Wolfe, Stanley

Background Transplantation using hearts obtained through donation after circulatory death (DCD) is increasing, but data on recipient renal outcomes are limited. Methods and Results Patients at a single institution who underwent heart transplantation using organs procured through DCD or donation after brain death (DBD) from April 2016 to August 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Hemodynamic measures were collected via right heart catheterization performed 1 week after transplantation. Posttransplantation renal outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 16 weeks, and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy within 1 week. The analysis included 225 patients (55 recipients of DCD). Baseline characteristics were comparable between recipients of DCD and DBD. Renal outcomes within 1 week posttransplantation in recipients of DCD were similar to recipients of DBD, including percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (−37.9% [−58.6 to −6.2] versus −31.9% [−52.4 to −9.9]; P =0.91), incidence of AKI (47.3% versus 46.5%; P >0.99) and incidence of renal replacement therapy (3.6% versus 4.7%; P >0.99). Recipients of DCD with AKI within 1 week (“early AKI”) did not recover to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (75.8 [60.2–91.3] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) by week 16 (59.3 [46.9–73.6] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; P =0.002), whereas recipients without early AKI exhibited comparable estimated glomerular filtration rate to baseline by week 4 (84.5 [70.8–98.5] mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; P =0.084). Similar trends were observed in recipients of DBD. Conclusions Recipients of DCD demonstrated similar renal outcomes compared with recipients of DBD, supporting the ongoing use of DCD transplantation. Early AKI was associated with persistent renal dysfunction for recipients of both DCD and DBD.

AbstractObjectivesWe provide a contemporary consideration of long‐term outcomes and trends of induction therapy use following lung transplantation in the United States. Methods: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry from 2006 to 2018 for first‐time, adult, lung‐only transplant recipients. Long‐term survival was compared between induction classes (Interleukin‐2 inhibitors, monoclonal or polyclonal cell‐depleting agents, and no induction therapy). A 1:1 propensity score match was performed, pairing patients who received basiliximab with similar risk recipients who did not receive induction therapy. Outcomes in matched populations were compared using Cox, Kaplan‐Meier and Logistic regression modeling.Measurements and main results22 025 recipients were identified; 8003 (36.34%) were treated with no induction therapy, 11 045 (50.15%) with basiliximab, 1556 (7.06%) with alemtuzumab and 1421 (6.45%) with anti‐thymocyte globulin. Compared with those who received no induction, patients receiving basiliximab, alemtuzumab or anti‐thymocyte globulin were found on multivariable Cox‐regression analyses to have lower long‐term mortality (all p < .05). Following propensity score matching of basiliximab and no induction populations, analyses demonstrated a statistically significant association between basiliximab use and long‐ term survival (p < .001). Basiliximab was also associated with a lower risk of acute rejection (p < .001) and renal failure (p = .002).ConclusionInduction therapy for lung transplant recipients—specifically basiliximab—is associated with improved long‐term survival and a lower risk of renal failure or acute rejection.