Levin, G

ObjectivesTo examine the outcomes of planned induction of labour versus spontaneous onset of labour among women using prophylactic‐dose low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUniversity hospital.PopulationWomen receiving antepartum prophylactic LMWH therapy undergoing a trial of vaginal delivery.MethodsCharts from 2018–2019 were reviewed.Main outcome measuresDuration of anticoagulation interruption and eligibility to receive neuraxial anaesthesia.ResultsData from 199 women were analysed; 78 (39.2%) were admitted following spontaneous onset of labour and 121 (60.8%) underwent planned induction of labour. Compared to women who underwent planned induction of labour, women who presented with spontaneous onset of labour had a shorter median admission‐to‐delivery interval (4.7 versus 29.3 hours, P < 0.001). Similarly, intervals from the last LMWH injection to delivery (25.8 versus 48.2 hours, P < 0.001) and to the first postpartum LMWH injection (41.2 versus 63.7 hours, P < 0.001) were shorter. Among those with spontaneous onset of labour, 69 (88.5%) were eligible to receive neuraxial anaesthesia. Rates of postpartum haemorrhage and blood transfusion were similar between the groups. No thrombotic events were encountered in those with spontaneous onset of labour, but four (3.3%) women who delivered following induction of labour developed a postpartum thrombotic event.ConclusionPlanned induction of labour was associated with a higher risk of postpartum thrombotic events than was spontaneous onset of labour (4 of 121 [3.3%] versus 0 of 78 [0%]), presumably due to prolonged duration of anticoagulation interruption, although the difference was not statistically significant. Allowing spontaneous onset of labour was associated with comparable rates of bleeding complications, and only a low proportion (9 of 78, 11.5%) were not eligible to receive neuraxial anaesthesia.Tweetable abstractPlanned induction among women using prophylactic LMWH therapy might increase the risk of thromboembolic complications.

ABSTRACTObjectiveCervical cerclage, when performed in twin gestation, has been reported to be associated with poor outcome. However, the role of first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage among women with a twin pregnancy and a history of preterm birth has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy outcomes among women with a twin pregnancy who underwent first‐trimester history‐indicated cervical cerclage compared with outcomes in those managed expectantly.MethodsThis was a retrospective matched case–control study. The study group comprised all women with a twin pregnancy who had undergone first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage during the period 2006 to 2017 at Hadassah‐Hebrew University Medical Center. A control group of women with a twin pregnancy who were managed expectantly was established by matching age, history of spontaneous preterm birth (20–36 weeks' gestation) and year of delivery. Pregnancy and delivery characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsData from 82 women with a twin gestation were analyzed, of whom 41 underwent first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage and 41 were matched controls who were managed expectantly. Gestational age at delivery was higher in the cerclage group than in those managed expectantly (median 35 vs 30 weeks; P < 0.0001). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth before 24 weeks (2.4% vs 19.5%; odds ratio (OR), 0.10 (95% CI, 0.01–0.87); P = 0.03), before 28 weeks (12.2% vs 34.1%; OR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09–0.84); P = 0.03), before 32 weeks (22.0% vs 56.1%; OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08–0.58); P = 0.003) and before 34 weeks (34.1% vs 82.9%; OR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.04–0.30); P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the cerclage group than in the control group. Median birth weight was higher in the cerclage group (2072 g vs 1750 g; P = 0.003), with lower rates of low birth weight (< 2500 g) (65.0% vs 89.4%; P = 0.001) and very low birth weight (< 1500 g) (21.3% vs 37.9%; P = 0.03) than in the group managed expectantly. Rates were also lower in the cerclage group for stillbirth, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, neonatal mortality and composite adverse neonatal outcome.ConclusionsHistory‐indicated cerclage performed in the first trimester, as compared with expectant management, in women with a twin pregnancy had an overall positive effect on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. These findings suggest the need for adequate randomized trials on cerclage placement in this subset of women. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

AbstractIntroductionPrevious reports have shown that suboptimal antenatal corticosteroids administration occurs in most cases. However, as multifetal gestations were either excluded or constituted a small proportion of the participants in these studies, little is known about the patterns of use of antenatal corticosteroids in twin pregnancies.Material and methodsWe reviewed the records of women who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered between 240/7 and 346/7 weeks of gestation during 2015‐2017 at 2 university hospitals. Optimal antenatal corticosteroids timing was defined as delivery ≥24 hours ≤7 days from the previous antenatal corticosteroids course.ResultsOf 424 pregnancies, 307 (72.4%) were singleton and 117 were (27.6%) twin. For twin compared with singleton pregnancies, gestational age at initial antenatal corticosteroids administration was lower (P = 0.02), the proportion of deliveries within the optimal window of the initial antenatal corticosteroids course was lower (19.7% vs 33.2%, P = 0.001), and the proportion of women eligible for a rescue antenatal corticosteroids course was higher (58.1% vs 32.9%, P < 0.0001). However, despite similar rates of rescue antenatal corticosteroids administration (P = 0.64), the overall rate of delivery within any optimal window (either initial or rescue course) was lower in twin than singleton pregnancies (26.5% vs 42.3%, P = 0.004), and the antenatal corticosteroids‐to‐delivery interval was longer (median 6.9 vs 4.2 days, P = 0.0009). In multivariate analysis, optimal antenatal corticosteroids administration was negatively associated with twin pregnancy (P = 0.04) and preterm labor (P = 0.05), and positively associated with the presence of gestational hypertensive disorders (P = 0.03).ConclusionsTwin pregnancy is an independent risk factor for suboptimal antenatal corticosteroids administration. Directed efforts should be made to improve the utilization of antenatal corticosteroids in this vulnerable group of women.