ –0.09 ± 0.07 to Δ –0.07 ± 0.14 s, P = 0.606). Dexmedetomidine reduced baroreflex gain, most strongly for medium‐sized APs (normalized cluster 2: –6.0 ± 5 to –1.6 ± 2 % mmHg−1; P = 0.008). These data suggest that α2‐adrenergic mechanisms within the central nervous system modulate sympathetic postganglionic neuronal discharge, recruitment and latency strategies in humans. imageKey points Sympathetic postganglionic neuronal subpopulations innervating the human circulation exhibit complex patterns of discharge, recruitment and latency. However, the central neural mechanisms governing sympathetic postganglionic discharge remain unclear. This microneurographic study investigated the impact of a dexmedetomidine infusion (α2‐adrenergic receptor agonist) on muscle sympathetic postganglionic action potential (AP) discharge, recruitment and latency patterns. Dexmedetomidine infusion inhibited the recruitment of large and fast conducting sympathetic APs and attenuated the discharge of medium sized sympathetic APs that fired during resting conditions and the Valsalva manoeuvre. Dexmedetomidine infusion elicited shorter sympathetic AP latencies during resting conditions but did not affect the reductions in latency that occurred during the Valsalva manoeuvre. These data suggest that α2‐adrenergic mechanisms within the central nervous system modulate sympathetic postganglionic neuronal discharge, recruitment and latency strategies in humans.

World record speeds at different distances for men and women in different age categories are used to develop a model to predict running performance as a function of race distance, age, and sex. This empirical model quantifies the decline in running speed with distance and age in a way that provides insight into the aerobic and anaerobic contributions to running speed and may help with developing training strategies for different age groups at various distances.

Purpose: While it is well-known that elite males are faster than elite females in all Olympic-length swimming events, less is known about the age of the divergence in swimming performance between the sexes. Thus, this observational study compared swimming performance of elite male and female youths. Methods: We collected the all-time best 100 U.S. freestyle swimming performance times of boys and girls aged 5 to 18 years for six freestyle swimming events from 50m to 1500m. We compared data using univariate ANOVAs and Chi-squared tests. Results: Swimming performance improved with increasing age for both boys and girls (p<0.001) until a plateau— which began at a younger age for girls (15 years) than boys (17 years; sex × age; p<0.001). Before age 8, there was no sex difference in swimming performance (p>0.05). Beginning at age 9 however, boys swimming performance was faster than girls (1.0% to 1.3% depending on distance), and this sex difference in performance increased in magnitude until 18 years (p<0.001; 6.6% to 11.0% depending on distance). While boys represent 50% of the top 100 age-group performances at ages 5 and 6, boys represent an increasingly larger proportion of top performances across years of age including nearly 100% of all top 100 age-group performances beginning at age 15—except for one notable female swimmer in the 1500m Conclusion: Among elite youth swimmers, boys have increasingly faster performances than girls beginning at age 9 years, with minimal sex differences in swimming performance before 9 years. Additionally, boys represent an increasingly larger proportion of the top 100 age-group performances of all-time. No funding. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

AbstractInfluenzavirus is among the most relevant candidates for a next pandemic. We review here the phylogeny of former influenza pandemics, and discuss candidate lineages. After briefly reviewing the other existing antiviral options, we discuss in detail the evidences supporting the efficacy of passive immunotherapies against influenzavirus, with a focus on convalescent plasma.

ABSTRACT Although severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and hospitalization associated with COVID-19 are generally preventable among healthy vaccine recipients, patients with immunosuppression have poor immunogenic responses to COVID-19 vaccines and remain at high risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalization. In addition, monoclonal antibody therapy is limited by the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants that have serially escaped neutralization. In this context, there is interest in understanding the clinical benefit associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma collected from persons who have been both naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (“vax-plasma”). Thus, we report the clinical outcome of 386 immunocompromised outpatients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and who received contemporary COVID-19-specific therapeutics (standard-of-care group) and a subgroup who also received concomitant treatment with very high titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma (vax-plasma group) with a specific focus on hospitalization rates. The overall hospitalization rate was 2.2% (5 of 225 patients) in the vax-plasma group and 6.2% (10 of 161 patients) in the standard-of-care group, which corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 65% ( P = 0.046). Evidence of efficacy in nonvaccinated patients cannot be inferred from these data because 94% (361 of 386 patients) of patients were vaccinated. In vaccinated patients with immunosuppression and COVID-19, the addition of vax-plasma or very high titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma to COVID-19-specific therapies reduced the risk of disease progression leading to hospitalization. IMPORTANCE As SARS-CoV-2 evolves, new variants of concern (VOCs) have emerged that evade available anti-spike monoclonal antibodies, particularly among immunosuppressed patients. However, high-titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma continues to be effective against VOCs because of its broad-spectrum immunomodulatory properties. Thus, we report clinical outcomes of 386 immunocompromised outpatients who were treated with COVID-19-specific therapeutics and a subgroup also treated with vaccine-boosted convalescent plasma. We found that the administration of vaccine-boosted convalescent plasma was associated with a significantly decreased incidence of hospitalization among immunocompromised COVID-19 outpatients. Our data add to the contemporary data providing evidence to support the clinical utility of high-titer convalescent plasma as antibody replacement therapy in immunocompromised patients.

Plasma collected from people recovered from COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma, CCP) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the pandemic. CCP was, however, often employed in combination with other drugs, such as the antiviral remdesivir and glucocorticoids. The possible effect of such interaction has never been investigated systematically. To assess the safety and efficacy of CCP combined with other agents for treatment of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, a systematic literature search using appropriate Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central, medRxiv and bioRxiv. The main outcomes considered were mortality and safety of CCP combined with other treatments versus CCP alone. This review was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Measure of treatment effect was the risk ratio (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 11 studies (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 3 observational) were included in the systematic review, 4 studies with CCP combined with remdesivir and 6 studies with CCP combined with corticosteroids, all involving hospitalized patients. One RCT reported information on both remdesivir and steroids use with CCP. The use of CCP combined with remdesivir was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56–0.97; p = 0.03; moderate certainty of evidence), while the use of steroids with CCP did not modify the mortality risk (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.34–1.51; p = 0.38; very low certainty of evidence). Not enough safety data were retrieved form the systematic literature analysis. The current evidence from the literature suggests a potential beneficial effect on mortality of combined CCP plus remdesivir compared to CCP alone in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. No significant clinical interaction was found between CCP and steroids.

This case report indicates that a recreationally trained 58-year-old man can reach similar or even higher values of energy expenditure (∼4 times their basal metabolic rate) than professional cyclists, who are likely near the ceiling of sustained energy expenditure for humans. This was possible owing to a total longer exercise time coupled with a lower absolute and relative intensity in the recreational athlete.