Blackmon, Shanda

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival difference in clinical T2N0 esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. upfront surgery. Methods Between 1/1/1995 to 12/31/2012, a prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients with cT2N0 esophageal adeno- and squamous cell carcinoma. Exclusion criteria included: lack of endoscopic esophageal ultrasonographic (EUS) staging, incomplete resection, and prior treatment with endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection. Cox-proportional hazard ratios were used to compare the primary outcomes of overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included: rate of postoperative complications, rate of pathologic upstaging/response, and induction/adjuvant treatment completion rate. Pre-hoc subgroup analysis compared pathologically upstaged patients receiving upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy to those treated with neoadjuvant CRT. Results A total of 161 cT2N0 esophageal cancer patients were identified based on EUS staging. Upfront surgery was offered to 134 patients (83%), with 27 patients (17%) receiving induction CRT. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate any significant baseline differences between the two groups. In the upfront surgery group, 53 (39.6%), 28 (20.9%) and 53 (39.6%) patients were pathologically down-staged, accurately staged and upstaged respectively. Upstaging was higher in the upfront surgery group (53/134, 39.6% vs. 4/27, 14.8%; P = 0.02), while 11/27 (40.7%) patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT demonstrated complete pathologic response. Of those eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy, only 21/55 (38.2%) received treatment. In the neoadjuvant CRT group, 51.9% completed all planned therapy, compared to 23.6% of patients treated with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.01). Cox proportional hazard ratio did not demonstrate an advantage to induction CRT in terms of OS (HR = 1.64, P = 0.43) or DFS (HR = 1.36, P = 0.69). In general, patients with pathologic upstaging had worse OS (HR = 2.73, P = 0.001) and DFS (HR = 4.18, P = 0.003). Conclusion EUS was only accurate in staging T2N0 patients in 20.9% of cases. While neoadjuvant CRT did not confer a survival advantage, these results likely reflect the low number of patients being referred for induction therapy. Neoadjuvant CRT was however associated with lower rates of pathologic upstaging and higher rates of treatment completion. Further research should evaluate the survival outcomes in pathologically upstaged cT2N0 patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to analyze the induction therapy regimens employed since publication of CROSS Trial in patients treated with locally advanced EGJ cancer in terms of toxicity, complications, survival and recurrence. Methods Retrospective chart review all patients in single institution prospective database who had neoadjuvant CRT→Surgery 2012–2015. Complications during CRT and after surgery graded using National Cancer Institute CTCAE. Cox-proportion hazard ratios were used to compare the primary outcomes of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results 288 patients, 237 men and 51 women were identified. 246 were adenocarcinoma, 38 squamous cell carcinoma, and 4 had other histologic types. 4 distinct neoadjuvant regimens were observed: 50.4 Gy radiation with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (N = 22), CROSS regimen (41.4 Gy with carboplatin & paclitaxel) (N = 44), 50.4 Gy with carboplatin and paclitaxel (N = 152), and ‘Other’ which include 27 distinct regimens (N = 70). There were no differences in treatment related complications or postoperative complications between regimens. There was no difference in pathologic complete response rate, OS, or DFS between regimens. Conclusion Since the publication of the CROSS Trial, there is a significant heterogenity in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment regimen employed for patients with locally advanced EGJ tumors. Does not appear to be any differences in treatment related complications or postoperative complications between regimens. There was also no difference in pCR, overall survival or disease-free survival. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

AbstractIntroductionTo evaluate the outcomes of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during transvenous lead extractions (TLEs).Methods and resultsNinety‐one high‐risk patients who underwent TLE in the operating room from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, were included in the study. Of these, 9 patients underwent VATS during TLE. Their clinical characteristics, indications for lead extraction, and complications associated with TLE in the 9 patients who had VATS were compared with those for the 82 patients who did not have VATS. The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 61 (17) years (64.8% were male). The lead dwell time, number of leads extracted, and clinical comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. Superior vena cava (SVC) tear occurred in 2 of the 9 patients in VATS group and in 1 of the 82 in the non‐VATS group (22.2% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.03). Of the 2 patients in the VATS group who had SVC tears, in 1 the tear was visualized immediately and there was no hemodynamic compromise. In the other patient, the SVC tear was within the pericardium; the blood pressure recovered quickly after sternotomy and repair. Both patients had complete lead extraction and survived hospitalization. The patient in the non‐VATS group who had an SVC tear had a successful repair but died of postoperative complications.ConclusionsUtilization of VATS to facilitate TLE is beneficial for early recognition of SVC tear and timely surgical repair in select high‐risk patients.

Objective Microlobectomy is a novel form of videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Strict inclusion criteria consist of the following: no intercostal incisions greater than 5 mm, 12 mm subxiphoid port, subxiphoid removal of the specimen, total endoscopic technique with CO 2 insufflation, vision through a 5-mm camera, stapling via the subxiphoid port, or with 5-mm stapling devices. Methods The combined early experiences of six hospitals from three countries were combined from September 2014 to May 2016. During that time, the study represents a consecutive cohort study of this technique. Results Seventy-two patients underwent microlobectomy. The median (range) age was 66 (27–82). Half of the patients were female. There were 48 right-sided resections and 24 on the left. There were four segmental resections and there was one right pneumonectomy. Four operations were performed robotically (with 8-mm intercostal incisions). The median (range) operative time was 180 (94–285) minutes and the blood loss was 118 (5–800) mL. There were three conversions to thoracotomy and two conversions to videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery by means of an intercostal utility incision to complete the operation. The median (range)length of stay was 3(1–44) days and 30 patients (42%) when home by day 2 and 16 patients (22%) were discharged on day 1. There were no deaths. Five patients (7%) had a prolonged airleak. There were no wound infections and there was one incisional hernia. Conclusions We believe that microlobectomy is an interesting novel form of videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and has several theoretical advantages. We have presented our early results and hope that this will stimulate others to investigate this type of videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy further.

AbstractBackgroundFundoplication surgery is a commonly performed procedure for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia repair. Up to 10% of patients develop persistent postoperative dysphagia after surgery. Data on the effectiveness of pneumatic dilation for treatment are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify clinical factors associated with successful response to pneumatic dilation among patients with persistent postfundoplication dysphagia (PPFD).MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone pneumatic dilation for PPFD between 1999 and 2016. Patients with dysphagia or achalasia prior to fundoplication were excluded. Demographic information, surgical history, severity of dysphagia, and clinical outcomes were collected. Data pertaining to esophagram, manometry, endoscopy, and pneumatic dilation were also collected.ResultsWe identified 38 patients (82% female, 95% Caucasian, and median age 59 years) with PPFD who completed pneumatic dilation. The median postfundoplication dysphagia score was 2. Eleven patients had abnormal peristalsis on manometry. Seventeen patients reported response (seven complete) with an average decrease of 1 in their dysphagia score. Fifteen patients underwent reoperation due to PPFD. Hiatal hernia repair was the only factor that predicts a higher response rate to pneumatic dilation. Only one patient in our study developed complication (pneumoperitoneum) from pneumatic dilation.Conclusion & InferencesWe found that pneumatic dilation to be a safe treatment option for PPFD with moderate efficacy. Patients who developed PPFD after a hiatal hernia repair may gain the greatest benefit after pneumatic dilation. We were not able to identify additional clinical, radiological, endoscopic, or manometric parameters that were predictive of response.