Toya, Takumi

Background Peripheral microvascular endothelial dysfunction (PMED) has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but there is a lack of information characterizing the predictive value of PMED for future risk of ischemic stroke (IS). Methods and Results This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled 637 patients who underwent non‐invasive microvascular endothelial function assessment using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry. Reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2 was defined as PMED. Of 280 patients with PMED, 12 (4.3%) patients developed IS, compared with only 4 (1.1%) of 357 patients without PMED during a median follow‐up of 5.3 years. Patients with PMED had lower IS‐free survival compared with patients without PMED (log‐rank P =0.03). Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analyses showed that PMED predicted the incidence of IS, with a HR of 3.43, 95% CI, 1.10–10.63 ( P =0.03); adjusted HR of 3.70, 95% CI, 1.18–11.59 ( P =0.02) after adjusting for sex, smoking history, and atrial fibrillation; adjusted HR of 3.45, 95% CI, 1.11–10.72 ( P =0.03) after adjusting for CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score; adjusted HR of 5.70, 95% CI, 1.40–23.29 ( P =0.02) after adjusting for revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score. Reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index improved discrimination of risk for IS after adding reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index to CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score and revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score. Conclusions PMED was associated with a >3‐fold increased risk of IS. These findings underscore the concept of the systemic nature of endothelial dysfunction, which could act as a potential marker to predict future risk of IS.

Background Coronary artery disease risk factors are associated with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and coronary endothelial dysfunction ( CED ). We hypothesized that CED is associated with increased risk of incident AF among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Methods and Results Three hundred patients with chest pain, nonobstructive coronary artery disease, and no history of AF underwent intracoronary acetylcholine infusion for evaluation of baseline epicardial (decrease in mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter in response to acetylcholine) and microvascular (<50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine) CED . Primary outcome was incident AF over a mean follow‐up period of 10.5±5.5 years. Mean age was 53.3±10.8 years, and 70% were women. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between patients with CED (n=256) and those with normal endothelial function (n=44). Overall, 35 of 300 (12%) patients developed AF , among whom 34 of 35 (97%) had CED at baseline. Compared with normal endothelial function, the presence of CED was associated with 11% increased absolute risk and 5.8‐fold increased relative risk of incident AF . Moreover, CED ( odds ratio , 3.87; 95% CI , 1.27–47.0) and increased (>34 mL/m 2 ) left atrial volume index (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI , 1.60–9.11) were independent predictors of incident AF . Conclusions Patients with normal coronary endothelial function, as compared with those with CED and similar AF risk factors, have significantly lower incidence of AF on long‐term follow‐up. The potential mechanistic link between vascular dysfunction and AF development warrants further investigation.

Heart failure is a common debilitating illness, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, rehospitalisation and societal costs. Current guidelines and position statements emphasise the management of patients with overt symptomatic disease, but the increasing prevalence of congestive heart failure underscores the need to identify and manage patients with early left ventricular dysfunction prior to symptom onset. Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD), classified as stage B heart failure, is defined as depressed left ventricular systolic function in the absence of clinical heart failure. Early initiation of therapies in patients with presumed ALVSD has been shown to lead to better outcomes. In this article, the authors clarify issues surrounding the definition and natural history of ALVSD, outline clinical tools that may be of value in identifying patients with ALVSD and highlight potential opportunities for future investigations to better address aspects of our understanding of this complex syndrome.

Aims Cardiovascular health metrics predict the risk not only of cardiovascular diseases but also of several types of cancers. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction can predict future cardiovascular adverse events, but the predictive value of microvascular endothelial dysfunction for future risk of solid-tumor cancer has not been characterized. Methods A total of 488 patients who underwent microvascular endothelial function assessment using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry were included in this study. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined as a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0. Results Of 221 patients with a baseline reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0, 21 patients (9.5%) were diagnosed with incident solid-tumor cancer during follow-up, whereas of 267 patients with a baseline reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index >2.0, 10 patients (3.7%) were diagnosed with incident solid-tumor cancer during follow-up ( p = 0.009). Patients with a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0 had lower solid-tumor cancer-free survival compared to patients with a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index >2.0 (log-rank p = 0.017) (median follow-up 6.0 (3.0–9.1) years). Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0 predicted the incidence of solid-tumor cancer, with a hazard ratio of 2.52 (95% confidence interval 1.17–5.45; p = 0.019) after adjusting for age, sex, and coronary artery disease, 2.83 (95% confidence interval 1.30–6.17; p = 0.009) after adjusting for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking status, and body mass index >30 kg/m2, 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.21–6.41; p = 0.016) after adjusting for fasting plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure, smoking status (current or former), and body mass index, and 2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.10–5.34; p = 0.028) after adjusting for Framingham risk score. Conclusion Microvascular endothelial dysfunction, as defined by a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0, was associated with a greater than two-fold increased risk of solid-tumor cancer. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction may be a useful marker to predict the future risk of solid-tumor cancer, in addition to its known ability to predict cardiovascular disease. Further research is necessary to develop adequate cancer screening strategies for patients with microvascular endothelial dysfunction.