Back to Authors

Smoot, Dustin L.

Mayo Clinic

Iowa Methodist Medical Center

Citations 2

Intravenous Metoprolol Versus Diltiazem for Rate Control in Noncardiac, Nonthoracic Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Personett, Heather A. , Smoot, Dustin L., Stollings, Joanna L. , Sawyer, Mark H., Oyen, Lance J.

Annals of Pharmacotherapy | January 10, 2014 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 314-319

10.1177/1060028013512473 Get It

Background: Little guidance exists on effective management of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following noncardiac, nonthoracic (NCNT) surgery. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify whether a difference exists between intravenous (IV) metoprolol and diltiazem when used to achieve hemodynamically stable rate control in POAF following NCNT surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined critically ill adult surgical patients experiencing POAF with rapid ventricular response. Inclusion in the metoprolol or diltiazem treatment group was determined by the initial rate control agent chosen by the prescriber. The primary end point was hemodynamically stable rate control, defined by heart rate (HR) <110 beats/min and blood pressure >90 mm Hg, maintained for 6 hours. Main Results: Patients on metoprolol (n = 66) and diltiazem (n = 55) were similar in age, comorbidities, surgical procedure distribution, acuity of illness, and home rate and rhythm control medications continued during hospitalization; 76% of diltiazem-treated patients achieved hemodynamically stable rate control, compared with only 53% of those receiving metoprolol ( P = .005). Safety end points were similar between groups, including the portion requiring a new vasopressor or fluid bolus for hemodynamic support. Conclusions: In NCNT surgery, patients with POAF, IV diltiazem more effectively controlled HR and hemodynamics compared with metoprolol. Results warrant further research into optimal medical management of POAF in this population using these 2 agents.
The development and feasibility of a remote damage control resuscitation prehospital plasma transfusion protocol for warfarin reversal for patients with traumatic brain injury
Zielinski, Martin D. , Smoot, Dustin L., Stubbs, James R. , Jenkins, Donald H. , Park, Myung S., Zietlow, Scott P.

Transfusion | January 10, 2013 | Volume: 53 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/trf.12037 Get It

BackgroundThe rapid reversal of warfarin in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been associated with improved outcomes. Until now, remote reversal of hypocoagulable states has not been possible in the prehospital environment. This manuscript describes the development and analysis of a prehospital plasma transfusion protocol to reverse warfarin at the earliest possible moment after TBI.Study Design and MethodsA retrospective review of all TBI patients receiving plasma transfusion(s) in the prehospital environment for warfarin reversal between February 2009 and September 2010 was conducted. Thawed plasma was carried on every air ambulance flight centered at the main campus.ResultsA total of 2836 flights carried over 2500 units of thawed plasma throughout the study period. During this time, 16 patients received prehospital plasma resuscitation, five of who were on warfarin with a concurrent TBI. The median Injury Severity Score was 17 (8.5‐27.5) with a median Glasgow Coma Score of 13 (8‐15) and a mortality rate of 40%. A median of 2 (1.5‐2.0) units of thawed plasma and 0 (0‐0) units of RBCs were transfused en route. The pretransfusion point‐of‐care international normalized ratio improved from 3.1 (2.3‐4.0) to 1.9 (1.3‐3.6) upon trauma center admission (serum sample). One hundred percent of the transported, but unused, thawed plasma underwent subsequent transfusion prior to expiration.ConclusionsRemote prehospital plasma transfusions effectively reverse anticoagulation secondary to warfarin administration in TBI patients. It is feasible to transfuse thawed plasma in the prehospital setting via remote damage control techniques without increasing waste. Prospective studies are needed to determine if this practice can improve outcomes in this population.