Back to Authors

Cabello Arreola, Alejandra

Mayo Clinic

Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 1

Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive modafinil/armodafinil in bipolar depression: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Núñez, Nicolás A. , Singh, Balwinder , Romo‐Nava, Francisco , Joseph, Boney , Cuéllar‐Barboza, Alfredo B. , Cabello-Arreola, Alejandra , Voort, Jennifer L. Vande , Moore, Katherine M. , Frye, Mark A. , Cuellar-Barboza, Alfredo , Cabello Arreola, Alejandra, Vande Voort, Jennifer L., Croarkin, Paul, Biernacka, Joanna , Romo-Nava, F , Singh, Balwinder , Joseph, Boney , Veldić, Marin , Croarkin, Paul E. , Biernacka, Joanna M. , McElroy, Susan L.

Bipolar Disorders | October 23, 2019 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 109-120

10.1111/bdi.12859 Get It

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dopaminergic‐enhancing agent modafinil/armodafinil (MoArm) as adjunctive treatment for bipolar depression. Methods A comprehensive search of major electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adjunctive MoArm that included patients with bipolar I (BP‐I) or bipolar II (BP‐II) depression. Data for response/remission and all‐cause discontinuation were analyzed. Effect size was summarized by relative risk (RR) using a random effect model. Results Of 58 studies, five RCTs (N = 795 drug, N = 792 placebo) met inclusion criteria. Four armodafinil studies included only BP‐I patients and one modafinil study included both bipolar subtypes with limited heterogeneity ( I 2 = 34%, P = .19; I 2 = 18%, P = .30). Compared to placebo, augmentation with MoArm was associated with significantly greater rates of treatment response (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.37; P = .03) and remission (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10‐1.73; P = .005). All‐cause discontinuation was not different than placebo (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89‐1.30; P = .45) with no evidence of increased risk of mood switch or suicide attempts with MoArm (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.39‐2.5; P = .98; RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.37‐2.85; P = .97). Conclusion This narrower scope meta‐analysis of one drug for one disease suggests that adjunctive MoArm may represent a novel therapeutic intervention. Further studies delineating the subtypes of bipolar depression responsive to these novel dopaminergic‐enhancing agents are encouraged.