Metz, Imke

AbstractObjectiveIn this observational study on a cohort of biopsy‐proven central nervous system demyelinating disease consistent with MS, we examined the relationship between early‐active demyelinating lesion immunopattern (IP) with subsequent clinical course, radiographic progression, and cognitive function.MethodsSeventy‐five patients had at least one early‐active lesion on biopsy and were pathologically classified into three immunopatterns based on published criteria. The median time from biopsy at follow‐up was 11 years, median age at biopsy ‐ 41, EDSS ‐ 4.0. At last follow‐up, the median age was 50, EDSS ‐ 3.0. Clinical examination, cognitive assessment (CogState battery), and 3‐Tesla‐MRI (MPRAGE/FLAIR/T2/DIR/PSIR/DTI) were obtained.ResultsIP‐I was identified in 14/75 (19%), IP‐II was identified in 41/75 (56%), and IP‐III was identified in 18/75 (25%) patients. Patients did not differ significantly by immunopattern in clinical measures at onset or last follow‐up. The proportions of disease courses after a median of 11 years were similar across immunopatterns, relapsing–remitting being most common (63%), followed by monophasic (32%). No differences in volumetric or DTI measures were found. CogState performance was similar for most tasks. A slight yet statistically significant difference was identified for episodic memory scores, with IP‐III patients recalling one word less on average.InterpretationIn this study, immunopathological heterogeneity of early‐active MS lesions identified at biopsy does not correlate with different long‐term clinical, neuroimaging or cognitive outcomes. This could be explained by the fact that while active white matter lesions are pathological substrates for relapses, MS progression is driven by mechanisms converging across immunopatterns, regardless of pathogenic mechanisms driving the acute demyelinated plaque.

AbstractAlthough major progress in multiple sclerosis research has been made during the last decades, key questions related to the cause and the mechanisms of brain and spinal cord pathology remain unresolved. These cover a broad range of topics, including disease aetiology, antigenic triggers of the immune response inside and/or outside the CNS and mechanisms of inflammation, demyelination neurodegeneration and tissue repair. Most of these questions can be addressed with novel molecular technologies in the injured CNS. Access to brain and spinal cord tissue from multiple sclerosis patients is, therefore, of critical importance. High-quality tissue is provided in part by the existing brain banks. However, material from early and highly active disease stages is limited. An initiative, realized under the patronage of the European Charcot Foundation, gathered together experts from different disciplines to analyse the current state of multiple sclerosis tissues collected post-mortem or as biopsies. Here, we present an account of what material is currently available and where it can be accessed. We also provide recommendations on how tissue donation from patients in early disease stages could be potentially increased and for procedures of tissue sampling and preservation. We also suggest to create a registry of the available tissues that, depending on the source (autopsy versus biopsy), could be made accessible to clinicians and researchers.