Back to Authors

Playdon, Mary C

0000-0001-6082-0447

Mayo Clinic

University of Utah

Citations 2

Metabolic and bariatric surgery and obesity pharmacotherapy for cancer prevention: current status and future possibilities
Hardikar, Sheetal , Karra, Prasoona , Hoobler, Rachel , Ibele, Anna , Cook, Katherine L. , Kumar, Amanika , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Brown, Justin C. , Brown, Justin C. , Cook, Katherine L , Ippolito, Joseph E , Brown, Justin C , Kumar, Amanika , Playdon, Mary C

JNCI Monographs | May 4, 2023 | Volume: 2023 | Issue: 61 | Pages: 68-76

10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad003 Get It

Abstract Obesity is a chronic, relapsing, progressive disease of excess adiposity that increases the risk of developing at least 13 types of cancer. This report provides a concise review of the current state of the science regarding metabolic and bariatric surgery and obesity pharmacotherapy related to cancer risk. Meta-analyses of cohort studies report that metabolic and bariatric surgery is independently associated with a lower risk of incident cancer than nonsurgical obesity care. Less is known regarding the cancer-preventive effects of obesity pharmacotherapy. The recent approval and promising pipeline of obesity drugs will provide the opportunity to understand the potential for obesity therapy to emerge as an evidence-based cancer prevention strategy. There are myriad research opportunities to advance our understanding of how metabolic and bariatric surgery and obesity pharmacotherapy may be used for cancer prevention.
Large-scale Integrated Analysis of Genetics and Metabolomic Data Reveals Potential Links Between Lipids and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Shu, Xiao-Ou , Chen, Zhishan, Long, Jirong, Guo, Xingyi, Yang, Yaohua , Qu, Conghui, Ahn, Yoon-Ok, Cai, Qiuyin , Casey, Graham, Gruber, Stephen B. , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Jee, Sun Ha, Jenkins, Mark A., Jia, Wei-Hua, Jung, Keum Ji, Kamatani, Yoichiro, Kim, Dong-Hyun, Marchand, Loic Le, Newcomb, Polly A., Oh, Jae Hwan, Ose, Jennifer , Pai, Rish K. , Pan, Zhi-Zhong, Ren, Ze-Fang, Shin, Aesun, Sun, Xiaohui, Tangen, Catherine M., Tanikawa, Chizu, Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Guelpen, Bethany Van , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H., Peters, Ulrike , Jee, Sun Ha , Chen, Zhishan , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Kim, Jeongseon , Kweon, Sun-Seog , Matsuda, Koichi , Matsuo, Keitaro , Ose, Jennifer , Oze, Isao , Pai, R K , Pharoah, Paul D P , Playdon, Mary C , Schoen, Robert E , Shin, Min‐Ho , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Ulrich, Cornelia M , van Duijnhoven, Fränzel J B , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Wolk, Alicja , Woods, Michael O , Peters, Ulrike , Zheng, Wei , Gruber, Stephen B , Cai, Qiuyin , Chen, Zhishan, Long, Jirong, Guo, Xingyi, Yang, Yaohua , Qu, Conghui, Ahn, Yoon-Ok, Casey, Graham, Huyghe, Jeroen R , Jenkins, Mark A., Jia, Wei-Hua, Jung, Keum Ji, Kamatani, Yoichiro, Kim, Dong-Hyun, Marchand, Loic Le, Newcomb, Polly A., Oh, Jae Hwan, Pan, Zhi-Zhong, Ren, Ze-Fang, Shin, Aesun, Sun, Xiaohui, Tangen, Catherine M., Tanikawa, Chizu, Wu, Anna H.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 10, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1216-1226

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1008 Get It

Abstract Background: The etiology of colorectal cancer is not fully understood. Methods: Using genetic variants and metabolomics data including 217 metabolites from the Framingham Heart Study (n = 1,357), we built genetic prediction models for circulating metabolites. Models with prediction R2 > 0.01 (Nmetabolite = 58) were applied to predict levels of metabolites in two large consortia with a combined sample size of approximately 46,300 cases and 59,200 controls of European and approximately 21,700 cases and 47,400 controls of East Asian (EA) descent. Genetically predicted levels of metabolites were evaluated for their associations with colorectal cancer risk in logistic regressions within each racial group, after which the results were combined by meta-analysis. Results: Of the 58 metabolites tested, 24 metabolites were significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk [Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (BH-FDR) < 0.05] in the European population (ORs ranged from 0.91 to 1.06; P values ranged from 0.02 to 6.4 × 10−8). Twenty one of the 24 associations were replicated in the EA population (ORs ranged from 0.26 to 1.69, BH-FDR < 0.05). In addition, the genetically predicted levels of C16:0 cholesteryl ester was significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk in the EA population only (OREA: 1.94, 95% CI, 1.60−2.36, P = 2.6 × 10−11; OREUR: 1.01, 95% CI, 0.99−1.04, P = 0.3). Nineteen of the 25 metabolites were glycerophospholipids and triacylglycerols (TAG). Eighteen associations exhibited significant heterogeneity between the two racial groups (PEUR-EA-Het < 0.005), which were more strongly associated in the EA population. This integrative study suggested a potential role of lipids, especially certain glycerophospholipids and TAGs, in the etiology of colorectal cancer. Conclusions: This study identified potential novel risk biomarkers for colorectal cancer by integrating genetics and circulating metabolomics data. Impact: The identified metabolites could be developed into new tools for risk assessment of colorectal cancer in both European and EA populations.