Field, John K

Abstract Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract To clarify the role of previous lung diseases (PLDs) (chronic bronchitis, emphysema, pneumonia, tuberculosis, asbestosis and silicosis) in the development of lung cancer we conducted a pooled analysis in the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO). Data from 16 studies (9 population based case-control, 4 hospital based case-control, 2 mixed case-control and 1 cohort - 10 from North America, 5 from Europe and 1 from Asia) were pooled, including 24044 cases and 81256 controls. Study-specific effect estimates were derived using logistic regression models for case-control studies and Cox proportional hazards models for cohort studies adjusted for age, sex, education and pack-years of smoking. Effect estimates were then pooled using random effects models where summary effects for each of the PLDs were evaluated separately. Stratified analyses were conducted based on smoking status, histology and study design or control source. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochrane Q statistic and Galbraith plots, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots as well as the Begg test. A previous history of emphysema conferred a relative risk (RR) of 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67-2.82 (from 15 studies, p-het<.001). A previous history of chronic bronchitis conferred a RR of 1.49, 95% CI: 1.33-1.60 (from 12 studies, p-het.=0.434). Tuberculosis was associated with a RR of 1.54, 95% CI: 1.19-1.99 (from 15 studies, p-het.=0.001). Both asbestosis (RR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.53-4.12 (from 7 studies, p-het=0.379)) and silicosis (RR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.15-2.54, (from 3 studies, p-het. p=0.476)) were also associated with lung cancer risk. When the outlying studies were removed, effect estimates changed minimally and heterogeneity was reduced. Findings were consistent in subgroup analyses by smoking status and histology (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer). Effect estimates among never smokers were for emphysema a RR of 2.21, 95% CI: 0.99-4.90 (from 8 studies), for chronic bronchitis 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78-1.62 (from 9 studies), for pneumonia 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70 (from 10 studies) and for tuberculosis 1.54, 95% CI: 0.99-2.39 (from 9 studies). In this analysis of data from multiple continents, PLDs were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The evidence among never smokers supports a direct relationship between previous lung diseases and lung cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4826.

Abstract Background: The International Lung Cancer Consortium was established in 2004. To clarify the role of DNA repair genes in lung cancer susceptibility, we conducted a pooled analysis of genetic variants in DNA repair pathways, whose associations have been investigated by at least 3 individual studies. Methods: Data from 14 studies were pooled for 18 sequence variants in 12 DNA repair genes, including APEX1, OGG1, XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, ERCC1, XPD, XPF, XPG, XPA, MGMT, and TP53. The total number of subjects included in the analysis for each variant ranged from 2,073 to 13,955 subjects. Results: Four of the variants were found to be weakly associated with lung cancer risk with borderline significance: these were XRCC3 T241M [heterozygote odds ratio (OR), 0.89; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.79-0.99 and homozygote OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-1.00] based on 3,467 cases and 5,021 controls from 8 studies, XPD K751Q (heterozygote OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.10 and homozygote OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39) based on 6,463 cases and 6,603 controls from 9 studies, and TP53 R72P (heterozygote OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.29 and homozygote OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42) based on 3,610 cases and 5,293 controls from 6 studies. OGG1 S326C homozygote was suggested to be associated with lung cancer risk in Caucasians (homozygote OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.79) based on 2,569 cases and 4,178 controls from 4 studies but not in Asians. The other 14 variants did not exhibit main effects on lung cancer risk. Discussion: In addition to data pooling, future priorities of International Lung Cancer Consortium include coordinated genotyping and multistage validation for ongoing genome-wide association studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(11):3081–9)