Clark, Heather M

Purpose: This letter addresses a recent paper by Mailend et al. (2025) that expressed concerns about the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS) and offered guidelines and definitions regarding its principles, scale labels, item definitions, and scoring procedures, including the addition of new items to the scale. The primary purpose of this letter is to clarify the uncertainty that other users of the scale may have about whether the current ASRS version (ASRS 3.5; Duffy et al., 2023) should be altered to include the numerous proposed revisions. It provides examples of proposed revisions that, in our judgment, are helpful, redundant, questionable or premature, or are misaligned with the primary purposes of the scale. Conclusions: Some of the proposed revisions to the ASRS are helpful and likely to improve reliability by reducing user uncertainty about ratings. Others are questionable or premature without supporting data or are not aligned with the primary purposes of the scale.

Abstract Background Dysphagia can lead to fatal aspiration pneumonia in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Little is known about the longitudinal progression of dysphagia or whether it differs across PSP clinical variants. Objectives To characterize longitudinal changes in dysphagia across PSP variants and determine relationships with disease severity and rate of atrophy in PSP‐related regions. Methods Sixty‐one PSP patients were recruited and underwent at least two serial evaluations, comprising neurological and videofluorographic exams, and MRI. Variables‐of‐interest were the oral and pharyngeal total sum scores (OTSS/PTSS) from the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and lingual pressure assessments. Rates of change were compared across PSP variants and related to baseline scores, PSP Rating Scale and regional brain atrophy rates. Results Dysphagia progressed longitudinally, particularly with worsening in OTSS and anterior and posterior lingual pressures. Rate of change in OTSS was fastest in PSP with predominant speech‐language disorder. Negative correlations were observed between rates of change and baseline scores for OTSS, PTSS and PAS. Rates of change in lingual pressure measures correlated with rates of change in the PSP Rating Scale. Rate of change in the FOIS correlated with rates of change in OTSS and lingual pressure. Rates of brain atrophy were associated with baseline OTSS, PTSS, and PAS. Conclusions Dysphagia and lingual pressure worsen over time in PSP, with variability in rates of change in the OTSS across PSP variants and evidence that dysphagia is related to rates of atrophy.

A retrospective review of multidisciplinary velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) Clinic records from 2010 to 2024 was completed. Inclusion criteria for the review were diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and documented evaluation for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). Adequacy of velopharyngeal closure and perceptual judgment of resonance were identified as primary outcome measures. Surgical interventions and speech outcomes were also described. This review identified 74 children who were diagnosed with CAS and evaluated for VPD in the VPI Clinic. For the subset (n = 50) of children who had surgical intervention, speech therapy, and long-term follow-up, all had improved velopharyngeal closure and resonance.

Objective: Progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by impaired motor speech planning and programming, whereas behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by deviant behavioral (e.g., personality and social) features. Clinical and anatomic characteristics of bvFTD in the context of PAOS are understudied. Methods: We identified 12 participants with PAOS and features that were consistent with bvFTD at baseline or follow-up. Eleven completed a head MRI scan. We compared clinical features and anatomical patterns of atrophy in these 11 PAOS-bvFTD participants to 11 matched PAOS participants without bvFTD and 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) was applied to visualize gray matter volume across both groups compared to controls and each other. Medians and 25th and 75th percentiles were assessed in patients and across groups; Fisher’s Exact Test and Mann–Whitney U tests were applied using BlueSky software, version 10.3.1-Pro. Results: As expected, PAOS-bvFTD participants performed worse on the Frontal Behavioral Inventory (median: 33/72 vs. 10/72), 20-item behavioral assessment scale (4.5/20 vs. 1.0/20), and the Neuropsychiatry inventory (4/36 vs. 1.5/36) compared to the PAOS group (p < 0.01 for all), with no differences in other demographic, neurological, or language tests. Seven of the eleven PAOS-bvFTD participants had bvFTD features develop within three years of symptom onset. The PAOS-bvFTD and PAOS groups showed volume loss in frontal lobe regions compared to controls, with PAOS-bvFTD participants having more prefrontal volume loss than PAOS participants. Conclusions: Behavioral features consistent with bvFTD can co-occur in patients with PAOS and are related to greater atrophy of the prefrontal cortex.

Background: Progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) is a neurodegenerative disorder most commonly arising from a 4-repeat tauopathy that affects the programming or planning of speech, although many patients develop a Parkinson-plus syndrome. The role of neuroinflammation as a disease mechanism is unknown. We investigated the spatial pattern of neuroinflammation in PAOS using PET and evaluated whether it is associated with disease severity, presence of Parkinson-plus features, and tau PET uptake. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five PAOS patients (13 with Parkinson-plus features) and 30 controls underwent inflammatory 11C-ER176 and tau 18F-flortaucipir PET scans as well as detailed clinical assessments. Multiple linear regression analyses compared the inflammatory standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) between PAOS and controls and assessed the relationship with clinical test scores. Pearson correlation analysis examined the relationship between inflammatory and tau SUVRs. Results: PAOS had greater neuroinflammatory SUVR than controls in the precentral, supplementary motor area, frontal gyri, putamen, pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, and red nucleus (adjusted P < 0.05). Greater neuroinflammation was associated with worse parkinsonism, and patients who had developed Parkinson-plus features showed a broader pattern of neuroinflammation, extending to prefrontal, temporal and parietal cortices. Neuroinflammation correlated with tau uptake in most (96%) PAOS patients (r > 0.3, P < 0.05). The higher correlation was associated with worse parkinsonism (r = 0.61, P < 0.05) and disease severity (r = 0.54, P < 0.05). Conclusions: 11C-ER176 PET analysis demonstrates neuroinflammation in frontal and subcortical regions in PAOS which is particularly severe and widespread with the development of Parkinson-plus clinical features. The colocalization of neuroinflammation and tau may support a relationship between these disease mechanisms.

Abstract Background Classic progressive supranuclear palsy RS syndrome (PSP‐RS) is characterized by early postural instability/falls and vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, although other signs/symptoms can occur, for example, axial rigidity, bradykinesia, and cognitive dysfunction. The Movement Disorders Society‐PSP (MDS‐PSP) criteria consider probable PSP‐RS a homogenous syndrome, but this has not been tested. Objectives We aim to investigate relationships between signs/symptoms of PSP‐RS beyond its core features and determine whether PSP‐RS is a homogeneous syndrome. Methods 118 participants who met MDS‐PSP criteria for probable PSP‐RS were analyzed. All participants received an independent clinical diagnosis based on clinical judgment. We first performed a Network Analysis using qgraph with Spearman's correlation to quantify relationships between 16 signs/symptoms followed by a k‐means clustering analysis using the same signs/symptoms to identify possible heterogeneity of the PSP‐RS designation. Results Five network clusters were identified, reflecting: (1) tremor, (2) sensitivity to bright light, (3) oculomotor function, (4) cognition, and (5) akinetic‐rigidity‐praxis. Worse akinetic‐rigidity was associated with better oculomotor function, but worse cognition. Cluster analysis revealed two clusters. Cluster I ( n = 89) had more severe clinical features than Cluster II ( n = 29). Cluster II had a higher frequency of participants (37.9%) clinically judged as not PSP‐RS: these participants were less likely to have PSP pathology on autopsy ( P = 0.03). Conclusions Some signs/symptoms of PSP‐RS strongly associate and are more likely to co‐occur. PSP‐RS, as defined by the MDS‐PSP criteria includes a subset of participants not clinically judged as PSP‐RS who are less likely to have PSP pathology.

Background and Objectives: Hearing loss is relatively common in older individuals, and individuals with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are no exception; this can exacerbate communication difficulties stemming from speech-language impairments. The co-occurrence of these symptoms can contribute to increased frustration and isolation for patients and their communication partners. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of self-administered hearing testing. Ultimately, this could be administered remotely, which would increase access to assessment and inform management for this population. Method: Seventeen patients with underlying FTLD, clinically presenting with progressive apraxia of speech with and without agrammatic aphasia, independently completed the Home Hearing Test supervised while in office. Results: Three patients self-reported hearing loss, but results for 100% recommended formal evaluation. Eleven patients demonstrated good test accuracy. Six patients had “poor” or not computable accuracy; among them, five had evidence of cognitive impairment and/or behavioral changes, and one had known severe hearing loss, although differences between those with good and poor test accuracy were not significant. Patients with poor test accuracy had more difficulty with limb praxis. Conclusions: Most participants independently completed the test, though some had reduced test accuracy that may have been associated with cognitive impairment and/or limb apraxia. This study supports the need for hearing screenings in all patients with progressive apraxia of speech and aphasia and highlights both the feasibility and caution required in implementing self-administered testing protocols. Further work should evaluate the feasibility of in-home hearing screenings in a broader range of FTLD phenotypes and directly compare sensitivity and specificity of hearing loss detection with in-clinic administration. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28306613

Purpose: Speakers with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) have an insidious onset of motor speech planning/programming difficulties. As the disease progresses, the apraxia of speech (AOS) becomes more severe and a co-occurring dysarthria often emerges. Here, longitudinal data from speakers with phonetic- and prosodic-predominant PPAOS are used to characterize the progression of their motor speech impairment, including the development of dysarthria and mutism. Method: Data are presented from 52 speakers who had PPAOS at enrollment (i.e., progressive AOS in the absence of aphasia, cognitive, or other neurologic symptoms). Twenty-one had predominantly phonetic features, whereas 31 had primarily prosodic features. All participants underwent a comprehensive motor speech evaluation at their enrollment visit and each annual return visit, with a median of three visits per participant. Results: Almost 25% of the speakers with PPAOS presented with dysarthria at their enrollment visit (median disease duration of 3.65 years), whereas more than 70% of them had developed dysarthria by their last visit (median disease duration of 6.85 years). Neither the likelihood to develop dysarthria nor the disease duration at which it was detected differed significantly between the phonetic and prosodic groups. However, muteness emerged sooner for speakers with phonetic-predominant PPAOS; the median disease duration at which they became mute was 1.5 years shorter than for their prosodic counterparts. Conclusions: Clinically, these results facilitate more accurate prognostication of motor speech symptoms in speakers with PPAOS, allowing for timely introduction of alternative means of communication. The results also support the differentiation between progressive AOS and dysarthria as distinct motor speech disorders that often co-occur in these individuals.

Purpose: This case report aims to raise awareness among health care professionals and students that acute onset Wernicke's aphasia could be misinterpreted as delirium. In such a context, a patient's psychological/emotional reactions (e.g., agitation, anger) to aphasia associated communication breakdowns can be mismanaged as primary psychiatric concerns. Conclusion: Preliminary suggestions for relevant clinical practice are offered.