Brigham, Tara J

A biliary stricture is an abnormal narrowing in the ductal drainage system of the liver that can result in clinically and physiologically relevant obstruction to the flow of bile. The most common and ominous etiology is malignancy, underscoring the importance of a high index of suspicion in the evaluation of this condition. The goals of care in patients with a biliary stricture are confirming or excluding malignancy (diagnosis) and reestablishing flow of bile to the duodenum (drainage); the approach to diagnosis and drainage varies according to anatomic location (extrahepatic vs perihilar). For extrahepatic strictures, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is highly accurate and has become the diagnostic mainstay. In contrast, the diagnosis of perihilar strictures remains a challenge. Similarly, the drainage of extrahepatic strictures tends to be more straightforward and safer and less controversial than that of perihilar strictures. Recent evidence has provided some clarity in multiple important areas pertaining to biliary strictures, whereas several remaining controversies require additional research. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing clinicians with the most evidence-based guidance on the approach to patients with extrahepatic and perihilar strictures, focusing on diagnosis and drainage.

Introduction In the unprecedented era of COVID-19, ongoing research and evolution of evidence has led to ever-changing guidelines for clinical monitoring and therapeutic options. Formulating treatment protocols requires the understanding and application of the evolving research. Objective The primary objective of this study is to present a systematic evidence-based approach to synthesize the necessary data in order to optimize the management of COVID-19. Methods At Mayo Clinic Florida, we developed a multidisciplinary centralized COVID Treatment Review Panel (TRP) of expert pulmonologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, anesthesiologists, hematologists, rheumatologists, and hospitalists that in real-time reviews the latest evidence in peer-reviewed journals, the available clinical trials, and help guide the rapid application of therapeutics or interventions to the patient and the bedside provider. Results/Conclusions The multi-disciplinary team approach of synthesizing clinical data and coordinating care is effective in responding to rapidly evolving and changing evidence. Systematic data collection and evidence-based treatment algorithms enable physicians to rapidly translate the current literature to clinical practice, and improve care and outcomes of patients.

Background: A transbronchial forceps lung biopsy performed in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure of unknown etiology has significant uncertainty of diagnostic yield and safety along with sparse literature. This study investigated the complication rate of transbronchial biopsies in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit and its ability to obtain a diagnosis and change current therapy. Methods: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for all publications of transbronchial lung biopsies in mechanically ventilated patients. We pooled the results of individual studies using random-effects meta-analysis models to achieve the summary proportions. Results: Of the identified 9 observational studies with a total of 232 patients undergoing a transbronchial biopsy, complications occurred in 67 patients [25.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.5%-42.0%; I 2=70.0%]. Pneumothorax occurred in 24 patients (9.5%; 95% CI, 4.5%-16.2%; I 2=15.9%) and bleeding in 18 patients (8.9%; 95% CI, 4.1%-15.3%; I 2=0%). A diagnosis was given in 146 patients (62.9%; 95% CI, 56.0%-69.1%; I 2=74.6%), with 103 of 210 patients (49.0%; 95% CI, 44.6%-55.1%; I 2=74.9%) having a change in treatment. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that a transbronchial forceps biopsy when performed in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure of unclear etiology had a moderate complication rate. These biopsies resulted in varied diagnoses with a high rate of management change. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to identify the ideal patients to perform a transbronchial forceps biopsy on in the intensive care unit.

Objective: Review the use of upper-extremity orthoses and casts after injuries to the wrist and hand in the pediatric, adolescent, and young adult population. The common injuries reviewed include pediatric distal radius fractures, scaphoid fractures, metacarpal fractures, mallet fingers, volar plate injuries of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Data Sources: We conducted a literature review from 1985 to 2016 of upper-extremity orthotic interventions. Non–English language citations and animal studies were excluded. Citations from retrieved studies were used to identify other relevant publications. This review included cases of common injuries to the upper extremity, which required orthotic intervention. Main Results: Immobilization recommendations for nonsurgical pediatric distal radius fractures, nonsurgical metacarpal fractures, mallet fingers, and UCL tears of the thumb MCP include a removable orthosis. Nondisplaced scaphoid fracture orthosis recommendations include initial immobilization in a nonremovable short-arm thumb spica cast. Volar plate injuries of the PIP joint require buddy straps for healing. Conclusions: The literature demonstrates the effectiveness of removable orthoses in healing, patient satisfaction, and time to return to activity after many common upper-extremity injuries. Removable orthoses should be considered an equal or superior treatment method to cast immobilization, immobilization of additional joints, or longer periods of immobilization.