Sharma, Samin K.

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) can be managed by ischemia guide strategies or early invasive strategies. Here, we present the findings of an updated contemporary analysis regarding the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI)-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI and in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI in the United States using the NIS database from 2016 to 2021. ICI use increased by nearly threefold between 2016 and 2021, without a significant difference in in-hospital mortality, though interestingly, mortality rates compared with angiography guidance were similar and relatively low. In this study, the use of ICI was associated with lower adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest, but with a longer length of stay and cost of hospitalization.

Myocardial Bridging (MB) is typically a benign congenital coronary anomaly. MB can infrequently result in complications such as myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Recent studies suggest an underlying genetic component for MB involving DES, FBN1, SCN2B, or NOTCH1. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in managing MB, compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT), remains uncertain. Our study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database to identify patients aged 18 or older with myocardial bridging who were managed with PCI versus medical therapy. We compared the outcomes between both groups including in-hospital mortality, the trend of management of MB and other in-hospital outcomes or complications. Our results showed no statistically significant difference between both subgroups when comparing in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes of cardiac arrest and the development of an acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients with myocardial bridging treated with PCI had a higher risk of developing cardiogenic shock, requiring LVAD, and requiring the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) compared to the medical therapy subgroup. Our study suggests the decision to perform PCI in myocardial bridging patients should be individualized such as in patients with refractory symptoms despite medical therapy or those with known high-risk features.

Introduction: Data on outcomes between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes remain inconclusive. We aimed to systematically analyze PCI outcomes by comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Methods: We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception in 1966 through January 2024 for studies evaluating PCI outcomes comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Two investigators independently reviewed the data. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used. Results: A total of 10 prospective trials were identified that enrolled 42,253 individuals who presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Our analysis found that heparin when compared to bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of trial-based definition of major bleeding [relative risk (RR): 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29–2.20], nonaccess site complications (RR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.75–12.09), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.20–2.41), major bleeding risks (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.49–2.36), cardiovascular disease death (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02–1.57), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.07–2.62). There were no statistically significant differences between heparin and bivalirudin for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event, stroke, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and acute or stent thrombosis. Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrates bivalirudin reduces major bleeding when used for anticoagulation during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes and is not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiovascular event.

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe role of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is still unclear in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI in the current second‐generation DES era.AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the trends and outcomes of IVUS‐guided PCI in patients with STEMI.MethodsWe used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021. The primary endpoint of this study is all‐cause in‐hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints include trends of PCI hospitalizations, trends of mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization.ResultsThere were data for 819,645 hospitalizations for STEMI, of which 91.2% (n = 74,7860) utilized angiography‐guided PCI, 8.4% (n = 68,985) utilized IVUS‐guided PCI and 0.3% (n = 2800) utilized OCT‐guided PCI. In‐hospital mortality for IVUS‐guided PCI was 4.6% (n = 3190) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography‐guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.75 (0.68–0.81, p < 0.001). In‐hospital mortality for OCT‐guided PCI was 3.4% (n = 95) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography‐guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.67 (0.43–1.06, p = 0.09).ConclusionsIVUS/OCT‐guidance was increasingly utilized over the years and was associated with a significantly reduced adjusted odds of in‐hospital mortality. Large‐scale, long‐term randomized data are needed to better ascertain where IVUS/OCT may be best utilized for optimization of PCI for STEMI.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare and often underdiagnosed cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), predominantly affecting younger women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The management of SCAD remains a subject of debate, likely secondary to inconclusive evidence. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of SCAD patients treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a national population-based cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. The study included patients identified with SCAD using the ICD-10-CM (the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification) code I25.42. We excluded individuals who did not receive PCI or coronary angiography, those who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and patients with incomplete records. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, cost of hospitalization, and length of stay. National estimates were obtained using discharge weights, and statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square tests and linear regression. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of mortality and other outcomes. Results: A total of 31,105 SCAD patients were included in the study, with 10,480 receiving OMT and 20,625 undergoing PCI. Patients in the PCI group were older (mean age 64 vs. 54 years) and had higher comorbidities compared to those in the OMT group. The proportion of SCAD patients receiving PCI declined from 72% in 2016 to 60% in 2020. In multivariable analysis, PCI was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–2.90, p = 0.0003), cardiogenic shock (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.71–3.07, p < 0.0001), use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (OR 3.97, 95% CI 2.42–6.53, p < 0.0001), and an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.63–3.09, p < 0.0001). Trends also suggested an association between PCI and cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and acute kidney injury (AKI). The PCI group had significantly higher hospitalization costs and longer lengths of stay compared to the OMT group (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this large, national cohort study, SCAD patients who underwent PCI had significantly higher risks of adverse in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, compared to those treated with OMT. These findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection and the potential advantages of conservative management in SCAD, particularly in patients without severe or unstable presentations. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for the optimal management of SCAD.

It is well known that individuals with liver cirrhosis are considered at high risk for cardiac surgery, with an increased risk for morbidity and mortality as the liver disease progresses. In the last decade, there have been considerable advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in individuals deemed to be at high risk for surgery. However, research surrounding TAVI in the setting of liver cirrhosis has not been as widely studied. In this national population-based cohort study, we evaluated the trends of mortality, complications, and healthcare utilization in liver cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI, as well as analyzed the basic demographics of these individuals. We found that from 2011 to 2020, the amount of TAVI procedures conducted in cirrhotic patients was increasing annually, while mortality, procedural complications, and healthcare utilization trends in these cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI decreased. Overall, TAVI does seem to be reasonable management for aortic stenosis patients with liver cirrhosis who need aortic valve replacement.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can be treated conservatively. However, some SCAD patients can develop cardiogenic shock (CS). We evaluated the outcomes of SCAD-related CS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2019. In our study of 32,640 patients with SCAD, about 10.6% of patients presented with CS. We found that SCAD patients with CS had higher mortality and greater complications including use of mechanical circulatory devices, arrhythmias, respiratory support, and acute heart failure compared to those without CS. When comparing CS due to SCAD with that due to coronary artery disease, we found that although mortality rates were similar, those with CS due to SCAD were associated with higher risk of use of mechanical circulatory support, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and respiratory failure.

Abstract Aims Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has become increasingly recognized. It accounts for &lt;1-4% of acute coronary syndrome presentations. Overall, however, it makes up over 40% of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. Furthermore, pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is described to have a greater degree of clinical manifestations, including left ventricular dysfunction, shock, and left main or multivessel involvement. The findings are disconcerting, though many studies evaluating P-SCAD are based on case series data or are single centre studies. Methods and results The aim of this study was to evaluate a larger national dataset to evaluate the outcomes of SCAD and specifically P-SCAD in an attempt to better characterize the severity and clinical nature of this condition. To conduct this study, we analysed the National Readmission Database from January 2016 to December 2020. Propensity matching was done using the Greedy 1:1 method. Multivariate logistics and time-to-event Cox regression analysis models were built by including all confounders significantly associated with the outcome on univariable analysis with a cut-off P-value of 0.2. In multivariate regression analysis, P-SCAD patients had a non-propensity matched odds ratio (OR) of 0.21 (0.3-1.54, P = 0.123) of dying and a propensity matched OR of 0.11 (0.02-0.61, P = 0.012) of dying. Thirty-day readmission rate for P-SCAD was 15.8% (n = 93) and for non-pregnant spontaneous coronary artery dissection (NP-SCAD) was 11.2% (n = 2286); non-propensity matched OR for readmission for PSCAD patients was 1.68 (1.24-2.29, P = 0.001) and propensity matched OR was 3.39 (1.93-5.97, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patient, P–SCAD was associated with similar clinical outcomes and reduced incidence of death when compared with NP–SCAD, though had higher rates of 30–day readmission. Larger–scale observational data will be needed to ascertain the true incidence of cardiovascular complications as it relates to P–SCAD.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is defined as a non-traumatic separation of the epicardial coronary artery walls that creates a false lumen. SCAD poses a difficult challenge in management, as decisions regarding revascularization and medical management seem to be tailored to the individual patient. We evaluated and compared outcomes based on cardiogenic shock in patients with SCAD utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020. Methods: We utilized the NRD 2016–2019 to carry out this study. We evaluated demographics (e.g., age, gender), conventional risk factors, comorbidities present on the index admission, and in-hospital outcomes using their specific ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcomes were In-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications in SCAD patient with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to those without CS. Results: We analyzed 2473 individuals with SCAD, 2199 of these individuals did not have cardiogenic shock whereas 274 of these individuals did have cardiogenic shock. When comparing SCAD with cardiogenic shock to SCAD without cardiogenic shock, there was a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR) for death (propensity matched OR 24.93 (7.49–83.05), use of mechanical circulatory support (propensity matched OR 15.30 (6.87–34.04), ventricular tachycardia (propensity matched OR 4.45 (1.92–10.34), utilization of blood transfusions (propensity matched OR 3.82 (1.86–7.87), acute kidney injury (propensity matched OR 4.02 (1.45–11.13), need for mechanical ventilation (propensity matched OR 8.87 (3.53–22.31), and respiratory failure (propensity matched OR 4.95 (1.83–13.41)))))))). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the two groups. Conclusions: SCAD is a unique condition that can lead to many complications. In our analysis, we showed that SCAD associated with cardiogenic shock compared to SCAD not associated with cardiogenic shock results in greater odds of complications including death, use of mechanical circulatory support, need for blood transfusions, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury, use of mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure. SCAD with cardiogenic shock represents a significantly critical clinical scenario that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to prevent the many potential complications associated with this disease process.