Back to Authors

Elliott, Daniel S.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-8805

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 50

Can time to failure predict the faulty component in artificial urinary sphincter device malfunctions?
Yang, David Y. , Linder, Brian J. , Miller, Adam R. , Rangel, Laureano J. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Yang Md, David , Linder, Brian J

International Journal of Urology | November 26, 2017 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 146-150

10.1111/iju.13485 Get It

ObjectiveArtificial urinary sphincter malfunctions can occur in any of the individual components. Preoperative identification of the malfunctioning component can be valuable for patient counseling and surgical planning. The optimal strategy for repair of failed artificial urinary sphincter components is debated given the relative rarity of the situation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of time to failure with failed artificial urinary sphincter component and to compare our outcomes of specific component versus complete device replacement.MethodsFrom 1983 to 2011, 1805 artificial urinary sphincter procedures were carried out at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota, USA), of which 1072 patients underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter placement. Clinical variables, including time to failure, were evaluated for association with component failure. Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate the differences in time to reach a fixed percentage of component failure.ResultsA total of 115 patients experienced device failure at a median follow up of 4.2 years. Urethral cuff, abdominal reservoir, scrotal pump and tubing malfunction occurred in 53 (4.9%), 26 (2.4%), 11 (1%) and 25 (2.3%) patients, respectively. Increasing age at the time of primary surgery was protective of cuff malfunction (hazard ratio 0.97, P = 0.04). Time to 3% urethral cuff failure outpaced other component failures (P < 0.05). Secondary failure‐free rates after whole device versus specific component revisions were comparable (P = 0.38).ConclusionsClinical predictors for artificial urinary sphincter failure continue to be difficult to establish. Although single component versus entire device replacement have similar outcomes, if pursuing single component revision, we recommend cuff‐first interrogation in devices in place for >3 years, as this represents the most likely component to fail.
Can Urodynamic Parameters Predict Sling Revision for Voiding Dysfunction in Women Undergoing Synthetic Midurethral Sling Placement?
Linder, Brian J. , Trabuco, Emanuel C. , Gebhart, John B. , Klingele, Christopher J., Occhino, John A. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Lightner, Deborah J., Linder, Brian J

Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery | November 14, 2017 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 63-66

10.1097/spv.0000000000000521 Get It

Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of urodynamic studies performed before primary midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence in predicting the need for subsequent sling release for voiding dysfunction. Methods The health records of women managed with primary synthetic midurethral sling placement at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2012, were reviewed. The primary outcome was surgical sling release for postoperative voiding dysfunction (ie, prolonged retention, elevated postvoid residual volumes with new voiding symptoms, or de novo onset or worsening of overactive bladder symptoms). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between potential clinical risk factors and the primary outcome. Results Overall, 1629 women underwent primary synthetic midurethral sling placement during the study time frame, including 1081 patients (66%) who underwent a preoperative multichannel urodynamic evaluation. A sling release for voiding dysfunction was performed for 51 patients (3.1%) at a median of 1.9 months postoperatively (interquartile range, 1.3–9.3 months). Patients undergoing sling release were significantly more likely to have had retropubic sling placement (P = 0.003) and concomitant prolapse surgery (P = 0.005). On univariate analysis, no urodynamic parameters were associated with the risk of sling release; evaluated parameters included peak flow rate (P = 0.20), postvoid residual volume (P = 0.37), voiding without detrusor contraction (P = 0.96), and detrusor pressure at maximal flow (P = 0.23). Conclusions Sling release for voiding dysfunction was rare in our cohort. No urodynamic parameters were associated with the risk of sling release.
Metastatic Testicular Choriocarcinoma and Secondary Hyperthyroidism: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Gleason, Philip E., Elliott, Daniel S. , Zimmerman, Donald, Smithson, William A., Kramer, Stephen A.

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1063-1064

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35183-2 Get It

The impact of incontinence etiology on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes
Miller, Adam R. , Linder, Brian J. , Rangel, Laureano J. , Yang, David Y. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Yang Md, David , Linder, Brian J

Investigative and Clinical Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 241

10.4111/icu.2017.58.4.241 Get It

Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival
Blackburne, Andrew T. , Linder, Brian J. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Linder, Brian J

Scandinavian Journal of Urology | June 5, 2017 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 339-341

10.1080/21681805.2017.1322634 Get It

Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement
Linder, Brian J. , Viers, Boyd R. , Ziegelmann, Matthew , Rivera, Marcelino , Elliott, Daniel S. , Ziegelmann, Matthew J, Rivera, Marcelino E, Linder, Brian J , Viers, Boyd R

International braz j urol | April 17, 2017 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 264-270

10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0240 Get It

Effects of Smoking Status on Device Survival Among Individuals Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement
Godwin, Christina, Linder, Brian J. , Rivera, Marcelino , Ziegelmann, Matthew , Elliott, Daniel S. , Godwin, Christina A, Rivera, Marcelino E, Ziegelmann, Matthew J, Linder, Brian J

American Journal of Men's Health | May 30, 2016 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1398-1402

10.1177/1557988316651133 Get It

Smoking is an established risk factor for wound complications. There is limited data on the impact of smoking on artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess AUS device survival outcomes based on smoking status. From 1985 to 2014, 1,270 patients underwent AUS placement with 728 having smoking status available for review. Smoking status was categorized as never, prior, and active smokers. Kaplan−Meier analysis was performed to evaluate differences in survival, including overall device and erosion/infection−free survival. Hazard regression analysis was utilized to determine the association between smoking and device outcomes. Of the 728 patients in the study, 401 had a history of smoking with 41 active smokers and 360 never smokers at the time of AUS implant. When compared with nonsmokers, past smokers had a higher rate of hypertension and prior transient ischemic attack. Clinical comorbidities were similar between nonsmokers and active smokers. On univariate analysis, patient age, history of transient ischemic attack, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were significantly associated with infection/erosion rate, but prior or active smoking statuses were not. Likewise, when comparing smokers (past or active) with lifelong nonsmokers, there was no significant difference in 1- and 5-year overall device survival. There was no evidence for adverse AUS outcomes in current or past smokers compared with nonsmokers. Given the established risk of perioperative complications secondary to smoking, the recommendation should still be to counsel patients to quit prior to undergoing AUS placement. External validation of these findings is needed.
Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes among Primary and Secondary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantations in Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence
Viers, Boyd R. , Linder, Brian J. , Rivera, Marcelino , Rangel, Laureano J. , Ziegelmann, Matthew , Elliott, Daniel S. , Rivera, Marcelino E, Ziegelmann, Matthew J, Linder, Brian J , Viers, Boyd R

Journal of Urology | March 17, 2016 | Volume: 196 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 838-843

10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.076 Get It

Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in octogenarians
Ziegelmann, Matthew , Linder, Brian J. , Rivera, Marcelino , Viers, Boyd R. , Rangel, Laureano J. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Ziegelmann, Matthew J, Rivera, Marcelino E, Linder, Brian J , Viers, Boyd R

International Journal of Urology | February 18, 2016 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 419-423

10.1111/iju.13062 Get It

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of patient age on device outcomes among patients undergoing primary artificial urinary sphincter.MethodsA total of 1081 male patients who underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter placement from 1983 to 2011 were analyzed, including 91 men (8%) who were aged >80 years at the time of surgery. Revisions and explanations were compared between men stratified by decade of life. Hazard ratios adjusting for competing risks were used to determine the association with age and artificial urinary sphincter device outcomes (infection/erosion, urethral atrophy and malfunction), while overall device failure was estimated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis.ResultsPatients aged >80 years were more likely to have coronary disease (P = 0.009), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.04), hypertension (P = 0.002) and lower body mass index (P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, patients aged >80 years were significantly more likely to experience device erosion or infection compared with a reference of patients aged <60 years (hazard ratio 4.13; P = 0.046), whereas there was no difference in those patients aged 60–70 years or 70–80 years compared with the reference group (P = 0.56 and 0.45). There was no significant difference in overall device survival between the age‐stratified groups (P = 0.26).ConclusionsAlthough overall artificial urinary sphincter device survival is similar, patients aged >80 years are more likely to experience erosion or infection compared with younger patients. Despite this, the overall device failure rate is low, and artificial urinary sphincter might be considered for appropriately selected and counseled octogenarians.
The Impact of Prior Radiation Therapy on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Device Survival
Rivera, Marcelino , Linder, Brian J. , Ziegelmann, Matthew , Viers, Boyd R. , Rangel, Laureano J. , Elliott, Daniel S. , Rivera, Marcelino E, Ziegelmann, Matthew J, Linder, Brian J , Viers, Boyd R

Journal of Urology | October 30, 2015 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 4 Part 1 | Pages: 1033-1037

10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.119 Get It