Back to Authors

Lara, Nina J

0000-0002-3648-3732

Mayo Clinic

OrthoArizona, Division of Spine Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Citations 3

Pediatric Extramedullary Epidural Spinal Teratomas: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Deckey, David G. , Fernandez, Andrea, Lara, Nina , McClendon, Jamal, Bennett, David M. , Lara, Nina J , Bennett, David M , Taylor, Steve

Case Reports in Orthopedics | October 8, 2021 | Volume: 2021 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-8

10.1155/2021/6702972 Get It

Background. Teratomas in the pediatric population are most commonly found in the sacrococcygeal region. Pediatric intraspinal teratomas, however, are an exceedingly rare central nervous system (CNS) neoplasm. The clinical presentation of these intraspinal neoplasms can vary significantly and thus can be difficult to identify in infants less than one year of age where verbal expression and motor development are still lacking. Case Description. A 7-month-old, previously healthy male presented with a thoracic scoliosis and an asymptomatic right midupper thoracic spinal prominence present since birth. MRI revealed an extensive heterogenous mass in the right epidural space from T5-T6 and the right paravertebral space, resulting in severe spinal stenosis. Outcome. Complete resection of the tumor, including a three-level neurotomy, was achieved by posterior decompression/laminectomy. The final tumor was consistent with a mature teratoma. The surgical resection was performed without any immediate complications. Conclusions. Extramedullary epidural teratomas are exceptionally rare tumors in the pediatric population. Clinical presentation can be ambiguous, particularly in an infant. MRI was useful in suggesting a teratoma as a potential diagnosis and for postoperative surveillance for recurrence. However, histopathological analysis remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, especially in the setting of cord compression and progressive loss of motor function. Close follow-up is crucial to monitor for progressive spinal deformity or recurrence.
Does Laterality Matter? The Effect of Unilateral v. Bilateral Sacroiliac Screw Fixation on Personal Hygiene
Deckey, David G. , Gulbrandsen, Matthew T. , Hinckley, Nathaniel B. , Lara, Nina , Mayfield, Cory K. , Makovicka, Justin L. , Adeniyi, Biodun, Lara, Nina J , Chang, Michael S.

Global Spine Journal | May 18, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1036-1041

10.1177/21925682211015675 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective comparative analysis of prospective cohort. Objective: To determine whether sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation ipsilateral to hand dominance compared to bilateral fixation impacts personal hygiene (wiping) after toileting. Methods: Inclusion criteria were adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with long arthrodesis (≥T12-pelvis) who had undergone primary unilateral or bilateral SI fixation with a minimum of 2-years-follow-up. Results: 117 consecutive patients were included and separated into 2 groups: bilateral SI fixation (BL, n = 61) and unilateral SI fixation (UNI, n = 56), with no difference in age. Of UNI patients, 10.7% (6) performed personal hygiene with a different hand after surgery, compared to 6.6% (4) of patients who received BL fixation ( P = 0.422). All UNI patients who switched hands were right-hand dominant, and 5/6 received right-sided fixation. There was no statistical difference found between number of levels fused (<8, 9-11, or >11 levels) and changes in personal hygiene habits. Over a third of patients from both groups had difficulty performing personal hygiene after fusion (UNI = 39.3% BL = 36.1%, P = 0.719). Conclusion: SI screws increase the difficulty of performing personal hygiene; yet, the side of unilateral screws does not significantly change personal hygiene habits when compared to bilateral screw placement. Moreover, the length of the construct does not have a significant impact on ability to perform personal hygiene, cause changes in habits, or require the assistance of another individual. However, among our sample of individuals, bilateral fixation did result in a higher rate of revision instrumentation.
Ninety-Day Readmission in Elective Revision Lumbar Fusion Surgery in the Inpatient Setting
Hydrick, Thomas C. , Rubel, Nicholas , Renfree, Sean P. , Lara, Nina , Makovicka, Justin L. , Cho, Samuel , Rubel, Nicolas, Renfree, Sean , Chung, Andrew, Lara, Nina J , Chang, Michael, Chung, Andrew S.

Global Spine Journal | November 10, 2019 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1027-1033

10.1177/2192568219886535 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective review. Objectives: (1) Identify the 90-day rate of readmission following revision lumbar fusion, (2) identify independent risk factors associated with increased rates of readmission within 90 days, (3) and identify the hospital costs associated with revision lumbar fusion and subsequent readmission within 90 days. Methods: Utilizing 2014 data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients undergoing elective revision lumbar fusion were identified. With this sample, multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of readmission within 90 days. An analysis of total hospital costs was also conducted. Results: In 2014, an estimated 14 378 patients underwent elective revision lumbar fusion. The readmission rate at 90 days was 3.1% (n = 446). Diabetes with chronic complications was the only comorbidity found to carry significantly increased odds of readmission. Surgical complications such as deep venous thrombosis, surgical wound disruption, hematoma, and pneumonia (experienced during the index admission) were also independent predictors of readmission. Anterior approaches were associated with increased odds of readmission. The most common related diagnoses on readmission were hardware issues, postoperative infection, and disc herniation. Readmissions were associated with an average of $96 152 in increased hospital costs per patient compared with those not readmitted. Conclusion: Relevant patient comorbidities and surgical complications were associated with increased readmission within 90 days. Readmission within 90 days was associated with significant increases in hospital costs.