Ezzelarab, Mohamed B.

The persistent shortage of allogenic donor organs has driven the exploration of xenotransplantation as a viable alternative for patients with end-stage liver disease. This review investigates the progress and challenges in liver xenotransplantation, focusing on the use of genetically engineered animals, particularly pigs, as potential organ donors. This narrative review discusses various sources of xenografts, highlighting their advantages and limitations, and provides a historical overview of liver xenotransplantation, encompassing both clinical and experimental experiences. Key obstacles, such as immunological rejection, coagulation dysfunction, and the risk of zoonotic infections, are analyzed, with emphasis on how these challenges have been addressed through genetic modifications and adjunctive therapies. Recent clinical trials are also reviewed, offering insights into the outcomes and lessons learned from these pioneering efforts. We also explored the regulatory, legal, and ethical considerations critical to advancing liver xenotransplantation into clinical practice, along with future perspectives on the field’s evolution. This comprehensive overview aims to provide a clear understanding of the current state of liver xenotransplantation and the strategies being developed to overcome existing barriers, paving the way for future clinical applications.

Abstract Background Scientists working in the field of xenotransplantation do not employ a uniform method to measure and report natural and induced antibody responses to non‐ G alα(1,3) G al (non‐ G al) epitopes. Such humoral responses are thought to be particularly pathogenic after transplantation of vascularized Gal TKO pig organs and having a more uniform assay and reporting format would greatly facilitate comparisons between laboratories. Methods Flow cytometry allows examination of antibody reactivity to intact antigens in their natural location and conformation on cell membranes. We have established a simple and reproducible flow cytometric assay to detect antibodies specific for non‐ G al pig antigens using primary porcine aortic endothelial cells ( pAEC s) and cell culture‐adapted pAEC cell lines generated from wild type and α1,3galactosyl transferase knockout (Gal TKO ) swine. Results The consensus protocol we propose here is based on procedures routinely used in four xenotransplantation centers and was independently evaluated at three sites using shared cells and serum samples. Our observation support use of the cell culture‐adapted Gal TKO pAEC KO :15502 cells as a routine method to determine the reactivity of anti‐non‐ G al antibodies in human and baboon serum. Conclusions We have developed an assay that allows the detection of natural and induced non‐Gal xenoreactive antibodies present in human or baboon serum in a reliable and consistent manner. This consensus assay and format for reporting the data should be accessible to laboratories and will be useful for assessing experimental results between multiple research centers. Adopting this assay and format for reporting the data should facilitate the detection, monitoring, and detailed characterization of non‐ G al antibody responses.

AbstractThe histopathology of cardiac xenograft rejection has evolved over the last 20 yr with the development of new modalities for limiting antibody‐mediated injury, advancing regimens for immune suppression, and an ever‐widening variety of new donor genetics. These new technologies have helped us progress from what was once an overwhelming anti‐Gal‐mediated hyperacute rejection to a more protracted anti‐Gal‐mediated vascular rejection to what is now a more complex manifestation of non‐Gal humoral rejection and coagulation dysregulation. This review summarizes the changing histopathology of Gal‐ and non‐Gal‐mediated cardiac xenograft rejection and discusses the contributions of immune‐mediated injury, species‐specific immune‐independent factors, transplant and therapeutic procedures, and donor genetics to the overall mechanism(s) of cardiac xenograft rejection.

AbstractBackgroundBortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor used to treat multiple myeloma, has been administered (± plasma exchange ± intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg]) in attempts to reduce antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in sensitized patients undergoing organ transplantation. To our knowledge, bortezomib has not been investigated for its effect on natural anti‐pig antibodies. If bortezomib could reduce the production of anti‐pig antibodies, this would likely be beneficial to the outcome of pig organ grafts in primates.MethodsNine patients received bortezomib either to reduce anti‐HLA antibody levels before organ allotransplantation or to treat antibody‐mediated rejection. Patients at the Mayo Clinic (Group 1; n = 4) received bortezomib alone, whereas at the UPMC (Group 2; n = 5), this was combined with plasmaphereses ± IVIg in some cases. Anti‐pig IgM and IgG levels against wild‐type (WT) and α1,3‐galactosyltransferase gene knockout (GTKO) pig aortic endothelial cells (flow cytometry—relative mean fluorescence intensity) and anti‐Gal IgM and IgG (ELISA–OD480 nm) were measured pre‐ and post‐bortezomib therapy.ResultsMean anti‐pig IgM levels were 11.2 (WT) and 1.9 (GTKO) pre‐bortezomib treatment and 9.4 (WT: P = 0.02) and 1.7 (GTKO: P = 0.33) post‐bortezomib treatment, respectively. Mean anti‐pig IgG levels were 4.3 (WT) and 1.5 (GTKO) pre‐bortezomib treatment and 3.6 (WT: P = 0.21) and 1.4 (GTKO: P = 0.20) post‐bortezomib treatment, respectively. Mean anti‐Gal IgM and IgG levels were 0.7 and 1.1, respectively, pre‐treatment, and 0.6 (P = 0.03) and 1.1 (NS), respectively, post‐treatment. When the data were analyzed in Groups 1 and 2 separately, there were no significant differences between the pre‐ and post‐bortezomib levels of anti‐pig, anti‐non‐Gal, or anti‐Gal IgM or IgG.ConclusionsFrom this limited study, we conclude that bortezomib might reduce anti‐Gal IgM levels in primates, but, in this respect alone, is unlikely to have any significant effect on the outcome of GTKO pig organ transplantation.