Baffour, Francis I

AbstractWith rapid advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), imaging has become instrumental in detection of intramedullary and extramedullary disease, providing prognostic information, and assessing therapeutic efficacy. Whole‐body low dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) has emerged as the study of choice to detect osteolytic bone disease. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) combines functional and morphologic information to identify MM disease activity and assess treatment response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has excellent soft‐tissue contrast and is the modality of choice for bone marrow evaluation. This review focuses on the imaging modalities available for MM patient management, highlighting advantages, disadvantages, and applications of each.

Purpose The stiffness of a myocardial infarct affects the left ventricular pump function and remodeling. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive imaging technique for measuring soft‐tissue stiffness in vivo. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of assessing in vivo regional myocardial stiffness with high‐frequency 3D cardiac MRE in a porcine model of myocardial infarction, and compare the results with ex vivo uniaxial tensile testing. Methods Myocardial infarct was induced in a porcine model by embolizing the left circumflex artery. Fourteen days postinfarction, MRE imaging was performed in diastole using an echocardiogram‐gated spin‐echo echo‐planar‐imaging sequence with 140‐Hz vibrations and 3D MRE processing. The MRE stiffness and tensile modulus from uniaxial testing were compared between the remote and infarcted myocardium. Results Myocardial infarcts showed increased in vivo MRE stiffness compared with remote myocardium (4.6 ± 0.7 kPa versus 3.0 ± 0.6 kPa, P = 0.02) within the same pig. Ex vivo uniaxial mechanical testing confirmed the in vivo MRE results, showing that myocardial infarcts were stiffer than remote myocardium (650 ± 80 kPa versus 110 ± 20 kPa, P = 0.01). Conclusions These results demonstrate the feasibility of assessing in vivo regional myocardial stiffness with high‐frequency 3D cardiac MRE. Magn Reson Med 79:361–369, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

PurposeTo evaluate if cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can measure increased stiffness in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Myocardial tissue stiffness plays an important role in cardiac function. A noninvasive quantitative imaging technique capable of measuring myocardial stiffness could aid in disease diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and disease prognostic strategies. We recently developed a high‐frequency cardiac MRE technique capable of making noninvasive stiffness measurements.Materials and MethodsIn all, 16 volunteers and 22 patients with cardiac amyloidosis were enrolled in this study after Institutional Review Board approval and obtaining formal written consent. All subjects were imaged head‐first in the supine position in a 1.5T closed‐bore MR imager. 3D MRE was performed using 5 mm isotropic resolution oblique short‐axis slices and a vibration frequency of 140 Hz to obtain global quantitativein vivoleft ventricular stiffness measurements. The median stiffness was compared between the two cohorts. An octahedral shear strain signal‐to‐noise ratio (OSS‐SNR) threshold of 1.17 was used to exclude exams with insufficient motion amplitude.ResultsFive volunteers and six patients had to be excluded from the study because they fell below the 1.17 OSS‐SNR threshold. The myocardial stiffness of cardiac amyloid patients (median: 11.4 kPa, min: 9.2, max: 15.7) was significantly higher (P = 0.0008) than normal controls (median: 8.2 kPa, min: 7.2, max: 11.8).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of 3D high‐frequency cardiac MRE as a contrast‐agent‐free diagnostic imaging technique for cardiac amyloidosis.Level of Evidence:2Technical Efficacy:Stage 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1361–1367.