Silverberg, J I

AbstractBackgroundThe potential association of long‐term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use with adverse events (AEs) in patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP) is not well characterized in a real‐world setting.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of OCS use and treatment duration on the incident AEs in patients with BP.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims and patient enrollment data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus from 2006−2021. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of BP between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2020 (≥2 claims for BP ≥ 30 days apart). Patients in the OCS cohort also had a claim for OCS use, ≥7.5 mg daily dose of prednisone or equivalent, and no claims for a nonoral systemic corticosteroid (CS) at any time during the study period. A control cohort of patients with BP not using OCS was also selected. Relative risk ratios were estimated between the incidence of AEs in OCS users with different exposure durations (short‐term, <30 days; medium‐term, 30−90 days; long‐term, >90 days) and nonusers by Poisson regression, after adjusting for age, sex, prior drug use, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score within the follow‐up period.ResultsAt the 1‐year follow‐up, long‐term OCS users had a higher incidence of infections, cataract, osteoporosis, heart failure, depression or anxiety, and diabetes compared with OCS nonusers (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with nonusers, long‐term users had increased 1‐year risks (risk ratio; 95% confidence interval) for heart failure (2.27; 1.50−3.44), diabetes (2.05; 1.30−3.24), osteoporosis (1.72; 1.23−2.41), and infection (1.50; 1.13−1.99). Long‐term OCS users also had increased 1‐year risks for heart failure (2.00; 1.21−3.28) and osteoporosis (1.70; 1.16−2.50) compared with short‐term OCS users.ConclusionsLong‐term OCS use (≥7.5 mg) in patients with BP was associated with an increased risk of AEs. Study findings demonstrate a need for steroid‐sparing options with an improved safety profile.

AbstractBackgroundNemolizumab is a humanized anti‐IL‐31 receptor blocker in phase 3 for atopic dermatitis (AD).ObjectiveAnalyse onset of action of nemolizumab 30 mg and compare efficacy and safety vs placebo (SC q4wk plus loading dose) in moderate‐to‐severe AD.MethodsPost hoc analysis of patients with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores ≥ 16 from a phase 2b trial of moderate‐to‐severe AD. Endpoints were change in EASI score at week 16, peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP‐NRS), Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), changes in sleep and responders with ≥ 4‐point improvement on PP‐NRS.ResultsThere was a significantly greater itch relief apparent by Day 2 (−22.8% vs –12.3% PP‐NRS; P = 0.005) which continued to improve through week 16 (−68.5% vs −30.9% PP‐NRS; P < 0.001). At week 16, PP‐NRS ≥ 4‐point response of itch was observed in 68.0% nemolizumab vs 15.9% placebo patients (P ≤ 0.001). There was also a rapid improvement of sleep disturbance with nemolizumab 30 mg, with a significant separation from placebo by Day 3 (−26.6% vs –9.0%; P < 0.001) which further improved till week 16 (−76.0% vs −36.5%; P < 0.001). Also for the EASI score a separation between groups in favour of nemolizumab was observed by week 1 (P ≤ 0.001), which increased through week 16 (−68.6% vs. −42.6%; P = 0.002). Finally, the degree of response was greater in nemolizumab‐treated patients; clinically relevant reductions of 75% EASI were observed in 50.0% of nemolizumab patients versus 15.9% of placebo patients, while 90% reductions were reported for 36.0% and 6.8% of patients, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). IGA success (score of 0/1) was 32.0% for nemolizumab vs 6.8% for placebo (P = 0.002).Nemolizumab was safe and well‐tolerated in this population; nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common adverse events.ConclusionsNemolizumab resulted in very rapid, sustained improvements of inflammation, pruritus and sleep in patients with EASI ≥ 16 at baseline.