Leggett, Cadman L.

AbstractBackground and AimVolumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is used to identify Barrett's esophagus (BE) dysplasia. Selection of a dysplastic region of interest (ROI) can be challenging due to feature variability across a large amount of data. The degree of agreement among VLE users in selecting a ROI has not been studied.MethodsHigh‐definition videos that divided a VLE scan from 18 patients with biopsy‐proven BE dysplasia into 1‐cm segments were reviewed using a four‐quadrant grid superimposed for systematic interpretation. VLE scans were selected based on image quality and appropriate visualization of BE epithelium. Four experienced VLE users rated each quadrant as dysplastic or non‐dysplastic. For quadrants rated as dysplastic, reviewers selected a single timeframe with representative features. A high‐degree of agreement among reviewers was defined as ≥75% agreement on the quadrant diagnosis and ≥50% agreement on selected timeframe (±2 s).ResultsThirty‐one videos, each 32 s in length, comprising 124 quadrants were reviewed. There was high‐agreement among reviewers in 99 (80%) quadrants, of which 68 (69%) were rated as dysplastic. Compared with quadrants rated as non‐dysplastic, ROIs of quadrants rated as dysplastic contained a higher number of epithelial glands (12.7 vs 1.2, P < 0.001) with atypical architecture (54 vs 1, P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed between the signal intensity profiles of quadrants rated as dysplastic and quadrants rated as non‐dysplastic (P = 0.004).ConclusionThis study highlights that experienced VLE users can identify ROIs with high‐degree of agreement. Selected ROIs contained VLE features associated with BE dysplasia.

Abstract Background and study aims Little is known about the learning curve for image interpretation in volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The goal of this study was to calculate the learning curve, competence of image interpretation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of VLE among novice users. Methods 31 novice users viewed 96 VLE images electronically at three academic institutions after a brief training session. There were 24 images of each histologic type: normal gastric cardia, normal esophageal squamous epithelium, non-neoplastic BE, and neoplastic BE. The users were asked to identify the correct tissue type and level of confidence. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) technique was used to construct a learning curve. Results 22 (71 %) of the physicians achieved VLE interpretation competency during their 96-slide review. Half of the physicians achieved competency at 65 images (95 % confidence interval [CI] 45 – 85). There was a statistically significant association between confidence in diagnosis and selecting the correct histologic tissue type (P < 0.001). The median accuracy for esophageal squamous epithelium, normal gastric cardia, non-neoplastic BE, and neoplastic BE was 96 % (95 %CI 95 % – 96 %), 95 % (95 %CI 94 % – 96 %), 90 % (95 %CI 88 % – 91 %), 96 % (95 %CI 95 % – 96 %). The overall accuracy was 95 % (95 %CI 93 % – 95 %). Conclusion The majority of novice users achieved competence in image interpretation of VLE for BE, using a pre-selected image set, with a favorable learning curve after a brief training session. An electronic review of VLE images, prior to real-time use of VLE, is encouraged.

1 Background: Endoscopic resection (ER) is used to treat early esophageal cancers (EAC). With the advent of techniques such as ESD that can remove large lesions en bloc, it is important to determine if performing piecemeal resections of intramucosal cancers is detrimental. Aim: To evaluate the response rates in patients with esophageal intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) who had a single ER (SR) compared to those treated with piecemeal resection (PR). Methods: This is a cohort study of patients being followed in our BE unit. Patients in a prospectively maintained database with EAC from Jan 1998 to Apr 2012 were assessed. IMC was defined as lesions that were intramucosal without extension into the submucosa. All T1a cancers were verified by two expert gastrointestinal pathologists. We compared the tumor characteristics and recurrence rate between the two groups of SR and PR of IMC. Results: A total of 197 IMC (T1a) lesions in 138 patients were identified. 88(44.7%) lesions were performed SR and 109(55.3%) were PR. Mean follow up time were 45 months (IQR 24-70.5) in SR and 39 months (IQR 26-52, P=0.067) in PR. Complete remission were found of 92.1% (81) in SR and of 93.6% (102) in PR (P=0.788) patients. The recurrence rate was 7.9% in the SR patients, and 6.4% in the PR patients (P=0.699). Median time to progression was 12 months in the SR group (IQR 8-23.5) and 11 months in the PR (IQR 8-22) (P=0.765) group. The mean survival duration was 116.3 months in the SR and 89 months in the PR (P=0.079). No statistical difference in 5-year survival rates was found between SR (83.2%) and PR (80.9%) (P=0.082). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed local recurrence after EMR was not related to number of specimen resected or technique. Conclusions: PR appears to be as effective a therapy as en bloc for esophageal IMC. Using PR does not appear to affect clinical outcomes.

AbstractBackground and AimsPositron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) has been used to detect metastasis in the diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, the utility of PET/CT to assess primary tumor for endoscopic resectability and prognosis in early EAC remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the association of PET/CT findings with histopathological tumor invasion depth and survival outcomes.MethodsEAC patients who underwent PET/CT followed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included. Pathology on EMR and survival outcomes from a prospectively maintained database was retrieved. Two radiologists independently reviewed the PET/CT using the following parameters: detection of malignancy, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake intensity, FDG focality, FDG eccentricity, esophageal thickness, maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), and SUVmax ratio (lesion/liver).ResultsThere were 72 eligible patients: 42 (58.3%) had T1a lesions, and 30 (41.7%) had ≥ T1b. Only SUVmax ratio was associated with tumor invasion depth (odds ratio = 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.26–7.73, P = 0.0075). Using a cut‐off of 1.48, the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax ratio for identification of T1a lesions were 43.3% and 80.9%, respectively. Adjusting the SUVmax ratio to 2.14, 16.7% (5/30) of ≥ T1b patients were identified without any false‐positive cases. Multivariate analysis showed SUVmax ratio, Charlson comorbidity index, and esophagectomy were independent predictors for survival.ConclusionsSUVmax ratio (lesion/liver) is more accurate in predicting endoscopic resectability and mortality for EAC than other PET/CT parameters and appears promising as a useful adjunct to the current diagnostic work‐up.