Back to Authors

Husmann, Douglas A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-9948

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 91

Editorial Comment
Husmann, Douglas A. , Husmann, Douglas

Journal of Urology | November 15, 2013 | Volume: 191 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 450-450

10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.121 Get It

Ultrasound bladder vibrometry for evaluation of bladder compliance: Preliminary in vivo results
Nenadic, Ivan , Greenleaf, James F. , Husmann, Douglas A. , Mynderse, Lance A. , Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad , Urban, Matthew W. , Alizad, Azra , Fatemi, Mostafa

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | November 1, 2013 | Volume: 134 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: 4011-4011

10.1121/1.4830635 Get It

Bladder compliance is defined as bladder’s ability to expand in volume without a significant change in pressure. The bladder wall is a multi-layered structure including a muscular layer and fibrous connective tissue. As the percent of connective tissue in the bladder interstitium increases compared to smooth muscle, the bladder becomes more rigid and less capable of expanding during filling. Currently, urodynamic studies (UDS) are considered as the clinical gold standard for bladder compliance assessment. This procedure is invasive and is associated with patient discomfort and is expensive. Ultrasound bladder vibrometry (UBV) is a novel acoustic-radiation-forced-based method for noninvasive assessment of bladder compliance. In UBV, an impulsive acoustic radiation force is focused on the bladder wall (under B-mode ultrasound image guidance) to induce vibrations which may be modeled by as a Lamb wave. High frame rate ultrasound is then utilized to detect the induced waves. This wave motion is then used to estimate the viscoelastic properties and the compliance of the bladder wall. Our results reveal a remarkable agreement between UBV and UDS cystometry measures, suggesting the potential of UBV as a viable clinical tool for the assessment of bladder compliance.
Population‐based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi‐ureretic junction obstruction
Knoedler, John, Han, Leona C., Granberg, Candace F. , Kramer, Stephen A., Chow, George C., Gettman, Matthew T., Kimball, Brittany , Moriarty, James P. , Husmann, Douglas A. , Kim, Simon , Kimball, Brittany C

BJU International | March 19, 2013 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1141-1147

10.1111/bju.12039 Get It

Objective To describe the extent of use and in‐hospital outcomes of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for paediatric pelvi‐ureteric junction ( PUJ ) obstruction in the USA . Patients and Methods Using the 2004–2008 N ationwide I npatient S ample, we identified 4590 paediatric patients (≤18 years old) who underwent open or laparoscopic pyeloplasty for PUJ obstruction at 195 hospitals. Multivariable regression models were used to test the associations between hospital and patient covariates (age, gender, race, primary health insurance), type of admission (emergent vs elective), and hospital characteristics (teaching vs non‐teaching status; rural vs urban location) with complications, length of stay ( LOS ), and total hospitalization costs. Results During the 5‐year study interval, 4426 (96.4%) and 164 (3.6%) paediatric patients diagnosed with PUJ obstruction underwent open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty gradually increased from 2.4% in 2004 to 4.4% in 2008, but this increase was not significant ( P = 0.22 for trend). On multivariable analysis, laparoscopic pyeloplasty was observed to have rates of postoperative complications (2.51 vs 5.00; P = 0.67), LOS (2.42 vs 2.75; P = 0.33) and total hospitalization cost ($9755 vs $8537; P = 0.24) similar to those of open pyeloplasty. Conclusions While laparoscopic pyeloplasty was generally an infrequent operation performed for paediatric PUJ obstruction during the period studied, this minimally invasive surgery provided similar outcomes in terms of in‐hospital complications, LOS and total hospitalization costs. The results of this study inform policymakers about the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty.
Febrile Urinary Tract Infections After Ureteroneocystostomy and Subureteral Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid for Vesicoureteral Reflux—Do Choice of Procedure and Success Matter?
Dwyer, Moira , Husmann, Douglas A. , RATHBUN, SUZANNE R., Weight, Christopher , Kramer, Stephen A.

Journal of Urology | November 19, 2012 | Volume: 189 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 275-282

10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.011 Get It

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Value of ultrasound in evaluation of infants with first urinary tract infection.
Husmann, Douglas A.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | August 21, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.3061958.2801055 Get It

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Molecular screening for bladder cancer: progress and potential.
Husmann, Douglas A.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | August 21, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.5895956.5886054 Get It

Annual Endoscopy and Urine Cytology for the Surveillance of Bladder Tumors After Enterocystoplasty for Congenital Bladder Anomalies
Higuchi, Ty, Fox, Janelle , Husmann, Douglas A.

Journal of Urology | September 26, 2011 | Volume: 186 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1791-1795

10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.028 Get It

Editorial Comment
Husmann, Douglas A.

Journal of Urology | September 9, 2011 | Volume: 186 | Issue: 4S | Pages: 1589-1589

10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.129 Get It

Augmentation Cystoplasty and Risk of Neoplasia: Fact, Fiction and Controversy
Higuchi, Ty, Granberg, Candace F. , Fox, Janelle , Husmann, Douglas A.

Journal of Urology | October 19, 2010 | Volume: 184 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2492-2497

10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.038 Get It

Should Male Gender Assignment be Considered in the Markedly Virilized Patient With 46,XX and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia?
Lee, Peter A. , Houk, Christopher P., Husmann, Douglas A.

Journal of Urology | August 22, 2010 | Volume: 184 | Issue: 4S | Pages: 1786-1792

10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.116 Get It