Back to Authors

Valery, Jose

0000-0003-2671-7854

Mayo Clinic

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Citations 6

Pharmacogenomic augmented machine learning in electronic health record alerts: A health system‐wide usability survey of clinicians
Grant, Caroline W. , Marrero‐Polanco, Jean , Joyce, Jeremiah B. , Barry, Barbara , Stillwell, Ashley , Kruger, Kellie, Anderson, Therese , Talley, Heather Laine, Hedges, Mary S. , Valery, Jose R. , Sharp, Richard R. , Athreya, Arjun P. , Talley, Heather, Hedges, Mary S , Valery, Jose , White, Richard D , Sharp, Richard R , Croarkin, Paul E , Dyrbye, Liselotte N , V Bobo, William , Athreya, Arjun P , Joyce, Jeremiah , Barry, Barbara , Anderson, Therese F , Kruger, Kellie, Talley, Heather, White, Richard D. , Croarkin, Paul E. , Dyrbye, Liselotte N. , Bobo, William V.

Clinical and Translational Science | October 15, 2024 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/cts.70044 Get It

Abstract Pharmacogenomic (PGx) biomarkers integrated using machine learning can be embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) to provide clinicians with individualized predictions of drug treatment outcomes. Currently, however, drug alerts in the EHR are largely generic (not patient‐specific) and contribute to increased clinician stress and burnout. Improving the usability of PGx alerts is an urgent need. Therefore, this work aimed to identify principles for optimal PGx alert design through a health‐system‐wide, mixed‐methods study. Clinicians representing multiple practices and care settings ( N = 1062) in urban, rural, and underserved regions were invited to complete an electronic survey comparing the usability of three drug alerts for citalopram, as a case study. Alert 1 contained a generic warning of pharmacogenomic effects on citalopram metabolism. Alerts 2 and 3 provided patient‐specific predictions of citalopram efficacy with varying depth of information. Primary outcomes included the System's Usability Scale score (0–100 points) of each alert, the perceived impact of each alert on stress and decision‐making, and clinicians' suggestions for alert improvement. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of alert preference by clinician age, practice type, and geographic setting. Qualitative information was captured to provide context to quantitative information. The final cohort comprised 305 geographically and clinically diverse clinicians. A simplified, individualized alert (Alert 2) was perceived as beneficial for decision‐making and stress compared with a more detailed version (Alert 3) and the generic alert (Alert 1) regardless of age, practice type, or geographic setting. Findings emphasize the need for clinician‐guided design of PGx alerts in the era of digital medicine.
Comparison of Migraine Characteristics in Patients With and Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Sileno, Sean, Bi, Yan , Dorenkott, Sean M., Omer, Mohamed , Salih, Ahmed, Ghoz, Hassan , Valery, Jose R. , Harris, Dana M. , Rozen, Todd D. , White, Launia J. , Sileno, Sean M, Ghoz, Hassan M, Stancampiano, Fernando F , Valery, Jose , Harris, Dana M , Heckman, Michael G. , Stancampiano, Fernando F.

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | March 24, 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319231164307 Get It

Background: Survey studies have found an increased prevalence of migraine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the clinical characteristics of migraines in this population are unknown. We conducted a retrospective medical record review study to characterize migraines in the IBD population. Methods: Six hundred seventy-five migraine patients (280 with IBD, 395 without IBD) who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Mayo Clinic Arizona, or Mayo Clinic Florida between July 2009 and March 2021 were included. Patients with ICD codes for migraine and either Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were selected. Electronic health care records were reviewed. Patients confirmed to have IBD and migraine were included. Demographic, IBD, and migraine characteristics were collected. Statistical analysis was completed using SAS. Results: Patients with IBD were less often male (8.6% vs 21.3%, P < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (>2: 24.6% vs 15.7%, P = .003); 54.6% had CD and 39.3% had UC. Patients with IBD had migraine with aura and without aura more frequently ( OR 2.20, P < .001 and OR 2.79, P < .001, respectively) than non-IBD patients. Additionally, those with IBD less commonly had chronic migraine (OR 0.23, P < .001) and less commonly had chronic migraine or treatment for migraine (ORs 0.23-0.55, P ≤ .002). Conclusions: Migraine with and without aura have increased prevalence in IBD patients. Further study of this topic will be helpful to clarify the prevalence of migraine, establish this population’s response to treatment, and better understand the reason(s) for a low rate of treatment.
Assessment of Knowledge Regarding Risks and Benefits of the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants
Valery, Jose R. , Marar, Ahmad, Ward, Cynthia R. , Abdelmoneim, Yousif , Fitzgerald, Patrick , Mwakyanjala, Edson J., Harris, Dana M. , Murray, Loren P., White, Launia J. , Valery, Jose , Ward, Cynthia, Abdelmoneim, Yousif M, Fitzgerald, Patrick J, Mwakyanjala, Edson, Harris, Dana M , Murray, Loren, Stancampiano, Fernando F , Pujalte, George , Ward, Cynthia, Heckman, Michael G. , Stancampiano, Fernando F.

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | August 24, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319221118806 Get It

Background: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have replaced vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants as the first-line treatment option for stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. With VKA therapy, disease and treatment-related knowledge is associated with improved adherence and outcomes. There is concern that due to the lack of need for ongoing visits for laboratory monitoring in patients on NOACs, there is less opportunity for education, leading to poor disease- and treatment-related knowledge in this patient group. Methods: One hundred ninety-nine (199) patients presenting to 2 primary care clinics on NOAC therapy were surveyed regarding atrial fibrillation and their knowledge regarding NOACs. Chart review was completed to determine patient characteristics and data obtained was compared with survey results to determine the accuracy of the survey responses. Results: Patients with a lower degree of NOAC knowledge tended to be older ( P < .001), have higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ( P = .001), use apixaban more often ( P = .008), and have been on NOACs for a shorter time period ( P = .007). Conclusions: There is an opportunity to improve NOAC-related knowledge in patients with atrial fibrillation. When developing educational interventions, patient characteristics associated with poor knowledge should be considered. Based on our results, these are patients who are older, more medically complex, are on apixaban, and have been on NOAC therapy for a shorter duration.
A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season
Applewhite, Andres I. , Manaois, Alyssa N. , Dimuna, John, Glenn, Jada, Brushaber, Danielle , Sher, Taimur , Valery, Jose R. , Applewhite, Andres, Stancampiano, Fernando F , Harris, Dana M. , Manaois, Alyssa, Brushaber, Danielle E, Valery, Jose , Stancampiano, Fernando F. , Heckman, Michael G.

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | September 15, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/2150132720958532 Get It

Introduction: Improving flu vaccination rates in the general population is an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity, mortality, and the cost of seasonal influenza. In order to optimize immunization strategies, factors associated with decreased vaccination rates need to be explored. The literature suggests that there is a gender difference in the rate of influenza vaccination but is limited to population-based survey studies and also is inconsistent as to which gender has a higher rate of vaccination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for a gender-based difference in the rate of influenza vaccination among patients who presented for an annual physical examination during the 2018 to 2019 influenza season. Methods: In this multi-site, retrospective chart review, a total of 1193 patients (608 female and 585 male) who underwent an annual physical examination in April of 2019 were included. Baseline medical information was collected, as well as demographic characteristics and influenza vaccination status. The proportion of patients who underwent influenza vaccination was compared between males and females using multivariable logistic regression models; odds ratios (ORs) were estimated. Results: The likelihood of influenza vaccination was significantly higher in females (62.8%) compared to males (53.2%) in both unadjusted analysis (OR = 1.49, P < .001) and in multivariable analysis adjusting for the potential confounding influences of clinic location, BMI, insurance type, and occupation (OR = 1.42, P = .005). Interestingly, a higher influenza vaccination rate for females compared to males was observed in patients age<60 years (OR = 1.70, P = .025) and between ages 60 and 75 (OR = 1.66, P = .009), but not for patients older than 75 years (OR = 1.12, P = .66). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the rate of influenza vaccination is higher for females than for males who presented for an annual preventive physical exam and who are younger than 75 years old.
A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
Valery, Jose R. , Applewhite, Andres I. , Manaois, Alyssa N. , Dimuna, John, Sher, Taimur , Brushaber, Danielle , Valery, Jose , Applewhite, Andres, Manaois, Alyssa, Brushaber, Danielle E, Stancampiano, Fernando F , Heckman, Michael G. , Stancampiano, Fernando F.

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | June 2, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/2150132720931321 Get It

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, despite being largely preventable and treatable. Improving overall screening rates among both men and women is considered an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity and mortality from CRC. In order to optimize screening strategies, factors associated with decreased compliance need to be understood. This study aimed to compare initial CRC screening rates between males and females in a population of patients who presented for an annual physical examination. Methods: A retrospective chart review study of 380 patients designed to compare rates of initial CRC screening between males and females was conducted. Patients who were seen at our institution for an annual physical examination and were between 51 and 60 years of age were included. Results: There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of initial colon cancer screening between females (83.0%) and males (80.9%) in either unadjusted analysis (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .59) or in multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounding variables (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .61). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the rate of initial CRC screening between males and females who presented for an annual physical examination. This suggests that designing interventions to improve screening specific to gender may not be needed in a population of patients who attend routine preventive health examinations. Further study is needed in the general population to examine for gender-based differences in initial CRC screening among patients who do not regularly follow up for preventive examinations.
Video intervention to improve incident reporting among medical trainees
Valery, Jose R. , Helmi, Haythem, Spaulding, Aaron , Che, Xinxuang, Prada, Gabriel , Chamorro-Pareja, Natalia , Valery, Jose , Moreno-Franco, Pablo, Spaulding, Aaron , Franco, Pablo Moreno , Stancampiano, Fernando F.

BMJ Open Quality | October 1, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e000706

10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000706 Get It

Introduction/objective Improving graduate medical trainee involvement with patient safety and incident reporting is an important task in teaching hospitals that has been recognised across the country and led to numerous efforts to address barriers to incident reporting. A variety of studies have started to define the reasons why trainees are not optimally involved and interventions that may be helpful. The present study aims to add to this literature by primarily addressing barriers that can be considered ‘non-technical’ such as fears surrounding potential professional repercussions after submitting a report, perceptions that reporting incidents is not useful, and concerns about anonymity. Methods Barriers to incident reporting were previously analysed at our institution. A video was produced to directly target the barriers discovered. A 2-hour educational session was delivered which included the video intervention. The educational session was part of the standard patient safety curriculum at our institution. Paper surveys were used to capture changes in perceived barriers to incident reporting. Baseline and postintervention surveys were analysed for changes using t-tests and a p value of <0.05 to determine significance. Survey development included literature review, patient safety expert discussion and cognitive interviews. Results Perceived knowledge about the reporting process significantly improved after the intervention (t=−4.49; p<0.05). Attitudes about reporting also significantly improved with reduction in fear of negative consequences and anonymity. Perceptions of reporting being a futile activity were also diminished after the intervention. Conclusions This study demonstrates that targeting non-technical barriers to incident reporting with a video intervention is an effective way to improve perceived knowledge and attitude about incident reporting.