Boland, Jennifer M.

While lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies routinely encountered by pathologists, benign pulmonary neoplasms are quite rare. However, it is important for pathologists to be familiar with the typical diagnostic features of benign lung tumors to avoid confusing them with malignant morphological mimics. There have also been intriguing discoveries in the genetics of benign pulmonary neoplasms in the past decade. This review will cover several of the most common benign lung tumors, including the diagnostic categories of pulmonary adenomas, bronchial papillomas, and benign mesenchymal tumors, with discussion of the current classification, differential diagnosis, and current knowledge regarding genetic drivers.

Abstract Objectives Bronchiolar adenoma/ciliated muconodular papillary tumor (BA/CMPT) and sclerosing pneumocytoma (SP) are both rare and morphologically unique peripheral lung tumors with indolent behavior. These tumors have not been previously described as showing overlapping morphologic features and are generally genetically distinct. Methods Two cases were recently encountered that show hybrid morphologic features between BA/CMPT and SP, and the morphology and immunophenotype are described in detail. Results Both cases showed interstitial round cells typical of SP (TTF1+, EMA+), as well as areas more typical of BA/CMPT. One case showed BRAFV600E expression in the BA/CMPT areas but not in the SP-like cells. Conclusions Although it is possible that these cases represent collision tumors or are examples of unusual metaplastic epithelial changes in SP, they also raise the possibility that these 2 entities could occasionally coexist in true hybrid tumors.

Context.— Progressive independence in medicine is critical to building confidence and decisiveness in trainees. However, this can be difficult to accomplish in the strict regulatory environment of pathology. Objective.— To pilot and adopt a process whereby surgical pathology fellows independently manage a subset of cases and release preliminary reports. Design.— Upon program approval, board-certified surgical pathology fellows were eligible for preliminary report sign-out at their discretion. Eligible cases were sent from outside institutions for confirmatory review. Preliminary reports were viewable in the electronic medical record. Safety measures were used to ensure timely release of final reports by attending pathologists. Results.— Fellows participating in the pilot (n = 4) released 59 preliminary reports out of 101 cases reviewed (58%), with 1 potentially significant discrepancy between preliminary and final report. Turnaround time was not affected. The process was endorsed by all participants and adopted as standard practice. During the first year, eligible fellows (n = 8) released 123 preliminary reports out of 1260 cases reviewed (9.8%). There were no major diagnostic discrepancies and no effects on turnaround time. The number of preliminary reports released by each fellow was variable (range, 2–48; median, 8), likely a reflection of both external factors (number of trainees on service, volume) and trainee-specific factors (confidence, efficiency). Conclusions.— Fellows showed good judgment when independently managing cases, with just 1 potentially significant discrepancy out of 182 cases (<1%). No patients were adversely impacted. Use of this process varied widely among fellows and may require closer monitoring and encouragement for fellows who are tentative about releasing preliminary reports.

Patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma have a high risk of recurrent or metastatic disease despite undergoing curative intent therapy. We hypothesized that increased CD14+ cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) could stratify patient outcomes. Immunohistochemistry for CD14 was performed on 189 specimens from patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent curative intent surgery. Outcomes and associations with clinical and pathologic variables were determined. In vitro studies utilized a coculture system to model the lung cancer TME containing CD14+ cells. Patients with high levels of TME CD14+ cells experienced a median overall survival of 5.5 years compared with 8.3 and 10.7 years for those with moderate or low CD14 levels, respectively (p < 0.001). Increased CD14+ cell tumor infiltration was associated with a higher stage at diagnosis and more positive lymph nodes at the time of surgery. This prognostic capacity remained even for patients with early-stage disease. Using an in vitro model system, we found that CD14+ cells reduced chemotherapy-induced cancer cell death. These data suggest that CD14+ cells are a biomarker for poor prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma and may promote tumor survival. CD14+ cell integration into the lung cancer TME can occur early in the disease and may be a promising new therapeutic avenue.

Context.— Studies of lungs in patients with COVID-19 have focused on early findings. Objective.— To systematically study histopathologic and imaging features and presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in lung tissue from patients in later stages of COVID-19. Design.— Autopsies, explants, surgical lung biopsies, transbronchial biopsies, cryobiopsies, and needle biopsies from patients with COVID-19 whose onset of symptoms/confirmed diagnosis was more than 28 days before the procedure were studied. Available images were reviewed. Reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 RNA was performed on lung tissue. Results.— Of 44 specimens (43 patients; median age, 59.3 years; 26 [60.5%] male) features of acute lung injury (ALI) were seen in 39 (88.6%), predominantly organizing pneumonia and diffuse alveolar damage, up to 298 days after onset of COVID-19. Fibrotic changes were found in 33 specimens (75%), most commonly fibrotic diffuse alveolar damage (n = 22) and cicatricial organizing pneumonia (n = 12). Time between acquiring COVID-19 and specimen was shorter in patients with diffuse ALI (median, 61.5 days) compared with patients with focal (140 days) or no ALI (130 days) (P = .009). Sixteen (of 20; 80%) SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction tests were positive, up to 174 days after COVID-19 onset. Time between COVID-19 onset and most recent computed tomography in patients with consolidation on imaging was shorter (median, 43.0 days) versus in patients without consolidation (87.5 days; P = .02). Reticulations were associated with longer time to computed tomography after COVID-19 onset (median, 82 versus 23.5 days; P = .006). Conclusions.— ALI and SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected in patients with COVID-19 for many months. ALI may evolve into fibrotic interstitial lung disease.

Abstract Objectives Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial processes can be quite challenging. Ancillary tests such as BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) immunohistochemistry and p16 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are helpful tools to aid in this distinction. Immunohistochemistry for methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) has recently been proposed as an effective surrogate marker for p16 FISH and is an attractive alternative test due to shorter turnaround time. There are little data regarding the specificity of MTAP loss for mesothelioma or whether it may be useful to distinguish mesothelioma from the most common entity in the differential diagnosis, sarcomatoid carcinoma. Methods We studied well-characterized cases of sarcomatoid carcinoma (n = 34) and sarcomatoid mesothelioma (n = 62), which were stained for MTAP (clone 2G4) and BAP1 (clone C-4). Results Loss of MTAP expression was observed in 17 (50%) of 34 pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas; BAP1 expression was retained in all of the cases in which it was performed (n = 31). MTAP expression was lost in 38 (61%) of 62 sarcomatoid mesotheliomas; BAP1 was lost in 6 (10%) of 62. In the six cases with BAP1 loss, five also had loss of MTAP, while MTAP expression was retained in one. Conclusions Loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry is common in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, as it is present in half of cases. This rate is similar to what is observed in sarcomatoid mesothelioma (61%). Therefore, this stain is not useful to distinguish between these two malignancies. MTAP loss is more common than BAP1 loss in the setting of sarcomatoid mesothelioma (61% vs 10%, respectively).

Abstract Objectives To evaluate SATB2 expression and prognostic implications in a large cohort of thoracic neuroendocrine tumors. Methods Surgical pathology files (1995-2017) and an institutional thymic epithelial tumor database (2010-2020) were searched for resected neuroendocrine tumors. Cases were stained with SATB2 (clone EP281). Percent SATB2-positive tumor cells and expression intensity were scored. Results In the lung, SATB2 was expressed in 5% or more of tumor cells in 29 (74.4%) of 39 small cell carcinomas and 9 (22.5%) of 40 atypical and 26 (40.6%) of 64 typical carcinoid tumors. SATB2 percent tumor cell expression and intensity were higher in small cell carcinomas than in carcinoid tumors (both P &lt; .001, respectively). After adjusting for tumor subtype, SATB2 expression did not correlate with outcome. In the thymus, four (100%) of four atypical carcinoid tumors and one large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma but no small cell carcinoma (n = 2) expressed SATB2 in 5% or more of tumor cells. Conclusions SATB2 (clone EP281) is expressed in a large subset of pulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine tumors and therefore does not appear to be a useful marker to identify the origin of neuroendocrine tumors. Validation studies are needed, specifically including thymic neuroendocrine tumors, as the expression pattern might be different in those tumors.

Abstract Background The prevalence of multiple primary lung cancers is rising, highlighting the need for tools to distinguish independent primary tumors from metastases. Molecular markers and hisopathologic comparison are useful to aid in this distinction, but they have significant limitations. Case Presentation A 76-year old woman presented with recurrent bronchorrhea, non-productive cough, and dyspnea upon exertion. She was a former smoker (15 pack-year history). Computerized tomography imaging revealed multiple lung masses: 1.9 × 2.3 cm nodule in the right upper lobe, and a 6.5 cm mass in the right lower lobe. Histologic examination of the tumors showed that the right lower lobe mass was an adenosquamous carcinoma with a mucinous adenocarcinoma component. This tumor showed visceral pleural invasion, and direct invasion of one intrapulmonary peribronchial lymph node. The upper lobe lesion was characterized by pure invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma with no squamous component. Abdominal and pelvic imaging was performed to rule out alternative primary sites, and no evidence of disease was identified outside of the chest. A cancer mutation and rearrangement panel on the adenosquamous carcinoma did not reveal any mutations. Conclusions In this interesting case, a patient presented with two lung tumors which had some morphologic similarities, but also some important differences, and no specific genetic mutations were present to establish the relationship between the tumors. Although current tools are useful, this case highlights an example of a case where it remains extremely difficult to determine whether two lung cancers are independent primary tumors or intrapulmonary metastases.

There are limited data regarding the surgical management of primary pulmonary artery sarcomas (PPAS) because of their rarity and complicated diagnostic history. The objective of this study was to analyze our institution’s long-term surgical management outcomes for PPAS in the absence of a care pathway. From May 1997 to June 2013, 8 patients (mean age 60.6 ± 11.8 years; range, 40-73 years; 5 women and 3 men) underwent surgical intervention for PPAS at our institution. The most common computed tomography finding was a luminal filling defect obstructing the pulmonary artery (PA), without evidence of extraluminal extension. Three patients underwent debulking/pulmonary endarterectomy alone and 5 patients underwent a more radical resection with PA patch angioplasty, PA resection and reconstruction, pulmonary valve replacement, and unilateral pneumonectomy. The mean postoperative survival in this series was 3.8 ± 3.6 years (range, 1-11.9 years), with 2 radical surgical resection patients alive at 4.9 and 11.9 years, respectively. For those patients with incomplete resection, 3-dimensional (3D) models were created to demonstrate the advantage of a preoperative guide for a more complete resection and what it would entail. Six patients had local recurrences with mean disease-free interval of 14 ± 10.9 months (range, 2 months-2.5 years), and 2 patients with re-resections had an overall postoperative survival of 2.8 and 11.9 years, respectively. In our small cohort of PPAS, patients treated with radical surgical resection had better survival. The small number of PPAS cases in this series makes proving this association unlikely but warrants consideration.