Hurtz, Christian

CD25 is a subunit of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Acute leukemias with oncogenic tyrosine kinases often include CD25 + leukemia subpopulations, which portend poor clinical outcomes for patients; however, acute leukemia cells do not respond to IL-2. Here, we identified CD25 and its phosphorylation by protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) as central elements of a feedback loop that stabilized fluctuations in oncogenic tyrosine kinase signaling in acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemia. Genetic ablation of CD25 in murine and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of acute leukemias reduced clonal fitness, colony formation, and leukemia-initiation capacity in serial transplant recipients. Oncogenic tyrosine kinase signaling in leukemia cells stimulated NF-κB–mediated CD25 expression, whereas PKCδ-mediated phosphorylation of CD25 suppressed oncogenic tyrosine kinase signaling through inhibitory phosphatases, such as PTPN6. Interactome analyses and mass spectrometry–based global phosphoproteomic analyses showed that CD25 deletion abolished the phosphatase activity of PTPN6, resulting in enhanced activation of tyrosine kinases and NF-κB. Four injections of a CD25 antibody-drug conjugate induced complete remission in mice transplanted with PDX refractory leukemia. These findings highlight the dependency of tyrosine kinase–driven leukemias on robust feedback control and the role of PKCδ and CD25 in assembling its components.

Abstract Genetic lesions such as BCR–ABL1, E2A–PBX1, and MLL rearrangements (MLLr) are associated with unfavorable outcomes in adult B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Leukemia oncoproteins may directly or indirectly disrupt cytosine methylation patterning to mediate the malignant phenotype. We postulated that DNA methylation signatures in these aggressive B-ALLs would point toward disease mechanisms and useful biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We therefore conducted DNA methylation and gene expression profiling on a cohort of 215 adult patients with B-ALL enrolled in a single phase III clinical trial (ECOG E2993) and normal control B cells. In BCR–ABL1-positive B-ALLs, aberrant cytosine methylation patterning centered around a cytokine network defined by hypomethylation and overexpression of IL2RA(CD25). The E2993 trial clinical data showed that CD25 expression was strongly associated with a poor outcome in patients with ALL regardless of BCR–ABL1 status, suggesting CD25 as a novel prognostic biomarker for risk stratification in B-ALLs. In E2A–PBX1-positive B-ALLs, aberrant DNA methylation patterning was strongly associated with direct fusion protein binding as shown by the E2A–PBX1 chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing (ChIP-seq), suggesting that E2A–PBX1 fusion protein directly remodels the epigenome to impose an aggressive B-ALL phenotype. MLLr B-ALL featured prominent cytosine hypomethylation, which was linked with MLL fusion protein binding, H3K79 dimethylation, and transcriptional upregulation, affecting a set of known and newly identified MLL fusion direct targets with oncogenic activity such as FLT3 and BCL6. Notably, BCL6 blockade or loss of function suppressed proliferation and survival of MLLr leukemia cells, suggesting BCL6-targeted therapy as a new therapeutic strategy for MLLr B-ALLs. Significance: We conducted the first integrative epigenomic study in adult B-ALLs, as a correlative study to the ECOG E2993 phase III clinical trial. This study links for the first time the direct actions of oncogenic fusion proteins with disruption of epigenetic regulation mediated by cytosine methylation. We identify a novel clinically actionable biomarker in B-ALLs: IL2RA(CD25), which is linked with BCR–ABL1 and an inflammatory signaling network associated with chemotherapy resistance. We show that BCL6 is a novel MLL fusion protein target that is required to maintain the proliferation and survival of primary human adult MLLr cells and provide the basis for a clinical trial with BCL6 inhibitors for patients with MLLr. Cancer Discov; 2(11); 1004–23. ©2012 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Cimmino and Aifantis, p. 976. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 961