Arenaza-Urquijo, Eider M

AbstractBackgroundThere have been no standard definitions of successful cognitive aging (SA). Our goal was to apply different SA definitions to the 80+ population in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) on the basis of (i) cross‐sectional vs longitudinal cognition (“Exceptionality” vs “Maintenance”) and (ii) memory vs global cognitive scores and explore the participant characteristics for each SA definition on the basis of baseline imaging markers and mid/late‐life health.MethodWe included 2157 participants from the MCSA, all ≥80 years at baseline and classified them into two SA definitions using memory z‐scores or global z‐scores: “Exceptionality” when high cognitive performance was observed (z‐scores ≥ 1 SD), “Maintenance” when cognitive function was preserved over time (Slope ≥ ‐0.1/year using mixed‐effect models). Our imaging markers were: PET‐based amyloid positivity (A+), MRI‐based neurodegeneration positivity (N+), WMH, FDG‐PET SUVR markers of resilience (anterior cingulate, ACC) and AD‐related areas (posterior cingulate). We also examined APOE4 status and other health characteristics. Group comparison was performed within each definition (e.g. exceptional vs non‐exceptional memory) using ANCOVA and binary logistic regressions with adjustments for age, sex, and education.ResultA lower number of participants met the “Exceptionality” criteria (10%: memory and 4%: global). A greater number met the “Maintenance” criteria (53%: memory and 32%: global). Less than 7% showed both “Exceptional” cognition and “Maintenance” over time. Participants across SA definitions were in general younger, more often women, with a higher education/occupation and less often APOE4 carriers. All SA groups showed higher ACC metabolism and lower N+ compared to the corresponding non‐SA group. More than 50% of the participants in the “Exceptional” groups were A+ (57%: memory, 50%: global). A+ frequency was significantly lower in the “Maintainers” (<42%). Better mid/late‐life health indicators were observed in the SA groups, including lower cardio‐metabolic conditions, higher mid‐life cognitive activities, lower depressive symptomatology, lower hypersomnolence and better self‐perception of health.ConclusionDifferent SA definitions identified mainly non‐overlapping 80+ groups that showed several common features including higher education/occupation, percent of women, better lifestyles, lower N+ frequency, and higher ACC metabolism. Lower A+ frequency was a key distinct feature of “Maintenance”.

AbstractIntroductionHarboring two copies of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε2 allele strongly protects against Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the effect of this genotype on gray matter (GM) volume in cognitively unimpaired individuals has not yet been described.MethodsMulticenter brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from cognitively unimpaired ε2 homozygotes were matched (1:1) against all other APOE genotypes for relevant confounders (n = 223). GM volumes of ε2 genotypic groups were compared to each other and to the reference group (APOE ε3/ε3).ResultsCarrying at least one ε2 allele was associated with larger GM volumes in brain areas typically affected by AD and also in areas associated with cognitive resilience. APOE ε2 homozygotes, but not APOE ε2 heterozygotes, showed larger GM volumes in areas related to successful aging.DiscussionIn addition to the known resistance against amyloid‐β deposition, the larger GM volumes in key brain regions may confer APOE ε2 homozygotes additional protection against AD‐related cognitive decline.

Abstract Although white matter hyperintensities have traditionally been viewed as a marker of vascular disease, recent pathology studies have found an association between white matter hyperintensities and Alzheimer’s disease pathologies. The objectives of this study were to investigate the topographic patterns of white matter hyperintensities associated with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers measured using PET. From the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, 434 participants without dementia (55% male) with FLAIR and gradient recall echo MRI, tau-PET (AV-1451) and amyloid-PET scans were identified. A subset had cerebral microbleeds detected on T2* gradient recall echo scans. White matter hyperintensities were semi-automatically segmented using FLAIR MRI in participant space and normalized to a custom template. We used statistical parametric mapping 12-based, voxel-wise, multiple-regression analyses to detect white matter hyperintense regions associated with Alzheimer’s biomarkers (global amyloid from amyloid-PET and meta-regions of interest tau uptake from tau-PET) after adjusting for age, sex and hypertension. For amyloid associations, we additionally adjusted for tau and vice versa. Topographic patterns of amyloid-associated white matter hyperintensities included periventricular white matter hyperintensities (frontal and parietal lobes). White matter hyperintense volumes in the detected topographic pattern correlated strongly with lobar cerebral microbleeds (P < 0.001, age and sex adjusted Cohen’s d = 0.703). In contrast, there were no white matter hyperintense regions significantly associated with increased tau burden using voxel-based analysis or region-specific analysis. Among non-demented elderly, amyloid load correlated with a topographic pattern of white matter hyperintensities. Further, the amyloid-associated, white matter hyperintense regions strongly correlated with lobar cerebral microbleeds suggesting that cerebral amyloid angiopathy contributes to the relationship between amyloid and white matter hyperintensities. The study did not support an association between increased tau burden and white matter hyperintense burden.

Background: Although white matter hyperintensities (WMH) have been viewed as a marker of vascular disease, pathology studies have found an association of WMH with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathologies. Our objective was to investigate the topographic patterns of WMH associated with AD biomarkers. Methods: From the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of aging, 434 non-demented participants with FLAIR-MRI, tau-PET and PiB-PET scans were identified. A subset had microbleeds on T2* GRE scans. We ran SPM12 based voxel-wise multiple regression analyses to detect WMH regions associated with AD biomarkers (global amyloid from PiB-PET and meta-ROI tau uptake from tau-PET) adjusting for age, sex, and hypertension. For amyloid associations, we additionally adjusted for tau and vice versa. Results: Topographic patterns of WMH associated with amyloid after both voxel and cluster level corrections primarily included periventricular WMH (frontal and parietal lobes). Masks with lenient threshold (greater detection sensitivity) and strict thresholds (greater detection specificity) are shown in the figure. (A) and (B) show the areas of positive associations between PIB ratio and WMHs adjusted by age, sex, education, hypertension and Tau meta ROI. The sensitive mask (A) was thresholded at FDR p<0.05 at voxel level and FWE p<0.05 at cluster level. The specific mask (B) was thresholded at FDR p<0.001 at voxel level and FDR p<0.05 at cluster level. (C) Shows the frequency of WMHs in the study sample, ranging from infrequent (dark blue) to frequent (green to red). Both the sensitive (p<0.001, Cohen’s D=0.615) and specific WMH maps (p<0.001, Cohen’s D = 0.705) were associated with microbleeds. No WMH regions were associated with tau. Conclusion: Amyloid but not tau load on PET was associated with WMH topographically. The WMH regions associated with amyloid were associated with CMBs suggesting that cerebral amyloid angiopathy may be contributing to the relationship between amyloid and WMH.