Back to Authors

Park, Sang Min

0000-0002-7498-4829

Mayo Clinic

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea.

Citations 3

Antibiotic Exposure and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Park, Sun Jae , Kim, Minseo , Jeong, Seogsong , Choi, Seulggie , Kim, Hye Jun , Song, Jihun, Lee, Jaewon, Lee, Ji Won, Jeong, Jihui, Yu, Jiwon , Park, Young Jun , Kim, Hye Jun , Choi, Jiwon , Chang, Jooyoung , Oh, Yun Hwan , Ahn, Joseph C , Park, Sang Min , Lee, Ji‐Won , Chang, Jooyoung , Ahn, Joseph , Park, Sang Min

Journal of the American Heart Association | October 22, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 20 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.124.035888 Get It

Background Antibiotic use may alter gut microbiota, which could be associated with various diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Accordingly, further epidemiological evidence is needed to clarify the potential risk of CVD associated with antibiotic exposure. We evaluated the association between long‐term antibiotic exposure and CVD risk in South Korea. Methods and Results This nationwide retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 2 159 965 individuals aged 40 to 79 years who had no history of antibiotic prescriptions from 2004 to 2005 were included and followed through December 31, 2021. Antibiotic exposure was defined as the cumulative days of antibiotic prescriptions from 2006 to 2010. The primary end point was incident CVD with 2 or more days of hospitalization from 2011 to 2021. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CIs for CVD according to antibiotic exposure were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for a range of covariates. Longer cumulative antibiotic prescription days were associated with an increased risk of CVD. The aHRs for CVD associated with 1 to 14, 15 to 90, 91 to 180, 181 to 364, and ≥365 days of antibiotic exposure were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96–1.01), 1.01 (95% CI, 0.99–1.03), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03–1.08), 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04–1.09), and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07–1.13) compared with those with no antibiotic prescriptions. Conclusions In this large population‐based cohort study of Korean adults, long‐term antibiotic exposure may be associated with a higher risk of CVD. Further research is warranted to establish causality and elucidate the underlying mechanisms for this association.
Reversal of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease among Korean
Jeong, Seogsong , Park, Sun Jae , Ahn, Joseph , Park, Sang Min , Park, Sang Min , Ahn, Joseph C , Oh, Yun Hwan

Medicine | November 28, 2023 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 44 | Pages: e35804

10.1097/md.0000000000035804 Get It

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. However, the association between changes in NAFLD status and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains uncertain. Starting January 1, 2013, participants were followed until the occurrence of CVD event, death, or December 31, 2020. This was a population-based cohort study that included data from adults aged ≥ 20, who underwent 2 consecutive health screenings from 2009 to 2012. NAFLD was defined as a Fatty Liver Index ≥ 60 at each screening. The primary endpoint was a CVD event, which encompassed ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. The association between changes in NAFLD status and the risk of CVD was determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. This cohort comprised 4656,305 adults with a median age of 53 years. During 36,396,968 person-years of follow-up, 238,933 (5.1%) CVD events were observed. Compared to patients with no NAFLD at both screenings, patients who developed NAFLD at the second screening exhibited an increased risk of CVD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–1.17). In contrast, individuals who recovered from NAFLD at the second screening demonstrated a reduced CVD risk compared to those with persistent NAFLD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–0.92). The reversal of NAFLD is associated with a reduced risk of CVD. Therefore, focusing on NAFLD treatment could serve as a clinical target for lowering CVD risk.
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes mellitus by depressive symptom severity: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2011–2016
Lee, Jaewon , Kim, Kyae Hyung , Ahn, Joseph , Kim, Jihoon , Lee, Gyeongsil , Choi, Soo Jung , Park, Sang Min , Park, Sang Min , Ahn, Joseph C , Son, Joung Sik , Oh, Yun Hwan

BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care | June 7, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e002268

10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002268 Get It

Introduction Despite extensive studies on the relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and depression, the associations of depressive symptom severity with prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes remain unclear. We aimed to investigate changes in these outcomes of diabetes as depressive symptoms aggravate. Research design and methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 14 328 participants in the 2011–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were classified into depressive symptom groups of none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depending on their Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in three models adjusted for expanding confounders to evaluate the associations between severity of depressive symptoms and prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of DM. Results As depressive symptom severity worsened, both prevalence and awareness of DM increased regardless of models (p value for trend <0.01 in all models for prevalence and awareness; adjusted OR (aOR) 2.14, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.56 for prevalence in the severe group, model 1; aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.64 for awareness in the moderately severe group, model 1). Notwithstanding higher awareness of diabetes in the moderately severe and severe groups (84.5% and 86.2%, respectively, vs 71.3% in the none group), these groups were treated less (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.55 in the severe group, model 3) or inadequately controlled (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.98 in the moderately severe group, model 3). Conclusions The gap between patients’ higher awareness and lower treatment rate or control of diabetes among individuals with severe depressive symptoms highlights the unmet needs for postdiagnostic multidisciplinary care for patients with comorbid depression and DM.