Santos-Santillana, Karla

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index values during the first trimester of pregnancy in Latin American women.MethodsPregnant women were enrolled at their first prenatal visit at the Obstetric Division in the University Hospital “Dr. José E. González”. Triglycerides and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were collected to determine the TyG index. GDM diagnosis was performed by a single‐step 2‐hour 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test. Generalized linear models were used to determine risk ratios; pregnancy outcomes at delivery were collected from the hospital medical records.ResultsA total of 164 pregnant women were included. GDM was present in 29 (17.7%) women. No significant differences in age, first‐trimester body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), family history of diabetes, and TyG index were observed between GDM cases and the reference group without GDM. The adjusted analysis showed no association between TyG and GDM (risk ratio [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–1.88]). Higher TyG index values between women with and without a diagnosis of GDM in the second trimester were observed. No significant differences were identified in pregnancy outcomes, although a trend was observed for hyperbilirubinemia in women with first‐trimester TyG index values greater than 8.7.ConclusionsOur findings do not support the use of the TyG index for GDM prediction in Latin American women.

Background . Hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia coexist in 30-60% of patients with diabetes. The impact of hypertriglyceridemia regarding HbA1c assay reliability remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a prospective in vivo controlled study with the aim of defining the association between triglyceride levels and HbA1c. Methods . A total of 44 patients with an index-hospital admission diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis or hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis, as a model for acute elevation of triglycerides, were recruited. Blood samples were drawn for the measurement of HbA1c, triglycerides, glucose, and hemoglobin at baseline and subsequently 24 and 48 hours after admission. HbA1c analysis was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography Bio-Rad D10 (NGSP approved). Results . All patients completed the study protocol. A difference between mean triglycerides from day 0 (baseline) to day 2 of 1567.2 mg/dL was observed. We found a difference between mean serum HbA1c from days 0 to 2 of 0.09% [1 mmol/mol] ( p = 0.004 ). Moreover, a weak correlation between the mean difference of HbA1c and triglycerides from baseline to day 2 was found to be statistically significant ( r = 0.256 , p = 0.015 ). None of these findings, however, are clinically significant. Conclusion . Triglycerides do not impair the interpretation of HbA1c assay. Patients and clinicians can now be confident that hypertriglyceridemia is not an important factor when interpreting HbA1c results.