Back to Authors

Herrmann, Joerg

0000-0001-6675-4559

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 12

Cardiotoxicity from Capecitabine Chemotherapy: Prospective Study of Incidence at Rest and During Physical Exercise
Lestuzzi, Chiara , Tartuferi, Lucia, Viel, E, Angelis, Giulia De , Lonardi, Sara , Innocente, R. , Herrmann, Joerg , Bidoli, Ettore , Lonardi, Sara , Bergamo, Francesca , Guglielmi, Alessandra , Sinagra, Gianfranco , Herrmann, Joerg , Stolfo, Davide , Paoli, Antonino De , Banzato, Alberto , Buonadonna, Angela , Berretta, Massimiliano , Bergamo, Francesca

The Oncologist | January 14, 2022 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e158-e167

10.1093/oncolo/oyab035 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPhysical activity may increase the risk of cardiotoxicity (myocardial ischemia, major arrhythmias) of 5-Fluorouracil, but this risk has never been investigated for its prodrug capecitabine.Patients and MethodsOne hundred and ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing capecitabine chemotherapy from December 1, 2010 through July 31, 2016 were prospectively evaluated. The baseline evaluation included electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (2DE); a follow-up evaluation, including ECG and exercise stress testing (2DE in case of ECG abnormalities), was done after ≥10 days of treatment. Cardiotoxicity was suspected from ischemic ECG changes, new kinetic abnormalities at 2DE, Lown classification ≥2 ventricular arrhythmia, symptomatic arrhythmias, or positive stress test, and confirmed by a negative stress test after capecitabine washout.ResultsCardiotoxicity was diagnosed in 32 patients (16.7%): six at rest and 26 during exercise. All 32 patients had ECG abnormalities: ST-segment changes (24 patients), negative T-waves (2) and/or arrhythmias: ventricular arrhythmias (14 cases), supraventricular tachycardia (2), complete heart block (1). Eight patients had typical symptoms, 6 had atypical symptoms, 1 had syncope, 17 (53%) were asymptomatic. Cardiotoxicity was more common in patients with atypical symptoms during daily life (OR = 15.7) and in those on a therapeutic schedule of 5 days/week (OR = 9.44).ConclusionCapecitabine cardiotoxicity is frequent, and often elicited by physical effort. Oncologists, cardiologists, and general practitioners should be aware of this risk. Active cardiotoxicity surveillance with ECG (and echocardiogram and/or stress testing in suspected cases) during therapy is recommended.Clinical Trials registration numberCRO-2010-17.
Cardio‐oncology care in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic: An International Cardio‐Oncology Society (ICOS) statement
Carver, Joseph R. , Porter, Charles , Liu, Jennifer E. , Mitchell, Joshua D. , Fradley, Michael G. , Pusic, Iskra , Stockerl‐Goldstein, Keith , Ganatra, Sarju , O’Quinn, Rupal , Minotti, Giorgio , Szmit, Sebastian , Alvarez‐Cardona, Jose, Curigliano, Giuseppe , Neilan, Tomas G. , Herrmann, Joerg , Herrmann, Joerg , Curigliano, Giuseppe , Mitchell, Joshua D , Minotti, Giorgio , Lenihan, Daniel , Dent, Susan , Thavendiranathan, Paaladinesh , Nohria, Anju , Blaes, Anne , Lyon, Alexander R. , López‐Fernández, Teresa , Cardinale, Daniela , Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | September 11, 2020 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 480-504

10.3322/caac.21635 Get It

Abstract The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV‐2) has given rise to a pandemic of unprecedented proportions in the modern era because of its highly contagious nature and impact on human health and society: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and established CV disease (CVD) are among those initially identified at the highest risk for serious complications, including death. Subsequent studies have pointed out that patients with cancer are also at high risk for a critical disease course. Therefore, the most vulnerable patients are seemingly those with both cancer and CVD, and a careful, unified approach in the evaluation and management of this patient population is especially needed in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of the unique implications of the viral outbreak for the field of cardio‐oncology and outlines key modifications in the approach to this ever‐increasing patient population. These modifications include a shift toward greater utilization of cardiac biomarkers and a more focused CV imaging approach in the broader context of modifications to typical practice pathways. The goal of this strategic adjustment is to minimize the risk of SARS–CoV‐2 infection (or other future viral outbreaks) while not becoming negligent of CVD and its important impact on the overall outcomes of patients who are being treated for cancer.