Back to Authors

Vestergaard, Hanne

0000-0002-9354-8221

Mayo Clinic

Mastocytosis Center and.

Citations 1

Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21)
Han, Se young, Mrózek, Krzysztof , Morgan, Elizabeth A. , Vestergaard, Hanne , Ohgami, Robert S. , Kluin, Philip M., Kristensen, Thomas Kielsgaard , Pullarkat, Sheeja T. , Møller, Michael , Kim, Young , Czuchlewski, David R., Hilberink, Jacobien R. , Horny, Hans-Peter, Dolan, Michelle, Ku, Nam K., Yi, Cecilia Arana , Pullarkat, Vinod , Kohlschmidt, Jessica, Salhotra, Amandeep , Soma, Lori , Bloomfield, Clara D. , Chen, Dong , Sperr, Wolfgang R. , Marcucci, Guido , Cho, Christina , Broesby‐Olsen, Sigurd , Larson, Melissa L., Deeg, H. Joachim , Hoermann, Gregor , Litzow, Mark R. , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Weisdorf, Daniel J. , Huls, Gerwin , Valent, Peter , Üstün, Celalettin , Morgan, Elizabeth A , Vestergaard, Hanne , Møller, Michael Boe , Schiefer, Ana-Iris , Hilberink, Jacobien R , Arana Yi, Cecilia , Deeg, H Joachim , Perales, Miguel-Angel , Litzow, Mark R. , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Weisdorf, Dan , Valent, Peter , Ustun, Celalettin , Yeung, Cecilia , Chen, Dong , Sperr, Wolfgang , Voutsinas, Jenna M. , Wu, Qian Vicky , Baughn, Linda B. , George, Tracy I. , Akin, Cem , Gotlib, Jason , Linden, Michael A. , Perales, Miguel‐Angel , Hornick, Jason L. , Borthakur, Gautam , Yeung, Cecilia C.S.

Blood Advances | May 18, 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2481-2489

10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003605 Get It

Abstract Patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), caused by either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), have higher complete remission rates and longer survival than patients with other subtypes of AML. However, ∼40% of patients relapse, and the literature suggests that patients with inv(16) fare differently from those with t(8;21). We retrospectively analyzed 537 patients with CBF-AML, focusing on additional cytogenetic aberrations to examine their impact on clinical outcomes. Trisomies of chromosomes 8, 21, or 22 were significantly more common in patients with inv(16)/t(16;16): 16% vs 7%, 6% vs 0%, and 17% vs 0%, respectively. In contrast, del(9q) and loss of a sex chromosome were more frequent in patients with t(8;21): 15% vs 0.4% for del(9q), 37% vs 0% for loss of X in females, and 44% vs 5% for loss of Y in males. Hyperdiploidy was more frequent in patients with inv(16) (25% vs 9%, whereas hypodiploidy was more frequent in patients with t(8;21) (37% vs 3%. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for age, white blood counts at diagnosis, and KIT mutation status), trisomy 8 was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in inv(16), whereas the presence of other chromosomal abnormalities (not trisomy 8) was associated with decreased OS. In patients with t(8;21), hypodiploidy was associated with improved disease-free survival; hyperdiploidy and del(9q) were associated with improved OS. KIT mutation (either positive or not tested, compared with negative) conferred poor prognoses in univariate analysis only in patients with t(8;21).