Back to Authors

Lal, Devyani

0000-0002-7593-2385

Mayo Clinic

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Citations 36

Sinonasal Outcomes Using Oral Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Positive Sinonasal Cultures
Martinez‐Paredes, Jhon F. , Donaldson, Angela M. , Marino, Michael J. , Olomu, Osarenoma , Alfakir, Razan , Stokken, Janalee K., O’Brien, Erin K. , Lal, Devyani , Marino, Michael J , Choby, Garret , Olomu, Osarenoma , Alfakir, Razan , O'Brien, Erin K , Lal, Devyani , Choby, Garret

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 02 | Pages: e286-e295

10.1055/s-0042-1743275 Get It

Abstract Introduction Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and positive sinonasal bacterial cultures may be recalcitrant to topical therapy alone due to the additional local inflammatory burden associated with bacterial infection/colonization. Objective To evaluate sinonasal outcomes in CRSwNP patients with a positive perioperative bacterial culture, who were treated with postoperative intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) alone versus INCS in combination with a short-term course of oral corticosteroids (OCS). Methods This is a retrospective chart review of CRSwNP patients. A total of 59 patients met inclusion criteria, including positive perioperative bacterial culture and treatment with INCS with or without concomitant use of OCS. Two cohorts were formed based on the chosen postoperative medical treatment; 32 patients underwent postoperative INCS alone, while 27 underwent INCS plus a ≤ 2-week course of OCS. The 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores and Lund-Kennedy scores (LKS) were assessed preoperatively, and at 2-week, 4-week, and 4 to 6 months after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Results There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative sinonasal symptoms or endoscopic scores between the cohorts treated with INCS plus OCS versus those prescribed INCS alone (p > 0.05). Our regression model failed to demonstrate a relationship between the use of OCS and better sinonasal outcomes at 2-week, 4-week, and 4 to 6 months after ESS (p > 0.05). Conclusion Our study suggests that in a cohort of CRSwNP patients with recent bacterial infections, the postoperative use of combined OCS and INCS did not result in a statistical improvement of endoscopic and symptomatic outcomes over INCS irrigation alone. However, both treatment groups had a clinically significant improvement based on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference.
Antibody responses to the host microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis
Lal, Devyani , Song, Lusheng , Cope, Emily K. , Williams, Stacy , Magee, D. Mitchell, Brar, Tripti , Lal, Devyani , Keim, Paul , Chung, Yunro , Murugan, Vel , LaBaer, Joshua

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | December 12, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1503-1510

10.1002/alr.23107 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe role of microbes in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly understood. We hypothesize that analyzing prior microbial exposures via assessing microbial protein serological reactivity in CRS versus controls may offer insights for CRS etiopathogenesis.MethodsWe profiled IgG and IgA antibodies to individual microbial proteins in serum samples of CRS patients and controls using a novel high‐throughput microarray protein technology, Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array (NAPPA). The study was conducted on 118 subjects (39 CRS, 79 controls). A CRS‐focused NAPPA array, with 1557 potentially sero‐reactive microbial proteins elected from a pre‐screening of 6500 genes of interest was constructed. It included membrane‐associated proteins from 47 bacterial species and all proteins from 43 viral strains. Differences between CRS and controls were compared across individual antimicrobial antibodies and the species.ResultsChronic rhinosinusitis patients had significantly elevated antimicrobial antibodies compared with controls. One bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus) and three viral strains (human metapneumovirus, human herpesvirus 5, and human herpesvirus 4) were identified as sources of the proteins that showed significantly elevated sero‐reactivity in CRS patients. Within CRS, patients with polyps had elevated antibodies against S. aureus, influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2), and rhinovirus B14. CRS patients without polyps showed more antibodies against human herpesvirus 1 and vaccinia virus WR.ConclusionsCompared with healthy controls, CRS patients’ serum samples showed significantly increased sero‐reactivity to both bacterial and viral proteins, reflecting recent or current infection or active colonization. Significantly higher antibodies against S. aureus, human metapneumovirus, human herpesvirus 5, and human herpesvirus 4 in CRS need further study.
Optimizing dacryocystorhinostomy success in a “low‐dacryocystorhinostomy volume” rhinology practice
Luong, Hanna N. , Brar, Tripti , Miglani, Amar , Lal, Devyani , Lal, Devyani

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 16, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 288-290

10.1002/alr.23084 Get It

Factors associated with invasive fungal sinusitis in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and single‐center case series
Donovan, Maggie R. , Miglani, Amar , Lal, Devyani , Marino, Michael J. , Lal, Devyani

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 913-919

10.1002/lio2.833 Get It

AbstractObjectiveInvasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) in patients with active or recent COVID‐19 have been reported throughout the world. The primary purpose of the systematic review is to describe factors associated with IFS in patients with COVID‐19. The goal of the case series was to also characterize these factors in addition to evaluating the incidence of IFS at our institution after the onset of the pandemic.MethodsA systematic review using the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) framework identified publications of IFS cases associated with COVID‐19 (IFSAC). Search terms were “COVID‐19,” “invasive,” “fungal,” and “sinusitis.” IFS cases were evaluated for COVID‐19 status, fungal etiology, comorbidities, treatment, and outcome. A case series of patients at our center with IFS between December 1, 2018 to March 31, 2020 (“pre‐covid”) and April 1, 2020 to August 1, 2021 (“post‐covid”) was also performed with the above parameters.ResultsFourteen studies totaling 206 cases of IFSAC were identified. Most cases came from India (140/206, 68.0%), followed by Egypt (62/206, 30.1%), and North America (4/206, 1.9%). Diabetes was the most common comorbidity (151/206, 73.3%). Recent or prolonged steroid use was noted in 65.0% of cases (134/206). In our series, five pre‐covid and four post‐covid cases were identified. One had recent COVID‐19 infection. Acute myeloid leukemia was the most common pre‐covid comorbidity (3/5, 60.0%). Diabetes was the most frequent post‐covid comorbidity (2/4, 50.0%). Chronic steroid usage was noted in two pre‐covid and one post‐covid cases.ConclusionDiabetes and steroid use are common factors in reported cases of IFSAC. IFS incidence in our case series did not change appreciably after the onset of the pandemic.Level of Evidence: 4.
Urinary leukotriene E4 is a biomarker for chronic rhinosinusitis associated with leukotriene dysregulation irrespective of aspirin sensitivity status
Idler, Beau M. , Lal, Devyani , Marino, Michael J. , Lal, Devyani

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | November 25, 2021 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 805-808

10.1002/alr.22915 Get It

“Black fungus”: a perspective on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐associated rhino‐orbital mucormycosis epidemic in India
Thakar, Alok , Lal, Devyani , Lal, Devyani

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | June 29, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1278-1279

10.1002/alr.22855 Get It

Gender and authorship trends in rhinology, allergy, and skull‐base literature from 2008 to 2018
Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Rao, Anupriya, Desai‐Markowski, Stuti, Yang, Alex , Luong, Amber , O’Brien, Erin K. , Gray, Stacey T. , Lal, Devyani , Lin, Sandra Y. , Orlandi, Richard R. , Wise, Sarah K. , O'Brien, Erin K , Orlandi, Richard , Lal, Devyani

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | March 17, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1336-1346

10.1002/alr.22793 Get It

BackgroundA recent analysis suggested potential narrowing of the gender gap in research productivity in the field of rhinology. This analysis did not, however, provide insight into how the genders are represented in the rhinologic literature. This study aimed to evaluate 11 years of literature to evaluate for gender differences in authorship position, collaborations, category and content of research, citations, and funding to gain perspective on how gender and authorship has changed over time.MethodsAuthorship data for all articles on rhinologic subject matter published between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018 in four otolaryngology journals was collected. The gender of authors was determined by protocol. Category and content of research and funding status/source were additionally obtained.ResultsData were collected from 2666 articles. Gender of 14,510 authors was determined. Female authors accounted for 23% of the overall authors and male authors accounted for 77%. Female first authorship increased significantly over time, but there was no change in female senior authorship. The percentage of female authors steadily increased over time, whereas male authorship decreased slightly. Mixed gender teams were shown to be increasing in frequency. Women published more than expected in basic science and allergy and less than expected in skull base. On funded studies, women were significantly underrepresented as senior authors.ConclusionThis study represents the first assessment of gender differences in the rhinology literature. Areas where female representation can improve include senior authorship, increased involvement in skull base publications, and increased funding.
Benefits of biologic therapy administered for asthma on co‐existent chronic rhinosinusitis: A real‐world study
Bajpai, Shilpika , Marino, Michael J. , Rank, Matthew A. , Donaldson, Angela M. , O’Brien, Erin K. , Lal, Devyani , Lal, Devyani , O'Brien, Erin K

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | February 3, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1152-1161

10.1002/alr.22774 Get It

BackgroundAsthma and some chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) subtypes are mediated by similar pathophysiologic mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of biologic therapy for asthma on co‐existent CRS in the “real‐world” setting.MethodsA review of electronic health records (2016‐2019) at Mayo Clinic was conducted to identify asthma patients treated with biologics who had co‐existent CRS. Matched‐pair analyses compared pretherapy and posttherapy Lund‐Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) scores. Performance of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) after initiating biologics was studied.ResultsWe identified 247 patients who received anti‐asthma biologic therapy and had co‐existent CRS. Of these, 181 patients (73.3%) had CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 66 (26.7%) had CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). The biologics utilized were omalizumab (51.0%), mepolizumab (46.6%), benralizumab (10.5%), reslizumab (1.6%), and dupilumab (2.4%). Anti‐interleukin‐5 (anti‐IL‐5) intervention was associated with significant improvement in CT scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup, CRSsNP subgroup) and SNOT‐22 scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup). Patients on omalizumab had a decrease in CT scores, but not SNOT‐22 scores. ESS was performed in 206 patients (84.1%); 55 (22.3%) underwent surgery post–biologic intervention (anti‐IL‐5: 16.5%; omalizumab 27.8% of patients).ConclusionAnti‐IL‐5 agents were associated with improved CT and SNOT‐22 scores in the overall CRS group and in CRSwNP subgroup; CRSsNP patients showed improved CT scores only. Omalizumab improved CT but not SNOT‐22 scores. ESS was performed in 22% of patients after initiating biologics. These real‐world results may influence future trial designs and clinical applications of biologics for CRS. ©2021 ARSAAOA, LLC.
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021
Orlandi, Richard R. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Smith, Timothy L. , Bleier, Benjamin S. , DeConde, Adam S., Luong, Amber , Poetker, David M., Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma Terezinha , Bachert, Claus , Baroody, Fuad M. , Batra, Pete S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Bhattacharyya, Neil , Chang, Eugene H., Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Noah , Conley, David B. , DelGaudio, John M. , Desrosiers, Martin , Douglas, Richard , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gray, Stacey T. , Gudis, David A. , Hamilos, Daniel L. , Han, Joseph K., Harvey, Richard J. , Hellings, Peter W. , Hopkins, Claire , Hwang, Peter H. , Javer, Amin R. , Kennedy, David W. , Kern, Robert C. , Lee, Heung‐Man , Lee, Jivianne T. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Lund, Valerie, McMains, Kevin C. , Metson, Ralph, Naclerio, Robert M. , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Parikh, Sanjay R., Patel, Zara M. , Peters, Anju T. , Philpott, Carl , Roh, Hwan‐Jung , Rudmik, Luke , Sacks, Raymond , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Kristine A. , Stewart, Michael G. , Suh, Jeffrey D. , Tan, Bruce K. , Drunen, Cornelis M. van , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Wright, Erin D. , Yan, Carol H. , Zhang, Luo , Zhou, Bing , Chang, Michael T. , Bleier, Benjamin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Beswick, Daniel , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gudis, David A , Holbrook, Eric H , Hopkins, Claire , Javer, Amin R , Jiang, Rong-San , Lal, Devyani , Lee, Heung-Man , Levy, Joshua M , Patel, Zara , Philpott, Carl , Ramakrishnan, Vijay R , Smith, Kristine , Yan, Carol , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Harvey, Richard J , Hwang, Peter H , Chang, Michael T , Soler, Zachary M. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Beswick, Daniel M. , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chang, Eugene H., Chiu, Alexander G. , Cohen, Noam A., Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Holbrook, Eric H. , Laidlaw, Tanya M. , Lal, Devyani , Lane, Andrew P , Mullol, Joaquim , Passàli, Desiderio , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Snidvongs, Kornkiat , Turner, Justin H. , Voegels, Richard Louis , Wang, De Yun

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | November 25, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 213-739

10.1002/alr.22741 Get It

I. Executive Summary Background The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.
Machine learning of biomarkers and clinical observation to predict eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis: a pilot study
Thorwarth, Ryan, Scott, Derek W., Lal, Devyani , Marino, Michael J. , Thorwarth, Ryan M, Lal, Devyani , Scott, Derek W.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | May 30, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 8-15

10.1002/alr.22632 Get It

BackgroundSubtyping chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) by tissue eosinophilia has prognostic and therapeutic implications, and is difficult to predict using peripheral eosinophil counts or polyp status alone. The objective of this study was to test machine learning for prediction of eosinophilic CRS (eCRS).MethodsInput variables were defined as peripheral eosinophil count, urinary leukotriene E4 (uLTE4) level, and polyp status. The output was diagnosis of eCRS, defined as tissue eosinophil count >10 per high‐power field. Patients undergoing surgery for CRS were retrospectively reviewed for complete datasets. Univariate analysis was performed for each input as a predictor of eCRS. Logistic regression and artificial neural network (ANN) machine learning models were developed using random and surgeon‐specific training/test datasets.ResultsA total of 80 patients met inclusion criteria. In univariate analysis, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for peripheral eosinophil count and uLTE4 were 0.738 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.616 to 0.840) and 0.728 (95% CI, 0.605 to 0.822), respectively. Presence of polyps was 94.1% sensitive, but 51.7% specific. Logistic regression models using random and surgeon specific datasets resulted in AUC of 0.882 (95% CI, 0.665 to 0.970) and 0.945 (95% CI, 0.755 to 0.995), respectively. ANN models resulted in AUC of 0.918 (95% CI, 0.756 to 0.975) and 0.956 (95% CI, 0.828 to 0.999) using random and surgeon‐specific datasets, respectively. Model comparison of logistic regression and ANN was not statistically different. All machine learning models had AUC greater than univariate analyses (all p < 0.003).ConclusionMachine learning of 3 clinical inputs has the potential to predict eCRS with high sensitivity and specificity in this patient population. Prospective investigation using larger and more diverse populations is warranted.