Back to Authors

Hoellerbauer, Pia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-5575

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University

Citations 1

inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia with non–type A CBFB-MYH11 fusions associate with distinct clinical and genetic features and lack KIT mutations
Schwind, Sebastian , Edwards, Colin G., Mrózek, Krzysztof , Maharry, Kati , Wu, Yue-Zhong, Paschka, Peter , Eisfeld, Ann‐Kathrin , Hoellerbauer, Pia , Becker, Heiko , Metzeler, Klaus H. , Curfman, John, Kohlschmidt, Jessica, Prior, Thomas W., Kolitz, Jonathan E. , Blum, William , Pettenati, Mark J., Cin, Paola Dal , Carroll, Andrew J. , Larson, Richard A. , Volinia, Stefano , Marcucci, Guido , Bloomfield, Clara D. , Nicolet, Deedra , Caligiuri, Michael A. , Larson, Richard A

Blood | November 17, 2012 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 385-391

10.1182/blood-2012-07-442772 Get It

Abstract The inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) in acute myeloid leukemia results in multiple CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts, with type A being most frequent. The biologic and prognostic implications of different fusions are unclear. We analyzed CBFB-MYH11 fusion types in 208 inv(16)/t(16;16) patients with de novo disease, and compared clinical and cytogenetic features and the KIT mutation status between type A (n = 182; 87%) and non–type A (n = 26; 13%) patients. At diagnosis, non–type A patients had lower white blood counts (P = .007), and more often trisomies of chromosomes 8 (P = .01) and 21 (P < .001) and less often trisomy 22 (P = .02). No patient with non–type A fusion carried a KIT mutation, whereas 27% of type A patients did (P = .002). Among the latter, KIT mutations conferred adverse prognosis; clinical outcomes of non–type A and type A patients with wild-type KIT were similar. We also derived a fusion-type–associated global gene-expression profile. Gene Ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes revealed—among others—an enrichment of up-regulated genes involved in activation of caspase activity, cell differentiation and cell cycle control in non–type A patients. We conclude that non–type A fusions associate with distinctclinical and genetic features, including lack of KIT mutations, and a unique gene-expression profile.