Otto, Ashley O

Purpose of review To date, more than 30 antiretroviral drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HIV infection. As new drugs with better efficacy and safety profile become available for clinical practice, older drugs are either withdrawn from the market or become no longer actively prescribed. We review hepatotoxicity associated with contemporary antiretroviral drugs, with emphasis on data from the past 3 years. Recent findings Although less robust data exists for side effects of contemporary antiretroviral medications recently approved for the management of HIV (i.e., doravirine, ibalizumab, fostemsavir, cabotegravir), the risks of substantial hepatotoxicity appears to be minimal with these agents. Summary Although newer antiretroviral drugs are better tolerated than their earlier counterparts, they are not completely devoid of adverse drug reactions, including hepatotoxicity. Monitoring patients on antiretroviral therapy for treatment-emergent liver injury should continue to be part of routine clinical care.

Contemporary antiretroviral agents afford enhanced potency and safety for patients living with HIV. Newer antiretroviral drugs are often better tolerated than those initially approved in the early stages of the HIV epidemic. While the safety profile has improved, adverse drug reactions still occur. We have segregated the antiretroviral agents used in contemporary practice into class groupings based on their mechanism of antiviral activity (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and entry inhibitors) while providing a review and discussion of the hepatoxicity seen in the most relevant clinical literature published to date. Clinical literature for individual agents is discussed and agent comparisons afforded within each group in tabular format. Our review will provide a summative overview of the incidence and medications associated with hepatic adverse reactions linked to the use of contemporary antiretroviral drugs.

Antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in people living with HIV (PLWH) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) is complicated, requiring renally adjusted nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and daily administration of non-renally eliminated agents. Recent data in PLWH with ESRD on HD demonstrate maintenance of viral suppression (82% with viral loads (VLs) <50 copies/mL) and favorable safety/tolerability profiles after ARV simplification with a fixed dose combination single tablet [elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF)]. Extrapolation of these data to all F/TAF formulations would allow ARV simplification to most PLWH with ESRD receiving HD. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify if ARV-experienced PLWH with ESRD on HD receiving renally adjusted NRTIs may be simplified to once daily ARV formulations without adverse effects while maintaining viral suppression. This single-center retrospective analysis assessed virologic control (3–12 months) and ARV tolerability post-regimen simplification (primarily NRTI once-daily dose adjustment) in PLWH with ESRD on thrice weekly HD receiving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in an ambulatory clinic. Seventeen PLWH with ESRD on HD were included after documented ARV simplification. At 12 months, 12 patients (71%) remained undetectable (HIV VL <50 copies/mL) with two additional maintaining viral suppression (<200 copies/mL). One patient remained undetectable at month eight but became non-adherent with viral rebound. Two patients did not complete the 6- and 12-month evaluation after documented nonadherence ( N = 1) and an adverse effect (pruritus) ( N = 1). At 12 months, virologic suppression and tolerability resulted after a simplified ARV regimen including once daily F/TAF was initiated in PLWH with ESRD on thrice weekly HD with a reduction in pill burden.