Back to Authors

Clouston, Sean A P

0000-0002-6124-0329

Mayo Clinic

Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

Citations 2

A Workshop on Cognitive Aging and Impairment in the 9/11-Exposed Population
Daniels, Robert D. , Clouston, Sean , Hall, Charles B. , Anderson, Kristi , Bennett, David A. , Bromet, Evelyn J. , Calvert, Geoffrey M. , Carreón, Tania , Diminich, Erica D. , Kreisl, William Charles, Kritikos, Minos , Kubale, Travis L. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Peskind, Elaine R. , Raskind, Murray A. , Richards, Marcus , Sano, Mary , Santiago‐Colón, Albeliz , Sloan, Richard P. , Spiro, Avron , Vasdev, Neil , Reissman, Dori B. , Clouston, Sean A P , Anderson, Kristi R , Kritikos, Minos , Mielke, Michelle M , Santiago-Colón, Albeliz , Spiro, Avron , Vasdev, Neil , Bennett, David A. , DeKosky, Steven T. , Finch, Caleb E. , Gandy, Sam , Luft, Benjamin J.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | January 14, 2021 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 681

10.3390/ijerph18020681 Get It

The terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 potentially exposed more than 400,000 responders, workers, and residents to psychological and physical stressors, and numerous hazardous pollutants. In 2011, the World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP) was mandated to monitor and treat persons with 9/11-related adverse health conditions and conduct research on physical and mental health conditions related to the attacks. Emerging evidence suggests that persons exposed to 9/11 may be at increased risk of developing mild cognitive impairment. To investigate further, the WTCHP convened a scientific workshop that examined the natural history of cognitive aging and impairment, biomarkers in the pathway of neurodegenerative diseases, the neuropathological changes associated with hazardous exposures, and the evidence of cognitive decline and impairment in the 9/11-exposed population. Invited participants included scientists actively involved in health-effects research of 9/11-exposed persons and other at-risk populations. Attendees shared relevant research results from their respective programs and discussed several options for enhancements to research and surveillance activities, including the development of a multi-institutional collaborative research network. The goal of this report is to outline the meeting’s agenda and provide an overview of the presentation materials and group discussion.
Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance
Belleville, Sylvie , Cantilon, Marc, Chételat, Gaël , Ewers, Michael , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Kempermann, Gerd , Okonkwo, Ozioma C. , Scarmeas, Nikolaos , Soldan, Anja , Udeh‐Momoh, Chinedu , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Vuoksimaa, Eero , Workgroup, and the Reserve, Resilience and Protective Factors PIA Empirical Definitions and Conceptual Frameworks, Lim, Yen Ying , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Morbelli, Silvia , Clouston, Sean , Martínez‐Lage, Pablo , Arenaza-Urquijo, Eider M, Vemuri, Prashanthi , Clouston, Sean A P , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Stern, Yaakov , Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M. , Bartrés‐Faz, David , Kremen, William S. , Valenzuela, Michael , Workgroup, and the Reserve, Resilience and Protective Factors PIA Empirical Definitions and Conceptual Frameworks

Alzheimer's & Dementia | September 15, 2018 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1305-1311

10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219 Get It

Abstract Several concepts, which in the aggregate get might be used to account for “resilience” against age‐ and disease‐related changes, have been the subject of much research. These include brain reserve, cognitive reserve, and brain maintenance. However, different investigators have use these terms in different ways, and there has never been an attempt to arrive at consensus on the definition of these concepts. Furthermore, there has been confusion regarding the measurement of these constructs and the appropriate ways to apply them to research. Therefore the reserve, resilience, and protective factors professional interest area, established under the auspices of the Alzheimer's Association, established a whitepaper workgroup to develop consensus definitions for cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. The workgroup also evaluated measures that have been used to implement these concepts in research settings and developed guidelines for research that explores or utilizes these concepts. The workgroup hopes that this whitepaper will form a reference point for researchers in this area and facilitate research by supplying a common language.